IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10189-d1180619.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Increasing Service Organizations’ Agility: An Artifact-Based Framework to Elicit Improvement Initiatives

Author

Listed:
  • Mircea Fulea

    (Department of Engineering Design and Robotics, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Bogdan Mocan

    (Department of Engineering Design and Robotics, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Mihai Dragomir

    (Department of Engineering Design and Robotics, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Mircea Murar

    (Department of Engineering Design and Robotics, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

The present research focuses on operational agility in service organizations, which are subject to variability through customers, service providers, suppliers, or unexpected events. As such, their management teams may face challenges in understanding their agility-related assets and success metrics, and furthermore in defining the scope of work for improvement initiatives. Previous research offers quite general insights into agility-related capabilities, practices, obstacles, or (agility-related) information quality evaluation. Yet, management teams need specific practices and techniques in order to improve operational agility capabilities, and thus increase their sustainable performance. We propose a conceptual framework and an artifact-centric algorithm that elicits and prioritizes improvement initiatives by (a) understanding agility-related assets by modelling operational business artifacts, (b) determining agility bottlenecks by identifying quality issues in operational artifacts, and (c) eliciting and prioritizing improvement initiatives to increase artifact quality. The framework application is discussed through a case study in a company operating in the rail freight industry, in which a set of initiatives to improve operational agility capabilities is obtained and prioritized. We conclude that the proposed algorithm is an applicable and relevant tool for management teams in service organizations, in their operational agility improvement endeavors.

Suggested Citation

  • Mircea Fulea & Bogdan Mocan & Mihai Dragomir & Mircea Murar, 2023. "On Increasing Service Organizations’ Agility: An Artifact-Based Framework to Elicit Improvement Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-25, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10189-:d:1180619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10189/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10189/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hazen, Benjamin T. & Bradley, Randy V. & Bell, John E. & In, Joonhwan & Byrd, Terry A., 2017. "Enterprise architecture: A competence-based approach to achieving agility and firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 566-577.
    2. Linying Dong, 2023. "Strengthening Sustainability in Agile Education: Using Client-Sponsored Projects to Cultivate Agile Talents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Abul Khayer & Mohammad Tariqul Islam & Yukun Bao, 2023. "Understanding the Effects of Alignments between the Depth and Breadth of Cloud Computing Assimilation on Firm Performance: The Role of Organizational Agility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, January.
    4. Zhang, David Z., 2011. "Towards theory building in agile manufacturing strategies--Case studies of an agility taxonomy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 303-312, May.
    5. Škare, Marinko & Soriano, Domingo Riberio, 2021. "A dynamic panel study on digitalization and firm's agility: What drives agility in advanced economies 2009–2018," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    6. Aqlan, Faisal & Al-Fandi, Lawrence, 2018. "Prioritizing process improvement initiatives in manufacturing environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 261-268.
    7. Heidari, Farideh & Loucopoulos, Pericles, 2014. "Quality evaluation framework (QEF): Modeling and evaluating quality of business processes," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 193-223.
    8. Weiss, Elliott N. & Goldberg, Rebecca, 2019. "Robust services: People or processes?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(4), pages 521-527.
    9. Bottani, Eleonora, 2010. "Profile and enablers of agile companies: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 251-261, June.
    10. El-Khalil, Raed & Mezher, Mohamad Ali, 2020. "The mediating impact of sustainability on the relationship between agility and operational performance," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna-Theresa Walter, 2021. "Organizational agility: ill-defined and somewhat confusing? A systematic literature review and conceptualization," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 343-391, April.
    2. Iqbal, Tahir & Huq, Faizul & Bhutta, M. Khurrum S., 2018. "Agile manufacturing relationship building with TQM, JIT, and firm performance: An exploratory study in apparel export industry of Pakistan," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 24-37.
    3. Sujan Piya & Ahm Shamsuzzoha & Mohammad Khadem & Nasr Al-Hinai, 2020. "Identification of Critical Factors and Their Interrelationships to Design Agile Supply Chain: Special Focus to Oil and Gas Industries," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(3), pages 263-281, September.
    4. Ahmed Hamdi & Tarik Saikouk & Bouchaib Bahli, 2020. "Facing supply chain disruptions: enhancers of supply chain resiliency," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(4), pages 2943-2958.
    5. Rogier van de Wetering & Sherah Kurnia & Svyatoslav Kotusev, 2020. "The Effect of Enterprise Architecture Deployment Practices on Organizational Benefits: A Dynamic Capability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    6. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2019. "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-82.
    7. Bargoni, Augusto & Santoro, Gabriele & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio & Ferraris, Alberto, 2024. "Growth hacking: A critical review to clarify its meaning and guide its practical application," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    8. Gabriel Albino, 2018. "Technical and Behavioral Competencies on Performance Evaluation: Petrek Leaders’ Perspectives," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(2), pages 21582440187, June.
    9. Loske, Dominic & Klumpp, Matthias, 2021. "Human-AI collaboration in route planning: An empirical efficiency-based analysis in retail logistics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    10. Rob Kim Marjerison & Matthew Andrews & George Kuan, 2022. "Creating Sustainable Organizations through Knowledge Sharing and Organizational Agility: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    11. Gmelin, Harald & Seuring, Stefan, 2014. "Achieving sustainable new product development by integrating product life-cycle management capabilities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 166-177.
    12. Troise, Ciro & Corvello, Vincenzo & Ghobadian, Abby & O'Regan, Nicholas, 2022. "How can SMEs successfully navigate VUCA environment: The role of agility in the digital transformation era," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    13. Ciampi, Francesco & Faraoni, Monica & Ballerini, Jacopo & Meli, Francesco, 2022. "The co-evolutionary relationship between digitalization and organizational agility: Ongoing debates, theoretical developments and future research perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    14. María D. López‐Gamero & José F. Molina‐Azorín & Jorge Pereira‐Moliner & Eva M. Pertusa‐Ortega, 2023. "Agility, innovation, environmental management and competitiveness in the hotel industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 548-562, March.
    15. Meier, Andre & Kock, Alexander, 2021. "Characteristics, Antecedents, and Consequences of Agile R&D Units' Organization - A Conceptual Framework," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 130791, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    16. Brusset, Xavier, 2016. "Does supply chain visibility enhance agility?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P1), pages 46-59.
    17. Hadjielias, Elias & Christofi, Michael & Christou, Prokopis & Hadjielia Drotarova, Maria, 2022. "Digitalization, agility, and customer value in tourism," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    18. Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov & Orji, Ifeyinwa Juliet & Gupta, Himanshu & Kunc, Martin, 2021. "Risks associated with the implementation of big data analytics in sustainable supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    19. Bürgel, Tobias R. & Hiebl, Martin R.W. & Pielsticker, David I., 2023. "Digitalization and entrepreneurial firms' resilience to pandemic crises: Evidence from COVID-19 and the German Mittelstand," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    20. Wen, Huwei & Zhong, Qiming & Lee, Chien-Chiang, 2022. "Digitalization, competition strategy and corporate innovation: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing listed companies," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10189-:d:1180619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.