IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p9957-d1176883.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Media Analysis to Enhance Sustainable Knowledge Management: A Concise Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad M. Alghamdi

    (Department of Information Systems and Technology, College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 21493, Saudi Arabia
    School of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia)

  • Salvatore Flavio Pileggi

    (School of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia)

  • Osama Sohaib

    (School of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
    School of Business, American University of Ras Al Khaimah, Ras Al Khaimah 72603, United Arab Emirates)

Abstract

Although knowledge management relying on data from social networks has become an integral part of common practices, there needs to be a well-defined body of knowledge that explicitly addresses the process and the value generated. Sustainable knowledge management practices, which promote responsible and ethical knowledge sharing between different stakeholders, can also be facilitated through social media. This can foster a culture of continuous learning and innovation while considering the social implications of knowledge sharing. The main goal of this study is to critically and holistically discuss the impact of social media analysis in the knowledge management process holistically and maximize its value in a given context. More concretely, we conducted a systematic literature review (2012–2022) based on the PRISMA guidelines. We first approached the ideal phases of the knowledge management process and then discussed key issues and challenges from an application perspective. Overall, the study points out the positive impact of social network analysis on knowledge sharing, creativity and productivity, knowledge formulation, building trust, and cognitive capital. Additionally, value is provided in knowledge acquisition by simplifying and massively gathering information, reducing uncertainty and ambiguity, and organizing knowledge through storage, retrieval, and classification practices. At an application level, such knowledge may improve the quality of services and encourage creativity. Finally, this study analyzed specific domains, such as healthcare, marketing, politics, tourism, and event management, focusing on the potential and added value.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad M. Alghamdi & Salvatore Flavio Pileggi & Osama Sohaib, 2023. "Social Media Analysis to Enhance Sustainable Knowledge Management: A Concise Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-30, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:9957-:d:1176883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/9957/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/9957/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paola De Bernardi & Alberto Bertello & Francesco Venuti, 2019. "Online and On-Site Interactions within Alternative Food Networks: Sustainability Impact of Knowledge-Sharing Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Nisar, Tahir M. & Prabhakar, Guru & Strakova, Lubica, 2019. "Social media information benefits, knowledge management and smart organizations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 264-272.
    3. Engelbrecht, Adrian & Gerlach, Jin & Benlian, Alexander & Buxmann, Peter, 2019. "How Employees Gain Meta-Knowledge Using Enterprise Social Networks: A Validation and Extension of Communication Visibility Theory," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 112362, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    4. Regycleia B. C. Alves & Paulo Pinheiro, 2022. "Factors Influencing Tacit Knowledge Sharing in Research Groups in Higher Education Institutions," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, July.
    5. Tajvidi, Mina & Richard, Marie-Odile & Wang, YiChuan & Hajli, Nick, 2020. "Brand co-creation through social commerce information sharing: The role of social media," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 476-486.
    6. Purva Grover & Arpan Kumar Kar & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2022. "Understanding artificial intelligence adoption in operations management: insights from the review of academic literature and social media discussions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 177-213, January.
    7. Hunt Allcott & Matthew Gentzkow, 2017. "Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election," NBER Working Papers 23089, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Mehdi Tajpour & Elahe Hosseini & Maliheh Mohammadi & Behrooz Bahman-Zangi, 2022. "The Effect of Knowledge Management on the Sustainability of Technology-Driven Businesses in Emerging Markets: The Mediating Role of Social Media," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-15, July.
    9. Lee, In, 2018. "Social media analytics for enterprises: Typology, methods, and processes," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 199-210.
    10. Lucrezia Maria Cosmo & Luigi Piper & Arianna Vittorio, 2021. "The role of attitude toward chatbots and privacy concern on the relationship between attitude toward mobile advertising and behavioral intent to use chatbots," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2021(1), pages 83-102, June.
    11. James Meneghello & Nik Thompson & Kevin Lee & Kok Wai Wong & Bilal Abu-Salih, 2020. "Unlocking Social Media and User Generated Content as a Data Source for Knowledge Management," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 16(1), pages 101-122, January.
    12. Jiexiong Duan & Weixin Zhai & Chengqi Cheng, 2020. "Crowd Detection in Mass Gatherings Based on Social Media Data: A Case Study of the 2014 Shanghai New Year’s Eve Stampede," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-14, November.
    13. Domenico, Giandomenico Di & Sit, Jason & Ishizaka, Alessio & Nunan, Daniel, 2021. "Fake news, social media and marketing: A systematic review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 329-341.
    14. Muhammad Zafar Yaqub & Abdullah Alsabban, 2023. "Knowledge Sharing through Social Media Platforms in the Silicon Age," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Albassam, Bassam A., 2019. "Building an effective knowledge management system in Saudi Arabia using the principles of good governance," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    16. Hunt Allcott & Matthew Gentzkow, 2017. "Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 211-236, Spring.
    17. Salvatore F. Pileggi & Carlos Fernandez-Llatas & Vicente Traver, 2012. "When the Social Meets the Semantic: Social Semantic Web or Web 2.5," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-13, September.
    18. Ahmed Imran KABIR & Ridoan KARIM & Shah NEWAZ & Muhammad Istiaque HOSSAIN, 2018. "The Power of Social Media Analytics: Text Analytics Based on Sentiment Analysis and Word Clouds on R," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(1), pages 25-38.
    19. Olan, Femi & Ogiemwonyi Arakpogun, Emmanuel & Suklan, Jana & Nakpodia, Franklin & Damij, Nadja & Jayawickrama, Uchitha, 2022. "Artificial intelligence and knowledge sharing: Contributing factors to organizational performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 605-615.
    20. Muninger, Marie-Isabelle & Mahr, Dominik & Hammedi, Wafa, 2022. "Social media use: A review of innovation management practices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 140-156.
    21. Paul M. Leonardi, 2014. "Social Media, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation: Toward a Theory of Communication Visibility," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 796-816, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Folajimi Ashiru & Franklin Nakpodia & Jacqueline J You, 2023. "Adapting emerging digital communication technologies for resilience: evidence from Nigerian SMEs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 327(2), pages 795-823, August.
    2. Giandomenico Domenico & Annamaria Tuan & Marco Visentin, 2021. "Linguistic drivers of misinformation diffusion on social media during the COVID-19 pandemic," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2021(4), pages 351-369, December.
    3. Hsin‐Hui Lin & Ching‐Feng Chen & Chih‐Lun Wu, 2023. "The effects of news authenticity and social media tie strength on consumer dissemination behavior," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 2292-2313, June.
    4. Lourdes S. Martinez & Matthew W. Savage & Elisabeth Jones & Elizabeth Mikita & Varun Yadav & Ming-Hsiang Tsou, 2022. "Examining Vaccine Sentiment on Twitter and Local Vaccine Deployment during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Daniel-Rareș Obadă & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2022. "“In Flow”! Why Do Users Share Fake News about Environmentally Friendly Brands on Social Media?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-26, April.
    6. Lazar Laura & Pop Mihai-Ionuţ, 2021. "Impact of Celebrity Endorsement and Breaking News Effect on the Attention of Consumers," Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, Sciendo, vol. 31(3), pages 60-74, September.
    7. Giacomo Manetti & Carmela Nitti & Marco Bellucci, 2022. "The accountability of Search and Rescue NGOs," Working Papers - Business wp2022_02.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    8. Arpan Kumar Kar & Shalini Nath Tripathi & Nishtha Malik & Shivam Gupta & Uthayasankar Sivarajah, 2023. "How Does Misinformation and Capricious Opinions Impact the Supply Chain - A Study on the Impacts During the Pandemic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 327(2), pages 713-734, August.
    9. Pervaiz Akhtar & Arsalan Mujahid Ghouri & Haseeb Ur Rehman Khan & Mirza Amin ul Haq & Usama Awan & Nadia Zahoor & Zaheer Khan & Aniqa Ashraf, 2023. "Detecting fake news and disinformation using artificial intelligence and machine learning to avoid supply chain disruptions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 327(2), pages 633-657, August.
    10. Julia Cage & Nicolas Hervé & Marie-Luce Viaud, 2017. "The Production of Information in an Online World: Is Copy Right?," Working Papers hal-03393171, HAL.
    11. Leopoldo Fergusson & Carlos Molina, 2020. "Facebook Causes Protests," HiCN Working Papers 323, Households in Conflict Network.
    12. Tetsuro Kobayashi & Fumiaki Taka & Takahisa Suzuki, 2021. "Can “Googling” correct misbelief? Cognitive and affective consequences of online search," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-16, September.
    13. Dean Neu & Gregory D. Saxton & Abu S. Rahaman, 2022. "Social Accountability, Ethics, and the Occupy Wall Street Protests," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 17-31, September.
    14. Robbett, Andrea & Matthews, Peter Hans, 2018. "Partisan bias and expressive voting," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 107-120.
    15. Henrik Skaug Sætra, 2021. "AI in Context and the Sustainable Development Goals: Factoring in the Unsustainability of the Sociotechnical System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    16. Fathey Mohammed & Nabil Hasan Al-Kumaim & Ahmed Ibrahim Alzahrani & Yousef Fazea, 2023. "The Impact of Social Media Shared Health Content on Protective Behavior against COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-16, January.
    17. Michele Cantarella & Nicolo' Fraccaroli & Roberto Volpe, 2019. "Does fake news affect voting behaviour?," Department of Economics 0146, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    18. Joël Cariolle & Yasmine Elkhateeb & Mathilde Maurel, 2022. "(Mis-)information technology: Internet use and perception of democracy in Africa," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 22010, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    19. Kerim Peren Arin & Juan A. Lacomba & Francisco Lagos & Deni Mazrekaj & Marcel Thum, 2021. "Misperceptions and Fake News during the Covid-19 Pandemic," CESifo Working Paper Series 9066, CESifo.
    20. Bartosz Wilczek, 2020. "Misinformation and herd behavior in media markets: A cross-national investigation of how tabloids’ attention to misinformation drives broadsheets’ attention to misinformation in political and business," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:9957-:d:1176883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.