IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p9123-d1164342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining ICT Innovation for Sustainable Terminal Operations in Developing Countries: A Case Study of the Port of Radès in Tunisia

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Sahraoui

    (Department of Supply Chain & Digital Management, Métis Lab, Campus of Le Havre, Normandie Business School, 76600 Le Havre, France)

  • Nguyen Khoi Tran

    (Department of Supply Chain & Digital Management, Métis Lab, Campus of Le Havre, Normandie Business School, 76600 Le Havre, France)

  • Youssef Tliche

    (Department of Supply Chain & Digital Management, Métis Lab, Campus of Le Havre, Normandie Business School, 76600 Le Havre, France)

  • Ameni Kacem

    (Seafrigo Group, 76600 Le Havre, France)

  • Atour Taghipour

    (Nimec Lab, University of Le Havre Normandie, 76063 Le Havre, France)

Abstract

There is a lack of technology innovation studies in the maritime sector focusing on developing countries. Generally, these countries present various limitations due to their own social, economic, and political contexts. Moreover, the lack of leadership support, stakeholder involvement, training, resources, and financial and academic support affects successful implementation of technological innovation. The objective of this paper is to emphasize the implementation of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in the maritime sector and port companies of developing countries by investigating the impact of an ICT solution on port operations from berth to gate through yard operations. Our case study consists of the implementation of a Terminal Operating System (TOS) in the Port of Radès, the main port in Tunisia. An examination of the port operations before and after the implementation of the TOS is carried out. Then, the effects of TOS implementation on terminal operations are studied through a survey based on Key Performance Indicators (KPI) and submitted to managers of three port stakeholders. Key findings indicate that TOS allows an increase in the level of productivity from the quay crane to the gate, allowing decisions to be made based on real-time data and ensuring that the terminal is operating at its full potential. More specifically, berthing and delivery service times are improved thanks to the Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) and the streamlining of the gate and yard activities system. The results also indicate that reputation is progressively improving due to the ability to locate and monitor hazardous goods flowing through the port, and the ability to dispatch engine movement inside the port using the new terminal layout. However, in contrast with the port authority, the results highlight a lack of adaptability on the part of the stevedoring company, which requires time to progressively adapt to the new rules and constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Sahraoui & Nguyen Khoi Tran & Youssef Tliche & Ameni Kacem & Atour Taghipour, 2023. "Examining ICT Innovation for Sustainable Terminal Operations in Developing Countries: A Case Study of the Port of Radès in Tunisia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:9123-:d:1164342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/9123/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/9123/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Youssef Tliche & Atour Taghipour & Jomana Mahfod-Leroux & Mohammadali Vosooghidizaji, 2023. "Collaborative Bullwhip Effect-Oriented Bi-Objective Optimization for Inference-Based Weighted Moving Average Forecasting in Decentralized Supply Chain," International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management (IJISSCM), IGI Global, vol. 16(1), pages 1-37, January.
    2. Andrea Caporuscio & Marco Ferretti & Daniele Leone & Francesco Schiavone, 2020. "Exploring Knowledge Sharing in Sea-Land Logistics Networks: Lessons from the Port of Genoa," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 31-52.
    3. Samer Matta & Simon Appleton & Michael Bleaney, 2019. "The Impact of the Arab Spring on the Tunisian Economy," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 33(1), pages 231-258.
    4. Mohammed Balfaqih & Soltan Abed Alharbi, 2022. "Associated Information and Communication Technologies Challenges of Smart City Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-27, December.
    5. Miguel Hervás-Peralta & Sara Poveda-Reyes & Gemma Dolores Molero & Francisco Enrique Santarremigia & Juan-Pascual Pastor-Ferrando, 2019. "Improving the Performance of Dry and Maritime Ports by Increasing Knowledge about the Most Relevant Functionalities of the Terminal Operating System (TOS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, March.
    6. Gaodan Deng & Jingxiao Chen & Quanlong Liu, 2022. "Influence Mechanism and Evolutionary Game of Environmental Regulation on Green Port Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Castillo-Manzano, José I. & Castro-Nuño, Mercedes & Laxe, Fernando González & López-Valpuesta, Lourdes & Teresa Arévalo-Quijada, M., 2009. "Low-cost port competitiveness index: Implementation in the Spanish port system," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 591-598, July.
    8. Cullinane Kevin & Song Dong-Wook & Ji Ping & Wang Teng-Fei, 2004. "An Application of DEA Windows Analysis to Container Port Production Efficiency," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(2), pages 1-23, June.
    9. Assunta Di Vaio & Luisa Varriale, 2018. "Management Innovation for Environmental Sustainability in Seaports: Managerial Accounting Instruments and Training for Competitive Green Ports beyond the Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-35, March.
    10. Xiaoyong Zhang & Rui Xu & Kaixuan Lu & Zhihang Hao & Zhengchao Chen & Mingyong Cai, 2022. "Resource-Based Port Material Yard Detection with SPPA-Net," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Sedat Baştuğ & Hercules Haralambides & Soner Esmer & Enes Eminoğlu, 2022. "Port competitiveness: Do container terminal operators and liner shipping companies see eye to eye?," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-04046233, HAL.
    12. Laurent Fedi & Alexandre Lavissière & Dawn Russel & David Swanson, 2019. "The facilitating role of IT systems for legal compliance: the case of Port Community Systems and container Verified Gross Mass (VGM)," Post-Print hal-02062142, HAL.
    13. Seguí, Xavier & Puig, Martí & Quintieri, Eugenio & Wooldridge, Chris & Darbra, Rosa Mari, 2016. "New environmental performance baseline for inland ports: A benchmark for the European inland port sector," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 29-40.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. Sahraoui & N.K. Tran & Y. Tliche & A. Kacem & A. Taghipour, 2023. "Examining ICT Innovation for Sustainable Terminal Operations in Developing Countries: A Case Study of the Port of Radès in Tunisia," Post-Print hal-04435475, HAL.
    2. Di Vaio, Assunta & Varriale, Luisa & Alvino, Federico, 2018. "Key performance indicators for developing environmentally sustainable and energy efficient ports: Evidence from Italy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 229-240.
    3. Edvard Tijan & Adrijana Agatić & Marija Jović & Saša Aksentijević, 2019. "Maritime National Single Window—A Prerequisite for Sustainable Seaport Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Son-Tung Le & Trung-Hieu Nguyen, 2023. "The Development of Green Ports in Emerging Nations: A Case Study of Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Chun-Yu Lin & Gui-Lin Dai & Su Wang & Xiu-Mei Fu, 2022. "The Evolution of Green Port Research: A Knowledge Mapping Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    6. Figueiredo De Oliveira, Gabriel & Cariou, Pierre, 2015. "The impact of competition on container port (in)efficiency," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 124-133.
    7. George E. Halkos & Nickolaos G. Tzeremes, 2015. "Measuring Seaports' Productivity: A Malmquist Productivity Index Decomposition Approach," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 49(2), pages 355-376, April.
    8. Quintano, Claudio & Mazzocchi, Paolo & Rocca, Antonella, 2021. "Evaluation of the eco-efficiency of territorial districts with seaport economic activities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    9. Ulpan Tokkozhina & Ana Lucia Martins & Joao C. Ferreira, 2023. "Multi-tier supply chain behavior with blockchain technology: evidence from a frozen fish supply chain," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1562-1576, September.
    10. Kevin X. Li & Tae-Joon Park & Paul Tae-Woo Lee & Heather McLaughlin & Wenming Shi, 2018. "Container Transport Network for Sustainable Development in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.
    11. Santiago Herrera & Gaobo Pang, 2008. "Eficiency of Infrastructure: The Case of Container Ports," Economia, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics], vol. 9(1), pages 165-194.
    12. Badri GECHBAIA & Amiran TSILOSANI, 2023. "Prospects for intermodal and container transportation for Georgia's integration into the global transport market," Access Journal, Access Press Publishing House, vol. 4(1), pages 85-101, October.
    13. Laima Gerlitz & Christopher Meyer, 2021. "Small and Medium-Sized Ports in the TEN-T Network and Nexus of Europe’s Twin Transition: The Way towards Sustainable and Digital Port Service Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, April.
    14. Samer Matta & Michael Bleaney & Simon Appleton, 2022. "The economic impact of political instability and mass civil protest," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 253-270, March.
    15. Phoebe W. Ishak & Mohammad Reza Farzanegan, 2022. "Oil price shocks, protest, and the shadow economy: Is there a mitigation effect?," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 298-321, July.
    16. Angela Stefania Bergantino & Enrico Musso, 2011. "A Multi-step Approach to Model the Relative Efficiency of European Ports: The Role of Regulation and Other Non-discretionary Factors," Chapters, in: Kevin Cullinane (ed.), International Handbook of Maritime Economics, chapter 18, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Kammoun Rabeb, 2018. "The Technical Efficiency of Tunisian Ports: Comparing Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis Scores," Logistics, Supply Chain, Sustainability and Global Challenges, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 73-84, October.
    18. Hanyu Lu & Lufei Huang, 2021. "Optimization of Shore Power Deployment in Green Ports Considering Government Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    19. Goran Radoš, 2024. "Impact of labour income in gross value added on migrations in Bosnia and Herzegovina," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 42(1), pages 149-166.
    20. Tovar, Beatriz & Wall, Alan, 2022. "The relationship between port-level maritime connectivity and efficiency," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:9123-:d:1164342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.