IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10093-d1179416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inventory Policies and Supply Chain Coordination under Logistics Route Disruption Risks

Author

Listed:
  • Mao Zheng

    (School of Business Administration, Faculty of Business Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 610074, China)

  • Ningning Cui

    (School of Business Administration, Faculty of Business Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 610074, China)

  • Yibin Zhang

    (School of Business Administration, Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance, Shanghai 201620, China)

  • Fangfang Zhang

    (School of Finance and Trade, Wenzhou Business College, Wenzhou 325035, China)

  • Victor Shi

    (Lazaridis School of Business and Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, Canada)

Abstract

Predictable logistics disruptions due to scheduled lockdowns for large-scale events such as the Olympic Games may not only reduce supply chain profits, but also increase carbon emissions. To help solve these problems, an emergency transit policy to be applied to the logistics path is an effective solution. However, optimal inventory control is needed. This paper proposes an optimization model to control ordering and inventory policies for decentralized and centralized supply chains. The model considers the logistics path damping coefficient, the logistics path acceleration coefficient, and the vehicle loading capacity ratio in emergency transit. Our major findings include the following. First, supply chain profits under centralization are confirmed to be higher than under decentralization. Second, a price discount mechanism can achieve supply chain coordination. Third, the manufacturers in a centralized supply chain are more inclined to choose a logistics path with a high acceleration coefficient in order to let their cargo arrive quickly and to reduce the impact of the lead time demand fluctuations. Finally, the implications of our research results for carbon emission reductions are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Mao Zheng & Ningning Cui & Yibin Zhang & Fangfang Zhang & Victor Shi, 2023. "Inventory Policies and Supply Chain Coordination under Logistics Route Disruption Risks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10093-:d:1179416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10093/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10093/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fahimnia, Behnam & Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Sarkis, Joseph, 2018. "Greening versus resilience: A supply chain design perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 129-148.
    2. Brian M. Lewis & Alan L. Erera & Maciek A. Nowak & White Chelsea C., 2013. "Managing Inventory in Global Supply Chains Facing Port-of-Entry Disruption Risks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 162-180, May.
    3. Tang, Christopher S., 2006. "Perspectives in supply chain risk management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 451-488, October.
    4. Aseem Kinra & Dmitry Ivanov & Ajay Das & Alexandre Dolgui, 2020. "Ripple effect quantification by supplier risk exposure assessment," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(18), pages 5559-5578, September.
    5. Yan Shang & David Dunson & Jing-Sheng Song, 2017. "Exploiting Big Data in Logistics Risk Assessment via Bayesian Nonparametrics," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1574-1588, December.
    6. Hamdan, Bayan & Diabat, Ali, 2020. "Robust design of blood supply chains under risk of disruptions using Lagrangian relaxation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    7. Xiaoling Xu & Jennifer Shang & Haiyan Wang & Wen-Chyuan Chiang, 2016. "Optimal production and inventory decisions under demand and production disruptions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 287-301, January.
    8. Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Shams Rahman, 2018. "A quantitative and simulation model for managing sudden supply delay with fuzzy demand and safety stock," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(13), pages 4377-4395, July.
    9. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Ivanov, Dmitry & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2019. "Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 285-307.
    10. Brian Tomlin, 2006. "On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 639-657, May.
    11. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2011. "Selection of supply portfolio under disruption risks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 194-208, April.
    12. Li, Xiaoming & Sridharan, V., 2008. "Characterizing order processes of using (R,nQ) inventory policies in supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1096-1104, December.
    13. Liu, Weihua & Liu, Yang & Zhu, Donglei & Wang, Yijia & Liang, Zhicheng, 2016. "The influences of demand disruption on logistics service supply chain coordination: A comparison of three coordination modes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 59-76.
    14. Noblesse, Ann M. & Boute, Robert N. & Lambrecht, Marc R. & Van Houdt, Benny, 2014. "Characterizing order processes of continuous review (s,S) and (r,nQ) policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(2), pages 534-547.
    15. PrasannaVenkatesan, S. & Goh, M., 2016. "Multi-objective supplier selection and order allocation under disruption risk," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 124-142.
    16. Yi Zheng & Yaoqun Xu & Zeguo Qiu, 2023. "Blockchain Traceability Adoption in Agricultural Supply Chain Coordination: An Evolutionary Game Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    17. Nan Xu & Yaoqun Xu, 2022. "Research on Tacit Knowledge Dissemination of Automobile Consumers’ Low-Carbon Purchase Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-26, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuheng Ren & Wenliang Bian & Haicheng Li & Xiaxia Ma, 2023. "Ordering Decisions with an Unreliable Supplier under the Carbon Cap-and-Trade System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-23, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aldrighetti, Riccardo & Battini, Daria & Ivanov, Dmitry & Zennaro, Ilenia, 2021. "Costs of resilience and disruptions in supply chain network design models: A review and future research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    2. Dmitry Ivanov, 2022. "Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1411-1431, December.
    3. Ivanov, Dmitry, 2020. "Predicting the impacts of epidemic outbreaks on global supply chains: A simulation-based analysis on the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2) case," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    4. Liu, Ming & Liu, Zhongzheng & Chu, Feng & Dolgui, Alexandre & Chu, Chengbin & Zheng, Feifeng, 2022. "An optimization approach for multi-echelon supply chain viability with disruption risk minimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    5. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Ivanov, Dmitry & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2019. "Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 285-307.
    6. Li, Yongjian & Zhen, Xueping & Qi, Xiangtong & Cai, Gangshu (George), 2016. "Penalty and financial assistance in a supply chain with supply disruption," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 167-181.
    7. Tianyi Ding & Zongsheng Huang, 2024. "Uncovering the Research Hotspots in Supply Chain Risk Management from 2004 to 2023: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Md. Tarek Chowdhury & Aditi Sarkar & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Md. Abdul Moktadir, 2022. "A case study on strategies to deal with the impacts of COVID-19 pandemic in the food and beverage industry," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 166-178, June.
    9. Heckmann, Iris & Comes, Tina & Nickel, Stefan, 2015. "A critical review on supply chain risk – Definition, measure and modeling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 119-132.
    10. Shoufeng Ji & Pengyun Zhao & Tingting Ji, 2023. "A Hybrid Optimization Method for Sustainable and Flexible Design of Supply–Production–Distribution Network in the Physical Internet," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-34, April.
    11. Pritee Ray & Mamata Jenamani, 2016. "Sourcing decision under disruption risk with supply and demand uncertainty: A newsvendor approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 237-262, February.
    12. Pritee Ray & Mamata Jenamani, 2016. "Sourcing decision under disruption risk with supply and demand uncertainty: A newsvendor approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 237-262, February.
    13. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Morshedlou, Nazanin & Ivanov, Dmitry & Sarder, M.D. & Barker, Kash & Khaled, Abdullah Al, 2019. "Resilient supplier selection and optimal order allocation under disruption risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 124-137.
    14. Aldrighetti, Riccardo & Battini, Daria & Ivanov, Dmitry, 2023. "Efficient resilience portfolio design in the supply chain with consideration of preparedness and recovery investments," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    15. Hong, Yoo Suk & Huh, Woonghee Tim & Kang, Changmuk, 2017. "Sourcing assemble-to-order inventories under supplier risk uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PA), pages 1-14.
    16. Dmitry Ivanov & Alexandre Dolgui & Boris Sokolov & Marina Ivanova, 2017. "Literature review on disruption recovery in the supply chain," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(20), pages 6158-6174, October.
    17. Lohmer, Jacob & Bugert, Niels & Lasch, Rainer, 2020. "Analysis of resilience strategies and ripple effect in blockchain-coordinated supply chains: An agent-based simulation study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    18. Clemons, Rebecca & Slotnick, Susan A., 2016. "The effect of supply-chain disruption, quality and knowledge transfer on firm strategy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 169-186.
    19. K. Katsaliaki & P. Galetsi & S. Kumar, 2022. "Supply chain disruptions and resilience: a major review and future research agenda," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 965-1002, December.
    20. Cheramin, Meysam & Saha, Apurba Kumar & Cheng, Jianqiang & Paul, Sanjoy Kumar & Jin, Hongyue, 2021. "Resilient NdFeB magnet recycling under the impacts of COVID-19 pandemic: Stochastic programming and Benders decomposition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10093-:d:1179416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.