IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i12p9572-d1171004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

E-Government 3.0: An AI Model to Use for Enhanced Local Democracies

Author

Listed:
  • Catalin Vrabie

    (Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, 012244 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

While e-government (referring here to the first generation of e-government) was just the simple manner of delivering public services via electronic means, e-gov 2.0 refers to the use of social media and Web 2.0 technologies in government operations and public service delivery. However, the use of the term ‘e-government 2.0’ is becoming less common as the focus shifts towards broader digital transformation initiatives that may include AI technologies, among others, such as blockchain, virtual reality, and augmented reality. In this study, we present the relatively new concept of e-government 3.0, which is built upon the principles of e-government 2.0 but refers to the use of emerging technologies (e.g., artificial intelligence) to transform the delivery of public services and improve governance. The study objective is to explore the potential of e-government 3.0 to enhance citizen participation, improve public service delivery, and increase responsiveness and compliance of administrative systems in relation to citizens by integrating emerging technologies into government operations using as a background the evolution of e-government over time. The paper analyzes the challenges faced by municipalities in responding to citizen petitions, which are a core application of local democracies. The author starts by presenting an example of an e-petition system (as in use today) and analyses anonymized data of a text corpus of petitions directed to one of the Romania municipalities. He will propose an AI model able to deal faster and more accurately with the increased number of inputs, trying to promote it to municipalities who, for some reason, are still reluctant to implement AI in their operations. The conclusions will suggest that it may be more effective to focus on improving new algorithms rather than solely on ‘old’ technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Catalin Vrabie, 2023. "E-Government 3.0: An AI Model to Use for Enhanced Local Democracies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9572-:d:1171004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9572/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9572/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Basma Hamrouni & Abdelhabib Bourouis & Ahmed Korichi & Mohsen Brahmi, 2021. "Explainable Ontology-Based Intelligent Decision Support System for Business Model Design and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-28, September.
    2. Zihao Lu & Xiaohui Hu & Yun Xue, 2022. "Dual-Word Embedding Model Considering Syntactic Information for Cross-Domain Sentiment Classification," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(24), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Sainan Zhao & Yichao Zhang & Huma Iftikhar & Atta Ullah & Jie Mao & Tiantian Wang, 2022. "Dynamic Influence of Digital and Technological Advancement on Sustainable Economic Growth in Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Haibo Yu & Guojun Lu & Qianhua Cai & Yun Xue, 2022. "A KGE Based Knowledge Enhancing Method for Aspect-Level Sentiment Classification," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-12, October.
    5. Vuyani Goodman LANGA & Reckson Dovhani THAKHATHI, 2022. "The role of smart cities to promote smart governance in municipalities," Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 6(2), pages 9-22, April.
    6. Kolkman, Daan, 2020. "The usefulness of algorithmic models in policy making," SocArXiv hpma8, Center for Open Science.
    7. Sorrell, Steve, 2009. "Jevons' Paradox revisited: The evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1456-1469, April.
    8. Suman Kumari & Basant Agarwal & Mamta Mittal, 2021. "A Deep Neural Network Model for Cross-Domain Sentiment Analysis," International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design (IJISMD), IGI Global, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Yu-Che Chen & Michael J. Ahn & Yi-Fan Wang, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence and Public Values: Value Impacts and Governance in the Public Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    10. Vrabie, Cătălin, 2011. "Digital Governance (in Romanian Municipalities). A Longitudinal Assessment of Municipal Web Sites in Romania," Apas Papers 555, Academic Public Administration Studies Archive - APAS.
    11. Ibrahim Abaker Targio Hashem & Raja Sher Afgun Usmani & Mubarak S. Almutairi & Ashraf Osman Ibrahim & Abubakar Zakari & Faiz Alotaibi & Saadat Mehmood Alhashmi & Haruna Chiroma, 2023. "Urban Computing for Sustainable Smart Cities: Recent Advances, Taxonomy, and Open Research Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-32, February.
    12. Louise Ellegaard Fich & Silvia Viola & Niclas Scott Bentsen, 2022. "Jevons Paradox: Sustainable Development Goals and Energy Rebound in Complex Economic Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-3, August.
    13. Nikola Vangelov, 2023. "Ambient Advertising in Metaverse Smart Cities," Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 7(1), pages 43-55, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thomas Cantens, 2023. "How will the State think with the assistance of ChatGPT? The case of customs as an example of generative artificial intelligence in public administrations," CERDI Working papers hal-04233370, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steffen Dalsgaard, 2022. "Can IT Resolve the Climate Crisis? Sketching the Role of an Anthropology of Digital Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Lange, Steffen & Pohl, Johanna & Santarius, Tilman, 2020. "Digitalization and energy consumption. Does ICT reduce energy demand?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    3. Wilson, Christopher & van der Velden, Maja, 2022. "Sustainable AI: An integrated model to guide public sector decision-making," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Maccarrone, Giovanni & Marini, Marco A. & Tarola, Ornella, 2023. "Shop Until You Drop: the Unexpected Effects of Anticonsumerism and Environmentalism," FEEM Working Papers 330384, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    5. Hong, Sanghyun & Bradshaw, Corey J.A. & Brook, Barry W., 2014. "South Korean energy scenarios show how nuclear power can reduce future energy and environmental costs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 569-578.
    6. Karen Turner, 2013. ""Rebound" Effects from Increased Energy Efficiency: A Time to Pause and Reflect," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 4).
    7. Florian Fizaine & Victor Court, 2016. "The energy-economic growth relationship: a new insight from the EROI perspective," Working Papers 1601, Chaire Economie du climat.
    8. Ouyang, Xiaoling & Gao, Beiying & Du, Kerui & Du, Gang, 2018. "Industrial sectors' energy rebound effect: An empirical study of Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 408-416.
    9. Qian Chen & Jaume Freire González & Donglan Zha, 2023. "The Gap between Expectations and Reality: Assessing the Water Rebound Effect in Chinese Agriculture," Working Papers 1415, Barcelona School of Economics.
    10. Charlier, Dorothée & Legendre, Bérangère, 2021. "Fuel poverty in industrialized countries: Definition, measures and policy implications a review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    11. Aldona Standar & Agnieszka Kozera & Łukasz Satoła, 2021. "The Importance of Local Investments Co-Financed by the European Union in the Field of Renewable Energy Sources in Rural Areas of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-23, January.
    12. König, Pascal D. & Wenzelburger, Georg, 2021. "The legitimacy gap of algorithmic decision-making in the public sector: Why it arises and how to address it," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    13. Mubarak Saad Almutairi, 2024. "Evolutionary Multi-Objective Feature Selection Algorithms on Multiple Smart Sustainable Community Indicator Datasets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-25, February.
    14. Michael Gerlich, 2024. "Public Anxieties About AI: Implications for Corporate Strategy and Societal Impact," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-25, November.
    15. Matthew K. Heun & João Santos & Paul E. Brockway & Randall Pruim & Tiago Domingos & Marco Sakai, 2017. "From Theory to Econometrics to Energy Policy: Cautionary Tales for Policymaking Using Aggregate Production Functions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-44, February.
    16. Sebestyénné Szép, Tekla, 2018. "A hatósági árcsökkentés lakossági energiafelhasználásra gyakorolt hatásának vizsgálata indexdekompozícióval [Analysing the effects of utility-cost reduction on household energy consumption, using i," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 185-205.
    17. Minoru Morita & Kazuyuki Iwata & Toshi H. Arimura, 2022. "The rebound effect in air conditioner usage: an empirical analysis of Japanese individuals’ behaviors," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 24(1), pages 99-117, January.
    18. Chung, Leanne & Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung & Li, Pansy Hon Ying, 2016. "The interaction effects of institutional constraints on managerial intentions and sustainable performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PB), pages 374-383.
    19. Salomé Bakaloglou and Dorothée Charlier, 2019. "Energy Consumption in the French Residential Sector: How Much do Individual Preferences Matter?," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3).
    20. van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., 2012. "Effective climate-energy solutions, escape routes and peak oil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 530-536.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9572-:d:1171004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.