IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10027-d1178570.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Safety in Numbers’ for Walkers: Effects of Pedestrian Volume on Per-Pedestrian Crash Rate and Severe Injury Probability

Author

Listed:
  • Suji Kim

    (Cho Chun Shik Graduate School of Mobility, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34051, Republic of Korea)

  • Kitae Jang

    (Cho Chun Shik Graduate School of Mobility, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34051, Republic of Korea)

  • Sungjin Park

    (Department of Urban Design and Planning, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

The ‘safety in numbers’ phenomenon is very intriguing to many walking advocates. Some studies have examined the phenomenon for walkers, but they mostly focused on the relationship between pedestrian volume and the likelihood of vehicle–pedestrian crash occurrences. This study evaluated the effects of the ‘safety in numbers’ phenomenon not only on the risk of crash occurrences, but also on the probability of severe or fatal injuries. Pedestrian volume and crash data obtained from the six districts in Seoul Metropolitan City and Jeju Island were jointly analyzed to examine the expected pedestrian crash rate and the probability of severe or fatal injury as a function of pedestrian volume. The analysis confirmed that the expected pedestrian crash rate and the probability of severe or fatal injuries decline as pedestrian volume increases, although the absolute number of crashes and injuries increases. The increase in the number of pedestrian crashes is less than the increase in pedestrian volume. In addition, the probability of severe or fatal injuries tends to diminish with a larger pedestrian volume. These findings can be used as logical evidence to support future policies promoting walking trips, and they suggest that policy measures encouraging walking trips can deliver additional benefits beyond the well-known economic, health, and environmental benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Suji Kim & Kitae Jang & Sungjin Park, 2023. "‘Safety in Numbers’ for Walkers: Effects of Pedestrian Volume on Per-Pedestrian Crash Rate and Severe Injury Probability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-12, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10027-:d:1178570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10027/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10027/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schneider, Robert J. & Henry, Todd & Mitman, Meghan F. & Stonehill, Laura & Koehler, Jesse, 2013. "Development and Application of the San Francisco Pedestrian Intersection Volume Model," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt8cs2g40c, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. Jang, Kitae & Park, Shin Hyoung & Chung, Sungbong & Song, Ki Han, 2010. "Influential Factors on Level of Injury in Pedestrian Crashes: Applications of Ordered Probit Model with Robust Standard Errors," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3qd7k0bv, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    3. Thompson, Jason & Savino, Giovanni & Stevenson, Mark, 2016. "A model of behavioural adaptation as a contributor to the safety-in-numbers effect for cyclists," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 65-75.
    4. Greene-Roesel, Ryan & Diogenes, Mara Chagas & Ragland, David R. & Lindau, Luis Antonio, 2008. "Effectiveness of a Commercially Available Automated Pedestrian Counting Device in Urban Environments: Comparison with Manual Counts," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2n83w1q8, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jae Min Lee, 2021. "Understanding volume and correlations of automated walk count: Predictors for necessary, optional, and social activities in Dilworth Park," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(2), pages 331-347, February.
    2. Evan Thomas & Sally Gerster & Lambert Mugabo & Huguens Jean & Tim Oates, 2020. "Computer vision supported pedestrian tracking: A demonstration on trail bridges in rural Rwanda," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Attaset, Vanvisa & Schneider, Robert J. & Arnold, Lindsay S. & Ragland, David R, 2010. "Effects of Weather Variables on Pedestrian Volumes in Alameda County, California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3zn9f4cr, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    4. Moran, Marcel E., 2022. "Where the Crosswalk Ends: Mapping Crosswalk Coverage via Satellite Imagery in San Francisco," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt67447864, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    5. Belayet Hossain & Laura Lamb, 2012. "The Impact of Human and Social Capital on Aboriginal Employment Income in Canada," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 31(4), pages 440-450, December.
    6. Gabriele Prati & Víctor Marín Puchades & Marco De Angelis & Federico Fraboni & Luca Pietrantoni, 2018. "Factors contributing to bicycle–motorised vehicle collisions: a systematic literature review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 184-208, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10027-:d:1178570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.