IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p10895-d1191823.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Does CGI Digital Technology Bring to the Sustainable Development of Animated Films?

Author

Listed:
  • Zhentao Sun

    (School of Fine Arts, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021, China)

Abstract

This study examines the impact of the use of CGI digital technology on the sustainability of animated films. The study shows that because of the powerful virtual capabilities of CGI digital technology, CGI animated films that use CGI digital technology have a huge box office advantage over non-CGI animated films that do not use CGI digital technology, greatly increasing the profitability of animated films and expanding the scope for their sustainability. This study found that CGI digital technology enables animated films to achieve the same visual realism as live-action films, breaking down the barriers to viewing traditional animation and greatly enhancing the competitiveness of animated films. These results show that CGI digital technology has had a profound positive impact on the sustainable development of animation.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhentao Sun, 2023. "What Does CGI Digital Technology Bring to the Sustainable Development of Animated Films?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:10895-:d:1191823
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/10895/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/10895/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thorsten Hennig-Thurau & Mark Houston & Gianfranco Walsh, 2007. "Determinants of motion picture box office and profitability: an interrelationship approach," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 65-92, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elif Idemen & Ayse Banu Elmadag & Mehmet Okan, 2021. "A qualitative approach to designer as a product cue: proposed conceptual model of consumers perceptions and attitudes," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(5), pages 1281-1309, July.
    2. Natalia Gmerek, 2015. "The determinants of Polish movies’ box office performance in Poland," Journal of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour in Emerging Markets, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 1(1), pages 15-35.
    3. Agnani, Betty & Aray, Henry, 2016. "Effects of Oscar awards on movie production," Economics Discussion Papers 2016-8, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    4. Daniel Kaimann & Joe Cox, 2021. "A Comparative Analysis of Consumption: Evidence from a Cultural Goods Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Brianna JeeWon Paulich & V. Kumar, 2021. "Relating entertainment features in screenplays to movie performance: an empirical investigation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 1222-1242, November.
    6. Francis Lee, 2009. "Cultural discount of cinematic achievement: the academy awards and U.S. movies’ East Asian box office," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 33(4), pages 239-263, November.
    7. Guangchao Charles Feng, 2017. "The dynamics of the Chinese film industry: factors affecting Chinese audiences’ intentions to see movies," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 658-676, October.
    8. Henry Aray, 2021. "Oscar awards and foreign language film production: evidence for a panel of countries," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 45(3), pages 435-457, September.
    9. Sven Heidenreich & Franziska Handrich & Tobias Kraemer, 2023. "Flawless victory! Investigating search and experience qualities as antecedent predictors of video game success," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Rubin, Dan & Mohr, Iris & Kumar, V., 2022. "Beyond the box office: A conceptual framework for the drivers of audience engagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 473-488.
    11. Morris Holbrook & Michela Addis, 2008. "Art versus commerce in the movie industry: a Two-Path Model of Motion-Picture Success," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 32(2), pages 87-107, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:10895-:d:1191823. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.