IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p8046-d1147475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Proposal of a Tool to Assess Psychosocial Benefits of Nature-Based Interventions for Sustainable Built Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Karmele Herranz-Pascual

    (TECNALIA-BRTA (Basque Research & Technology Alliance), Parque Científico y Tecnológico de Bizkaia, Astondo Bidea, Edificio 700, 48160 Derio, Spain)

  • Igone Garcia-Pérez

    (TECNALIA-BRTA (Basque Research & Technology Alliance), Parque Científico y Tecnológico de Bizkaia, Astondo Bidea, Edificio 700, 48160 Derio, Spain)

  • Saioa Zorita

    (TECNALIA-BRTA (Basque Research & Technology Alliance), Parque Científico y Tecnológico de Bizkaia, Astondo Bidea, Edificio 700, 48160 Derio, Spain)

  • Carolina García-Madruga

    (TECNALIA-BRTA (Basque Research & Technology Alliance), Parque Científico y Tecnológico de Bizkaia, Astondo Bidea, Edificio 700, 48160 Derio, Spain)

  • Carolina Cantergiani

    (TECNALIA-BRTA (Basque Research & Technology Alliance), Parque Científico y Tecnológico de Bizkaia, Astondo Bidea, Edificio 700, 48160 Derio, Spain)

  • Julita Skodra

    (Institut für Public Health und Pflegeforschung (IPP), Universitaet Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany)

  • Ioseba Iraurgi

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Deusto, 48007 Bilbao, Spain)

Abstract

The use of nature-based solutions (NbS) in urban regeneration processes has been demonstrated as a multifunctional solution to increase the resilience of the built environment, contributing to improved environmental quality and health and wellbeing, and providing empowerment to communities facing natural hazards. However, when it comes to the assessment of psychological wellbeing and social benefits, existing evidence is still limited. To contribute to the knowledge of NbS’ psychosocial benefits, it is necessary to develop and test assessment tools to contribute to a common NbS monitoring framework. In this paper, we describe the development of a psychosocial benefit assessment tool for nature-based interventions in the urban regeneration processes. This tool has been developed within the framework of the H2020 CLEVER-Cities project through a participatory and co-design process, considering advanced sustainability paradigms, such as Regenerative Sustainability and Sensory Sustainability Science. This tool is structured around two dimensions, (1) perceived health and wellbeing and (2) social benefits, which refer to 13 attributes, assessed through 24 items. The Delphi method was used to validate the assessment tool, in which a multidisciplinary panel of experts participated. The results indicate that it has good face and content validity, concluding with the potential applicability of this tool in different contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Karmele Herranz-Pascual & Igone Garcia-Pérez & Saioa Zorita & Carolina García-Madruga & Carolina Cantergiani & Julita Skodra & Ioseba Iraurgi, 2023. "A Proposal of a Tool to Assess Psychosocial Benefits of Nature-Based Interventions for Sustainable Built Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8046-:d:1147475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8046/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8046/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beatriz Mayor & Helen Toxopeus & Siobhan McQuaid & Edoardo Croci & Benedetta Lucchitta & Suhana E. Reddy & Aitziber Egusquiza & Monica A. Altamirano & Tamara Trumbic & Andreas Tuerk & Gemma García & E, 2021. "State of the Art and Latest Advances in Exploring Business Models for Nature-Based Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Harald Heinrichs, 2021. "Teaching Sustainable Development in a Sensory and Artful Way—Concepts, Methods, and Examples," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Harald Heinrichs, 2019. "Strengthening Sensory Sustainability Science—Theoretical and Methodological Considerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Fitzgibbons, Joanne & Mitchell, Carrie L., 2019. "Just urban futures? Exploring equity in “100 Resilient Cities”," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 648-659.
    5. Marcelo Enrique Conti & Massimo Battaglia & Mario Calabrese & Cristina Simone, 2021. "Fostering Sustainable Cities through Resilience Thinking: The Role of Nature-Based Solutions (NBSs): Lessons Learned from Two Italian Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Yangang Xing & Phil Jones & Iain Donnison, 2017. "Characterisation of Nature-Based Solutions for the Built Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Iván González-Márquez & Víctor M. Toledo, 2020. "Sustainability Science: A Paradigm in Crisis?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mairéad Hurley & Joseph Roche, 2023. "RISING Strong: Sustainability through Art, Science, and Collective Community Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Leonhard Hennen & Jürgen Kopfmüller & Maria Maia & Linda Nierling & Constanze Scherz, 2023. "Ways towards Transformation—Conceptual Approaches and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-27, October.
    3. Carlo Rega & Alessandro Bonifazi, 2020. "The Rise of Resilience in Spatial Planning: A Journey through Disciplinary Boundaries and Contested Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Ellen Banzhaf & Sally Anderson & Gwendoline Grandin & Richard Hardiman & Anne Jensen & Laurence Jones & Julius Knopp & Gregor Levin & Duncan Russel & Wanben Wu & Jun Yang & Marianne Zandersen, 2022. "Urban-Rural Dependencies and Opportunities to Design Nature-Based Solutions for Resilience in Europe and China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Alla Mostepaniuk & Turgay Akalin & Mohammad Reza Parish, 2023. "Practices Pursuing the Sustainability of A Healthcare Organization: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Umberto Pernice & Francesca Coccon & Fabienne Horneman & Caterina Dabalà & Silvia Torresan & Laura Puertolas, 2024. "Co-Developing Business Plans for Upscaled Coastal Nature-Based Solutions Restoration: An Application to the Venice Lagoon (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-39, October.
    7. Simon Stork & Rolf Morgenstern & Bernd Pölling & Jan-Henning Feil, 2023. "Holistic Business Model Conceptualisation—Capturing Sustainability Contributions Illustrated by Nature-Based Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Carley C. Reynolds & Francisco J. Escobedo & Nicola Clerici & Jorge Zea-Camaño, 2017. "Does “Greening” of Neotropical Cities Considerably Mitigate Carbon Dioxide Emissions? The Case of Medellin, Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-16, May.
    9. Daniel Mora-Melià & Carlos S. López-Aburto & Pablo Ballesteros-Pérez & Pedro Muñoz-Velasco, 2018. "Viability of Green Roofs as a Flood Mitigation Element in the Central Region of Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Mudoh Mbah & Anna Franz, 2021. "Revitalization and Branding of Rural Communities in Cameroon Using a Circular Approach for Sustainable Development—A Proposal for the Batibo Municipality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    11. Xiukang Wang, 2022. "Managing Land Carrying Capacity: Key to Achieving Sustainable Production Systems for Food Security," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Leah V. Gibbons, 2020. "Regenerative—The New Sustainable?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Jurjonas, Matthew & Seekamp, Erin & Rivers, Louie & Cutts, Bethany, 2020. "Uncovering climate (in)justice with an adaptive capacity assessment: A multiple case study in rural coastal North Carolina," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    14. Harald Heinrichs, 2021. "Aesthetic Expertise for Sustainable Development: Envisioning Artful Scientific Policy Advice," World, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-13, February.
    15. Basma Hamrouni & Abdelhabib Bourouis & Ahmed Korichi & Mohsen Brahmi, 2021. "Explainable Ontology-Based Intelligent Decision Support System for Business Model Design and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-28, September.
    16. Pia Minixhofer & Rosemarie Stangl, 2021. "Green Infrastructures and the Consideration of Their Soil-Related Ecosystem Services in Urban Areas—A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    17. Marie De Groeve & Eda Kale & Scott Allan Orr & Tim De Kock, 2023. "Preliminary Experimental Laboratory Methods to Analyse the Insulation Capacity of Vertical Greening on Temperature and Relative Humidity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-13, July.
    18. Aitziber Egusquiza & Maider Arana-Bollar & Amaia Sopelana & Javier Babí Almenar, 2021. "Conceptual and Operational Integration of Governance, Financing, and Business Models for Urban Nature-Based Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-28, October.
    19. Chloé Duffaut & Nathalie Frascaria-Lacoste & Pierre-Antoine Versini, 2022. "Barriers and Levers for the Implantation of Sustainable Nature-Based Solutions in Cities: Insights from France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    20. Hanson, Helena I. & Wickenberg, Björn & Alkan Olsson, Johanna, 2020. "Working on the boundaries—How do science use and interpret the nature-based solution concept?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8046-:d:1147475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.