IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2020i1p299-d472886.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision Support in Selecting Airfield Pavement Design Alternatives Using Life Cycle Assessment: Case Study of Nashville Airport

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Azhar Butt

    (University of California Pavement Research Center, University of California Davis, 2001 Ghausi Hall, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA)

  • John Harvey

    (University of California Pavement Research Center, University of California Davis, 2001 Ghausi Hall, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA)

  • Arash Saboori

    (University of California Pavement Research Center, University of California Davis, 2001 Ghausi Hall, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA)

  • Maryam Ostovar

    (University of California Pavement Research Center, University of California Davis, 2001 Ghausi Hall, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA)

  • Manuel Bejarano

    (Atkins, 482 S. Keller Rd., Orlando, FL 32810, USA)

  • Navneet Garg

    (Airport Technology R&D Branch, FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center, Atlantic City, NJ 08405, USA)

Abstract

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has taken measures to improve safety, reduce costs, increase resilience, and improve the sustainability of the United States (U.S.) airfield infrastructure by using a life-cycle cost analysis methodology to increase the efficient use of economic resources needed for expanding and preserving the airfield system. However, a life-cycle assessment (LCA) approach for evaluating the environmental impacts of decisions regarding airfield infrastructure has yet to be fully developed and applied. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the use of the airfield LCA framework that was developed for the FAA and can be used by U.S. airports. The comparison of alternative pavement designs at Nashville International Airport (BNA) is presented. The scope of the study was from cradle to laid; materials, materials transportation, and construction stages of the pavement life cycle are considered, and the maintenance, use and end of life stages are not considered. Primary data were acquired from BNA and secondary data were used in situations of unavailability of primary data. The case study showed that performing LCA provides opportunities for airports to consider energy use and environment-related impacts in the decision-making process.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Azhar Butt & John Harvey & Arash Saboori & Maryam Ostovar & Manuel Bejarano & Navneet Garg, 2020. "Decision Support in Selecting Airfield Pavement Design Alternatives Using Life Cycle Assessment: Case Study of Nashville Airport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:299-:d:472886
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/299/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/299/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chester, Mikhail V, 2008. "Life-cycle Environmental Inventory of Passenger Transportation in the United States," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt7n29n303, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. Dietmar P. F. Moeller, 2013. "Airport Technology Management," Springer Books, in: K.B. Akhilesh (ed.), Emerging Dimensions of Technology Management, edition 127, pages 105-119, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jariyasunant, Jerald & Carrel, Andre & Ekambaram, Venkatesan & Gaker, David & Sengupta, Raja & Walker, Joan L., 2012. "The Quantified Traveler: Changing transport behavior with personalized travel data feedback," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt3047k0dw, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Cosmina Laura RAT, 2019. "Safety Management System In Air Transportation," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(1), pages 1051-1058, November.
    3. Sofiia Miliutenko & Ingeborg Kluts & Kristina Lundberg & Susanna Toller & Helge Brattebø & Harpa Birgisdóttir & José Potting, 2014. "Consideration Of Life Cycle Energy Use And Greenhouse Gas Emissions In Road Infrastructure Planning Processes: Examples Of Sweden, Norway, Denmark And The Netherlands," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(04), pages 1-26.
    4. Jariyasunant, Jerald & Carrel, Andre & Ekambaram, Venkatesan & Gaker, DJ & Kote, Thejovardhana & Sengupta, Raja & Walker, Joan L., 2011. "The Quantified Traveler: Using personal travel data to promote sustainable transport behavior," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt9jg0p1rj, University of California Transportation Center.
    5. Wojciech SZYMALSKI, 2021. "Energy And Co 2 Emission Intensities Of Various Modes Of Passenger Transport In Warsaw," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 16(2), pages 131-140, June.
    6. Christian Spreafico & Davide Russo, 2020. "Exploiting the Scientific Literature for Performing Life Cycle Assessment about Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    7. Levon Amatuni & Juudit Ottelin & Bernhard Steubing & Jos'e Mogollon, 2019. "Does car sharing reduce greenhouse gas emissions? Life cycle assessment of the modal shift and lifetime shift rebound effects," Papers 1910.11570, arXiv.org.
    8. Ivan Kovynyov & Ralf Mikut, 2019. "Digital technologies in airport ground operations," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-30, April.
    9. Jariyasunant, Jerald & Carrel, Andre & Ekambaram, Venkatesan & Gaker, DJ & Kote, Thejovardhana & Sengupta, Raja & Walker, Joan L., 2011. "The Quantified Traveler: Using personal travel data to promote sustainable transport behavior," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt678537sx, University of California Transportation Center.
    10. Saeed Assani & Jianlin Jiang & Ahmad Assani & Feng Yang, 2019. "Most productive scale size of China's regional R&D value chain: A mixed structure network," Papers 1910.03805, arXiv.org.
    11. Michael Minn, 2019. "Contested Power: American Long-Distance Passenger Rail and the Ambiguities of Energy Intensity Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, February.
    12. Ana María Arbeláez Vélez & Andrius Plepys, 2021. "Car Sharing as a Strategy to Address GHG Emissions in the Transport System: Evaluation of Effects of Car Sharing in Amsterdam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    13. Ryerson, Megan S., 2010. "Optimal Intercity Transportation Services with Heterogeneous Demand and Variable Fuel Price," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt8696z26t, University of California Transportation Center.
    14. Kristoffer W. Lie & Trym A. Synnevåg & Jacob J. Lamb & Kristian M. Lien, 2021. "The Carbon Footprint of Electrified City Buses: A Case Study in Trondheim, Norway," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, February.
    15. Simon Robertson, 2013. "High-speed rail's potential for the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions from short haul aviation: a longitudinal study of modal substitution from an energy generation and renewable energy perspectiv," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5), pages 395-412, July.
    16. Rohacs, Jozsef & Rohacs, Daniel, 2020. "Energy coefficients for comparison of aircraft supported by different propulsion systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    17. Antonia Rahn & Kai Wicke & Gerko Wende, 2022. "Using Discrete-Event Simulation for a Holistic Aircraft Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-31, August.
    18. Rajib Sinha & Lars E. Olsson & Björn Frostell, 2019. "Sustainable Personal Transport Modes in a Life Cycle Perspective—Public or Private?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-13, December.
    19. Igor Kabashkin & Vladimir Perekrestov & Timur Tyncherov & Leonid Shoshin & Vitalii Susanin, 2024. "Framework for Integration of Health Monitoring Systems in Life Cycle Management for Aviation Sustainability and Cost Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-40, July.
    20. Peng Du & Antony Wood & Brent Stephens, 2016. "Empirical Operational Energy Analysis of Downtown High-Rise vs. Suburban Low-Rise Lifestyles: A Chicago Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-27, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:299-:d:472886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.