IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p9890-d1176158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Game Analysis on Energy Enterprises’ Digital Transformation—Strategic Simulation for Guiding Role, Leading Role and Following Role

Author

Listed:
  • Pingkuo Liu

    (College of Economics and Management, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 200090, China)

  • Jiahao Wu

    (College of Economics and Management, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 200090, China)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore the dynamics and impediments in exploring the digital transformation process of energy enterprises, considering industry competition and government involvement. Compared with other industries, energy enterprises have both economic tasks and social responsibilities at the same time, while their business modes have certain “inertia”. Therefore, the process of their digital transformation cannot avoid the balance of interests between the different agents. From the perspective of competition and cooperation in the sector, this study constructs a tripartite evolutionary game model among the government and energy enterprises, analyzes the evolutionary stable strategies of the game system, and simulates different initial intentions and key parameters for all roles. The results show that in the process of digital transformation, the symbiotic relationship between energy enterprises and the cooperative relationship between enterprises and government can be embodied, and the effective game process has sufficient economic guidance. The government plays the guiding role in the digital transformation of energy enterprises, and its initial intention has a significantly stronger impact than the energy enterprise’s intentions. The effective strategy reflects the principle of “waiting for an opportunity to act, giving priority to efficiency, and giving consideration to justice”. Under the given policy environment, energy enterprises with comparative advantages in terms of transformation costs, direct benefits and synergy will become the leading role that is more sensitive to the opportunities of digital transformation, and the following energy enterprise will adjust its own strategies in time according to the effect of the leading role’s digital transformation so as to achieve the stability of the system. Accordingly, this study can provide reference support for energy enterprises to develop digital transformation strategies and for governments to formulate reasonable and effective policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Pingkuo Liu & Jiahao Wu, 2023. "Game Analysis on Energy Enterprises’ Digital Transformation—Strategic Simulation for Guiding Role, Leading Role and Following Role," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-33, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:9890-:d:1176158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/9890/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/9890/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shao, Yanmin & Chen, Zhongfei, 2022. "Can government subsidies promote the green technology innovation transformation? Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 716-727.
    2. Liang, Lin & Li, Yan, 2023. "How does government support promote digital economy development in China? The mediating role of regional innovation ecosystem resilience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Oded Galor & Omer Moav, 2004. "From Physical to Human Capital Accumulation: Inequality and the Process of Development," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 71(4), pages 1001-1026.
    4. Leonid V Azarnert, 2020. "Health capital provision and human capital accumulation," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 72(3), pages 633-650.
    5. Mutascu, Mihai & Horky, Florian & Strango, Cristina, 2023. "Good or bad? Digitalisation and green preferences," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    6. Jin, Canyang & Xu, Aiting & Zhu, Yuhan & Li, Jinchang, 2023. "Technology growth in the digital age: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    7. Wang, Jianda & Wang, Bo & Dong, Kangyin & Dong, Xiucheng, 2022. "How does the digital economy improve high-quality energy development? The case of China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    8. Verhoef, Peter C. & Broekhuizen, Thijs & Bart, Yakov & Bhattacharya, Abhi & Qi Dong, John & Fabian, Nicolai & Haenlein, Michael, 2021. "Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 889-901.
    9. Galor, Oded, 2005. "From Stagnation to Growth: Unified Growth Theory," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 4, pages 171-293, Elsevier.
    10. Wu, Aihua, 2017. "The signal effect of Government R&D Subsidies in China: Does ownership matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 339-345.
    11. Guo, Xiaochuan & Li, Mengmeng & Wang, Yanlin & Mardani, Abbas, 2023. "Does digital transformation improve the firm’s performance? From the perspective of digitalization paradox and managerial myopia," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    12. Wang, Xiong & Wang, Xiao & Ren, Xiaohang & Wen, Fenghua, 2022. "Can digital financial inclusion affect CO2 emissions of China at the prefecture level? Evidence from a spatial econometric approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    13. HUO, Peng & WANG, Luxin, 2022. "Digital economy and business investment efficiency: Inhibiting or facilitating?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    14. M. Federson & R. Grau & J. G. Mesquita, 2019. "Prolongation of solutions of measure differential equations and dynamic equations on time scales," Mathematische Nachrichten, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 292(1), pages 22-55, January.
    15. Pan, Xianyou & Yuan, Ge & Wu, Xianhua & Xie, Pinjie, 2023. "The effects of government subsidies on the economic profits of hydrogen energy enterprises – An analysis based on A-share listed enterprises in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 445-451.
    16. Gao, Jing & Zhang, Wanfei & Guan, Tao & Feng, Qiuhong & Mardani, Abbas, 2023. "The effect of manufacturing agent heterogeneity on enterprise innovation performance and competitive advantage in the era of digital transformation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PA).
    17. Chaohong Na & Xue Chen & Xiaojun Li & Yuting Li & Xiaolan Wang, 2022. "Digital Transformation of Value Chains and CSR Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-24, August.
    18. Yangjun Ren & Xin Zhang & Hui Chen, 2022. "The Impact of New Energy Enterprises’ Digital Transformation on Their Total Factor Productivity: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, October.
    19. Xu, Qiong & Zhong, Meirui & Li, Xin, 2022. "How does digitalization affect energy? International evidence," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    20. Ghosh, Swapan & Hughes, Mat & Hodgkinson, Ian & Hughes, Paul, 2022. "Digital transformation of industrial businesses: A dynamic capability approach," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    21. Li, Shibin & Wang, Qian, 2023. "Green finance policy and digital transformation of heavily polluting firms: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
    22. Cailou Jiang & Dehai Liu & Qin Zhu & Lu Wang & Benjamin Miranda Tabak, 2021. "Government Subsidies and Enterprise Innovation: Evidence from China's Photovoltaic Industry," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-9, June.
    23. Wang, Lianghu & Shao, Jun, 2023. "Digital economy, entrepreneurship and energy efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    24. Cheng, Yiran & Zhou, Xiaorui & Li, Yongjian, 2023. "The effect of digital transformation on real economy enterprises’ total factor productivity," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 488-501.
    25. Ma, Ruiyang & Lin, Boqiang, 2023. "Digitalization and energy-saving and emission reduction in Chinese cities: Synergy between industrialization and digitalization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    26. Shiguang Li & Yixiang Tian, 2023. "How Does Digital Transformation Affect Total Factor Productivity: Firm-Level Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    27. Azarnert, Leonid V., 2016. "Transportation Costs And The Great Divergence," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 214-228, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Yijun & Meng, Zhenzhen & Song, Yi, 2023. "Digital transformation and metal enterprise value: Evidence from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    2. Zhou, Jingyu & Liu, Weibai, 2024. "Carbon Reduction Effects of Digital Technology Transformation: Evidence from the Listed Manufacturing Firms in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Chen, Zhe & Cao, Yushan & Liao, Kaicheng, 2024. "How state-owned equity participation promotes the digital transformation of nonstate-owned enterprises: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    4. Zhao, Shuang & Zhang, Liqun & Peng, Lin & Zhou, Haiyan & Hu, Feng, 2024. "Enterprise pollution reduction through digital transformation? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    5. Kristaps Lesinskis & Inese Mavlutova & Aivars Spilbergs & Janis Hermanis, 2023. "Digital Transformation in Entrepreneurship Education: The Use of a Digital Tool KABADA and Entrepreneurial Intention of Generation Z," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Lu, Shan & Peng, Sihan & Shi, Jiaxin & Zhang, Ci & Feng, Yanchao, 2024. "How does digital transformation affect the total factor productivity of China's A-share listed enterprises in the mineral resource-based sector?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    7. Wang, Yizi & Li, Lanyi, 2024. "Digital economy, industrial structure upgrading, and residents' consumption: Empirical evidence from prefecture-level cities in China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 1045-1058.
    8. Peipei Qi & Dandan Sun & Can Xu & Qiang Li & Qi Wang, 2023. "Can Data Elements Promote the High-Quality Development of China’s Economy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, April.
    9. Shunbin Zhong & Huafu Shen & Ziheng Niu & Yang Yu & Lin Pan & Yaojun Fan & Atif Jahanger, 2022. "Moving towards Environmental Sustainability: Can Digital Economy Reduce Environmental Degradation in China?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-23, November.
    10. Parantap Basu & Alessandra Guariglia, 2008. "Does Low Education Delay Structural Transformation?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 75(1), pages 104-127, July.
    11. Yuki, Kazuhiro, 2016. "Education, Inequality, And Development In A Dual Economy," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 27-69, January.
    12. Broadberry, Stephen & Ghosal, Sayantan & Proto, Eugenio, 2017. "Anonymity, efficiency wages and technological progress," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 379-394.
    13. Lindner, Ines & Strulik, Holger, 2014. "The great divergence: A network approach," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 193, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    14. repec:got:cegedp:140 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Broadberry, Stephen & Ghosal, Sayantan & Proto, Eugenio, 2011. "Is Anonymity the Missing Link Between Commercial and Industrial Revolution?," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 974, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    16. Kunting Chen, 2012. "Analysis of the Great Divergence under a Unified Endogenous Growth Model," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 13(2), pages 317-353, November.
    17. David E Bloom & Michael Kuhn & Klaus Prettner, 2020. "The contribution of female health to economic development [The costs of missing the Millennium Development Goal on gender equity]," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 130(630), pages 1650-1677.
    18. Wang, Weilong & Xiao, Deheng & Wang, Jianlong & Wu, Haitao, 2024. "The cost of pollution in the digital era: Impediments of air pollution on enterprise digital transformation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    19. Chu, Angus C. & Peretto, Pietro F., 2023. "Innovation and inequality from stagnation to growth," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    20. Glomm, Gerhard & Kaganovich, Michael, 2008. "Social security, public education and the growth-inequality relationship," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(6), pages 1009-1034, August.
    21. Jakob Madsen & Holger Strulik, 2023. "Testing unified growth theory: Technological progress and the child quantity‐quality tradeoff," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 14(1), pages 235-275, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:9890-:d:1176158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.