IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p11330-d1198794.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Landslide Risk Mapping Using the Weight-of-Evidence Method in the Datong Mining Area, Qinghai Province

Author

Listed:
  • He Yang

    (College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China)

  • Qihong Wu

    (College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China)

  • Jianhui Dong

    (College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China
    Engineering Research Center of Catastrophic Prophylaxis and Treatment of Road, Traffic Safety of Ministry of Education, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha 410114, China)

  • Feihong Xie

    (College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China)

  • Qixue Zhang

    (College of Environment and Civil Engineering, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

Abstract

Qinghai is rich in mineral resources, but frequent and large-scale mineral mining has caused secondary damage to the fragile primary surface and produced a large number of landslide disasters. In complex geological environments such as glacier ablation and frequent tectonic movements, a complete quantitative evaluation method for landslide risk in high-cold mining areas has not yet been formed. In view of this, this article uses the field survey and remote sensing data of the Datong mining area in Qinghai Province in 2012 as the basic data. We comprehensively considered five first-level factors (13 s-level factors) including topography, lithological structure, mining engineering activities, land use, and dynamic deformation as evaluation indicators for landslide susceptibility in mining areas, and used the Topographic Wetness Index (TWI) and the Human Engineering Activity Intensity (HEAI) to quantitatively estimate the hazard of landslide according to the landslide trigger mechanism. The weight-of-evidence approach was used for landslide hazard and risk mapping under different landslide--inducing conditions. The results indicate that the extremely high-hazard areas induced by human engineering activities account for 14% of the total area, and the extremely high-risk areas account for 13% of the total area in the Datong mining area, and the area of the extremely high-risk area is large; the landslide risk assessment mapping model constructed in this study can effectively evaluate the probability of slope instability caused by rainfall and human engineering activities. The effective value of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the sensitivity assessment model reaches 0.863, and the evaluation results are consistent with reality; using the weight-of-evidence model for landslide risk assessment is more in line with the actual situation in alpine mining areas, and is more suitable for guiding landslide risk management and disaster prevention and mitigation in mining areas.

Suggested Citation

  • He Yang & Qihong Wu & Jianhui Dong & Feihong Xie & Qixue Zhang, 2023. "Landslide Risk Mapping Using the Weight-of-Evidence Method in the Datong Mining Area, Qinghai Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-27, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11330-:d:1198794
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11330/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11330/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Per Ahlgren & Bo Jarneving & Ronald Rousseau, 2003. "Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 54(6), pages 550-560, April.
    2. Li Zhuo & Yupu Huang & Jing Zheng & Jingjing Cao & Donghu Guo, 2023. "Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Guangdong Province, China, Using Random Forest Model and Considering Sample Type and Balance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Haoran Fang & Yun Shao & Chou Xie & Bangsen Tian & Chaoyong Shen & Yu Zhu & Yihong Guo & Ying Yang & Guanwen Chen & Ming Zhang, 2023. "A New Approach to Spatial Landslide Susceptibility Prediction in Karst Mining Areas Based on Explainable Artificial Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Anna Roccati & Guido Paliaga & Fabio Luino & Francesco Faccini & Laura Turconi, 2021. "GIS-Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping for Land Use Planning and Risk Assessment," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-28, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruixia Ma & Yan Lyu & Tianbao Chen & Qian Zhang, 2023. "Preliminary Risk Assessment of Geological Disasters in Qinglong Gorge Scenic Area of Taihang Mountain with GIS Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process and Logistic Regression Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-19, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xian Li & Ronald Rousseau & Liming Liang & Fangjie Xi & Yushuang Lü & Yifan Yuan & Xiaojun Hu, 2022. "Is low interdisciplinarity of references an unexpected characteristic of Nobel Prize winning research?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(4), pages 2105-2122, April.
    2. Yi Bu & Binglu Wang & Win-bin Huang & Shangkun Che & Yong Huang, 2018. "Using the appearance of citations in full text on author co-citation analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(1), pages 275-289, July.
    3. Paúl Carrión-Mero & Maribel Aguilar-Aguilar & Fernando Morante-Carballo & María José Domínguez-Cuesta & Cristhian Sánchez-Padilla & Andrés Sánchez-Zambrano & Josué Briones-Bitar & Roberto Blanco-Torre, 2021. "Surface and Underground Geomechanical Characterization of an Area Affected by Instability Phenomena in Zaruma Mining Zone (Ecuador)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Yeawon Yoo & Adolfo R. Escobedo, 2021. "A New Binary Programming Formulation and Social Choice Property for Kemeny Rank Aggregation," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 296-320, December.
    5. van Eck, N.J.P. & Waltman, L., 2009. "How to Normalize Co-Occurrence Data? An Analysis of Some Well-Known Similarity Measures," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2009-001-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    6. Hongchun Shu & Na An & Bo Yang & Yue Dai & Yu Guo, 2020. "Single Pole-to-Ground Fault Analysis of MMC-HVDC Transmission Lines Based on Capacitive Fuzzy Identification Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    7. Aleksandra Pieloch-Babiarz & Anna Misztal & Magdalena Kowalska, 2021. "An impact of macroeconomic stabilization on the sustainable development of manufacturing enterprises: the case of Central and Eastern European Countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 8669-8698, June.
    8. Yang, Siluo & Han, Ruizhen & Wolfram, Dietmar & Zhao, Yuehua, 2016. "Visualizing the intellectual structure of information science (2006–2015): Introducing author keyword coupling analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 132-150.
    9. Vishal Balaji Devanand & Adam Mubeen & Zoran Vojinovic & Arlex Sanchez Torres & Guido Paliaga & Ahmad Fikri Abdullah & João P. Leitão & Natasa Manojlovic & Peter Fröhle, 2023. "Innovative Methods for Mapping the Suitability of Nature-Based Solutions for Landslide Risk Reduction," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, July.
    10. Ying Huang & Wolfgang Glänzel & Lin Zhang, 2021. "Tracing the development of mapping knowledge domains," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 6201-6224, July.
    11. Loet Leydesdorff, 2007. "Mapping interdisciplinarity at the interfaces between the Science Citation Index and the Social Science Citation Index," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 71(3), pages 391-405, June.
    12. Raphaël Maucuer & Alexandre Renaud & Sébastien Ronteau & Laurent Muzellec, 2022. "What can we learn from marketers? A bibliometric analysis of the marketing literature on business model research," Post-Print hal-03718522, HAL.
    13. Jesper W. Schneider & Birger Larsen & Peter Ingwersen, 2009. "A comparative study of first and all-author co-citation counting, and two different matrix generation approaches applied for author co-citation analyses," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 80(1), pages 103-130, July.
    14. van Eck, N.J.P. & Waltman, L., 2007. "Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2007-091-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    15. Jun-Ping Qiu & Ke Dong & Hou-Qiang Yu, 2014. "Comparative study on structure and correlation among author co-occurrence networks in bibliometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(2), pages 1345-1360, November.
    16. Wilfred Dolfsma & Loet Leydesdorff, 2010. "The citation field of evolutionary economics," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 645-664, October.
    17. Persson, Olle, 2010. "Identifying research themes with weighted direct citation links," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 415-422.
    18. Perianes-Rodriguez, Antonio & Waltman, Ludo & van Eck, Nees Jan, 2016. "Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 1178-1195.
    19. Siyan Zeng & Jing Ma & Yanhua Ren & Gang-Jun Liu & Qi Zhang & Fu Chen, 2019. "Assessing the Spatial Distribution of Soil PAHs and their Relationship with Anthropogenic Activities at a National Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Mohib Ullah & Bingzhe Tang & Wenchao Huangfu & Dongdong Yang & Yingdong Wei & Haijun Qiu, 2024. "Machine Learning-Driven Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in the Himalayan China–Pakistan Economic Corridor Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11330-:d:1198794. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.