IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10454-d1185666.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Recovery of a Sequencing Biofilm Batch Reactor—Anammox System: Performance, Metabolic Characteristics, and Microbial Community Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoying Chen

    (Tianjin Key Laboratory of Aquatic Science and Technology, Tianjin Chengjian University, Jinjing Road 26, Tianjin 300384, China
    School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Jinjing Road 26, Tianjin 300384, China)

  • Lingjie Liu

    (Tianjin Key Laboratory of Aquatic Science and Technology, Tianjin Chengjian University, Jinjing Road 26, Tianjin 300384, China
    School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Jinjing Road 26, Tianjin 300384, China)

  • Yanmeng Bi

    (Tianjin Key Laboratory of Aquatic Science and Technology, Tianjin Chengjian University, Jinjing Road 26, Tianjin 300384, China
    School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Jinjing Road 26, Tianjin 300384, China)

  • Fansheng Meng

    (Tianjin Key Laboratory of Aquatic Science and Technology, Tianjin Chengjian University, Jinjing Road 26, Tianjin 300384, China
    School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Jinjing Road 26, Tianjin 300384, China)

  • Dong Wang

    (Tianjin Key Laboratory of Aquatic Science and Technology, Tianjin Chengjian University, Jinjing Road 26, Tianjin 300384, China
    School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Jinjing Road 26, Tianjin 300384, China)

  • Chunsheng Qiu

    (Tianjin Key Laboratory of Aquatic Science and Technology, Tianjin Chengjian University, Jinjing Road 26, Tianjin 300384, China
    School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Jinjing Road 26, Tianjin 300384, China)

  • Jingjie Yu

    (Tianjin Key Laboratory of Aquatic Science and Technology, Tianjin Chengjian University, Jinjing Road 26, Tianjin 300384, China
    School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Jinjing Road 26, Tianjin 300384, China)

  • Shaopo Wang

    (Tianjin Key Laboratory of Aquatic Science and Technology, Tianjin Chengjian University, Jinjing Road 26, Tianjin 300384, China
    School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Jinjing Road 26, Tianjin 300384, China)

Abstract

The mainstream application of the anammox process is often hindered by its long recovery phase and instability under disturbance. In this study, a lab-scale anammox sequencing biofilm batch reactor (SBBR) was rapidly recovered within 85 days by gradually increasing the influent nitrogen concentration, and the total inorganic nitrogen (TIN) removal efficiency achieved 83.44 ± 0.03%. During the recovery process, the nitrogen removal rate (NRR) increased from 0.05 to 0.34 kg/(m 3 ·d), with the nitrogen loading rate (NLR) changing from 0.08 to 0.40 kg/(m 3 ·d) in the anammox system. The activities of hydrazine oxidase (HZO) in the biofilm also increased from 0.17 to 10.80 μmol Cyt-c/(g VSS·s). Also, the dominant anammox genera in the biofilm were Candidatus Kuenenia and Candidatus Brocadia . The results of this study suggested that an SBBR–anammox system filled with a microbial carrier could facilitate the enrichment of anammox bacteria and contribute to performance recovery.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoying Chen & Lingjie Liu & Yanmeng Bi & Fansheng Meng & Dong Wang & Chunsheng Qiu & Jingjie Yu & Shaopo Wang, 2023. "The Recovery of a Sequencing Biofilm Batch Reactor—Anammox System: Performance, Metabolic Characteristics, and Microbial Community Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10454-:d:1185666
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10454/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10454/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tsung-Yueh Tsai & Wen-Yun Chen, 2022. "The Effect of Up-Flow Rate on the Nitrogen Treatment Efficiency and Sludge Characteristics of ANAMMOX Process with Up-Flow Anaerobic Sludge Bed Reactor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Yuan, Haiping & Zhu, Nanwen, 2016. "Progress in inhibition mechanisms and process control of intermediates and by-products in sewage sludge anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 429-438.
    3. Weifeng Deng & Litao Wang & Lang Cheng & Wenbo Yang & Dawen Gao, 2022. "Nitrogen Removal from Mature Landfill Leachate via Anammox Based Processes: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arora, Amarpreet Singh & Nawaz, Alam & Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Ismail, Sherif & Aslam, Muhammad & Tawfik, Ahmed & Yun, Choa Mun & Lee, Moonyong, 2021. "Energy saving anammox technology-based nitrogen removal and bioenergy recovery from wastewater: Inhibition mechanisms, state-of-the-art control strategies, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. El Ibrahimi, Mohammed & Khay, Ismail & El Maakoul, Anas & Bakhouya, Mohamed, 2022. "Effects of the temperature range on the energy performance of mixed and unmixed digesters with submerged waste: An experimental and CFD simulation study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1092-1104.
    3. Choong, Yee Yaw & Chou, Kian Weng & Norli, Ismail, 2018. "Strategies for improving biogas production of palm oil mill effluent (POME) anaerobic digestion: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2993-3006.
    4. Kumar, Atul & Samadder, S.R., 2020. "Performance evaluation of anaerobic digestion technology for energy recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid waste: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    5. Mao, Chunlan & Wang, Yanbo & Wang, Xiaojiao & Ren, Guangxin & Yuan, Liuyan & Feng, Yongzhong, 2019. "Correlations between microbial community and C:N:P stoichiometry during the anaerobic digestion process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 687-695.
    6. Kegl, Tina, 2024. "Anaerobic digestion BioModel upgraded by various inhibition types," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    7. Tien Ngo & Leadin S. Khudur & Ibrahim Gbolahan Hakeem & Kalpit Shah & Aravind Surapaneni & Andrew S. Ball, 2022. "Wood Biochar Enhances the Valorisation of the Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-20, May.
    8. Li, Lei & Liu, Haoyu & Chen, Yongdong & Yang, Donghai & Cai, Chen & Yuan, Shijie & Dai, Xiaohu, 2022. "Effect of Magnet-Fe3O4 composite structure on methane production during anaerobic sludge digestion: Establishment of direct interspecies electron transfer," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 52-60.
    9. Vincenzo Torretta & Athanasia K. Tolkou & Ioannis A. Katsoyiannis & Francesca Maria Caccamo & Marco Carnevale Miino & Marco Baldi & Maria Cristina Collivignarelli, 2021. "Enhancement of Methanogenic Activity in Volumetrically Undersized Reactor by Mesophilic Co-Digestion of Sewage Sludge and Aqueous Residue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-11, July.
    10. Margarita Andreas Dareioti & Aikaterini Ioannis Vavouraki & Konstantina Tsigkou & Michael Kornaros, 2021. "Assessment of Single- vs. Two-Stage Process for the Anaerobic Digestion of Liquid Cow Manure and Cheese Whey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, August.
    11. Di Capua, Francesco & Spasiano, Danilo & Giordano, Andrea & Adani, Fabrizio & Fratino, Umberto & Pirozzi, Francesco & Esposito, Giovanni, 2020. "High-solid anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge: challenges and opportunities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    12. D’ Silva, Tinku Casper & Isha, Adya & Chandra, Ram & Vijay, Virendra Kumar & Subbarao, Paruchuri Mohan V. & Kumar, Ritunesh & Chaudhary, Ved Prakash & Singh, Harjit & Khan, Abid Ali & Tyagi, Vinay Kum, 2021. "Enhancing methane production in anaerobic digestion through hydrogen assisted pathways – A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    13. Richa Singh & Meenu Hans & Sachin Kumar & Yogender Kumar Yadav, 2023. "Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion: An Advancement towards Enhanced Biogas Production from Lignocellulosic Biomass," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Nicola Di Costanzo & Alessandra Cesaro & Francesco Di Capua & Giovanni Esposito, 2021. "Exploiting the Nutrient Potential of Anaerobically Digested Sewage Sludge: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-25, December.
    15. Yellezuome, Dominic & Zhu, Xianpu & Wang, Zengzhen & Liu, Ronghou, 2022. "Mitigation of ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion of nitrogen-rich substrates for biogas production by ammonia stripping: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    16. Silvio Matassa & Giovanni Esposito & Francesco Pirozzi & Stefano Papirio, 2020. "Exploring the Biomethane Potential of Different Industrial Hemp ( Cannabis sativa L.) Biomass Residues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-13, July.
    17. Mao, Chunlan & Xi, Jianchao & Feng, Yongzhong & Wang, Xiaojiao & Ren, Guangxin, 2019. "Biogas production and synergistic correlations of systematic parameters during batch anaerobic digestion of corn straw," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1271-1279.
    18. Lovato, Giovanna & Kovalovszki, Adam & Alvarado-Morales, Merlin & Arjuna Jéglot, Arnaud Tristan & Rodrigues, José Alberto Domingues & Angelidaki, Irini, 2021. "Modelling bioaugmentation: Engineering intervention in anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 1080-1087.
    19. Xiaoshan Meng & Yuxiu Zhang & Qianwen Sui & Junya Zhang & Rui Wang & Dawei Yu & Yawei Wang & Yuansong Wei, 2018. "Biochemical Conversion and Microbial Community in Response to Ternary pH Buffer System during Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Manure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    20. Mao, Chunlan & Wang, Xiaojiao & Xi, Jianchao & Feng, Yongzhong & Ren, Guangxin, 2017. "Linkage of kinetic parameters with process parameters and operational conditions during anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 352-360.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10454-:d:1185666. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.