IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p8022-d1147187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Seismic Fragility Assessment Method for Urban Function Spatial Units: A Case Study of Xuzhou City

Author

Listed:
  • Zhitao Fei

    (Faculty of Architecture, Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
    Institute of Earthquake Resistance and Disaster Reduction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
    Beijing Center for Urban and Engineering Safety and Disaster Reduction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Xiaodong Guo

    (Faculty of Architecture, Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
    Institute of Earthquake Resistance and Disaster Reduction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
    Beijing Center for Urban and Engineering Safety and Disaster Reduction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Janes Ouma Odongo

    (Faculty of Architecture, Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
    Institute of Earthquake Resistance and Disaster Reduction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
    Beijing Center for Urban and Engineering Safety and Disaster Reduction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Donghui Ma

    (Faculty of Architecture, Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
    Institute of Earthquake Resistance and Disaster Reduction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
    Beijing Center for Urban and Engineering Safety and Disaster Reduction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Yuanyuan Ren

    (Faculty of Architecture, Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Jiajia Wu

    (Faculty of Architecture, Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Wei Wang

    (Faculty of Architecture, Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
    Institute of Earthquake Resistance and Disaster Reduction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
    Beijing Center for Urban and Engineering Safety and Disaster Reduction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Junyi Zhu

    (Faculty of Architecture, Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

Abstract

Cities that experience earthquake disasters face a lot of uncertainties and unsustainability resulting from the fragility of their infrastructure, which should be considered in engineering. This study proposes a seismic fragility assessment framework for urban functional spatial units in order to improve the traditional structural fragility assessment criteria that are currently applied in urban planning. First, appropriate spatial units are classified for the study area, the functional categories of the study area are determined using urban Point of Interest (POI) data, and the functional proportion of the spatial units is calculated. Secondly, considering the classification of different seismic fortification levels represented by different construction ages, and considering the possible building forms and HAZUS’s classification system of building structures in order to establish the correlation between building functions and building structures, the methods of a field survey and a questionnaire survey are adopted to match the functions with the most likely building structures. After this, based on the assumption of the lognormal distribution of ground motion intensity, a mixed method is adopted to calculate the mean value μ ¯ for the fragility of functional space units. The Monte Carlo method is then used to discretize the data and statistically obtain the standard deviation β ¯ for the fragility of functional space units, and the fragility curve is then fitted. A district in Xuzhou City, China, was used as a case study to verify this assessment framework. The results showed that: (1) the fragility of functional space units was greatly affected by the proportion of defense standards in different periods in the unit, which reflected the average level of fragility within the unit. (2) The unit loss index of units built after 2001 with a proportion of less than 50% is basically above the average loss level of the study area. (3) The simulated damage ratio of the assessment results under the three levels, namely frequent earthquake, fortified earthquake and rare earthquake, is consistent with the previously experienced earthquake damage. The paper concludes that it is helpful to design and utilize seismic fragility predicting formulas and technologies at the functional spatial unit level for urban planning, which is meaningful for the formulation of planning strategies, reducing risks to infrastructure and delivering sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhitao Fei & Xiaodong Guo & Janes Ouma Odongo & Donghui Ma & Yuanyuan Ren & Jiajia Wu & Wei Wang & Junyi Zhu, 2023. "A Seismic Fragility Assessment Method for Urban Function Spatial Units: A Case Study of Xuzhou City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8022-:d:1147187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8022/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8022/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ya Li & Chunxia Liu & Yuechen Li, 2022. "Identification of Urban Functional Areas and Their Mixing Degree Using Point of Interest Analyses," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Shaghayegh Karimzadeh & Aysegul Askan & Murat Altug Erberik & Ahmet Yakut, 2018. "Seismic damage assessment based on regional synthetic ground motion dataset: a case study for Erzincan, Turkey," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(3), pages 1371-1397, July.
    3. Hualin Cheng & Zhiyi Chen & Yu Huang, 2022. "Quantitative physical model of vulnerability of buildings to urban flow slides in construction solid waste landfills: a case study of the 2015 Shenzhen flow slide," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 112(2), pages 1567-1587, June.
    4. Dane Wiebe & Daniel Cox, 2014. "Application of fragility curves to estimate building damage and economic loss at a community scale: a case study of Seaside, Oregon," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 71(3), pages 2043-2061, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chris Lonergan & Nick Hedley & John Clague, 2015. "A visibility-based assessment of tsunami evacuation signs in Seaside, Oregon," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 78(1), pages 41-59, August.
    2. Tomoyuki Takabatake & Philippe St-Germain & Ioan Nistor & Jacob Stolle & Tomoya Shibayama, 2019. "Numerical modelling of coastal inundation from Cascadia Subduction Zone tsunamis and implications for coastal communities on western Vancouver Island, Canada," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 98(1), pages 267-291, August.
    3. Fatma Yerlikaya-Özkurt & Aysegul Askan, 2020. "Prediction of potential seismic damage using classification and regression trees: a case study on earthquake damage databases from Turkey," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(3), pages 3163-3180, September.
    4. Chris Lonergan & Nicholas Hedley, 2015. "Navigating the future of tsunami risk communication: using dimensionality, interactivity and situatedness to interface with society," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 78(1), pages 179-201, August.
    5. Dylan Sanderson & Sabarethinam Kameshwar & Nathanael Rosenheim & Daniel Cox, 2021. "Deaggregation of multi-hazard damages, losses, risks, and connectivity: an application to the joint seismic-tsunami hazard at Seaside, Oregon," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(2), pages 1821-1847, November.
    6. Tian Liang & Peng Du & Fei Yang & Yuanxia Su & Yinchen Luo & You Wu & Chuanhao Wen, 2022. "Potential Land-Use Conflicts in the Urban Center of Chongqing Based on the “Production–Living–Ecological Space” Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Mehrshad Amini & Dylan R. Sanderson & Daniel T. Cox & Andre R. Barbosa & Nathanael Rosenheim, 2024. "Methodology to incorporate seismic damage and debris to evaluate strategies to reduce life safety risk for multi-hazard earthquake and tsunami," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(10), pages 9187-9222, August.
    8. Boakye, Jessica & Guidotti, Roberto & Gardoni, Paolo & Murphy, Colleen, 2022. "The role of transportation infrastructure on the impact of natural hazards on communities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    9. Shutian Zhou & Guofang Zhai & Yijun Shi & Yuwen Lu, 2020. "Urban Seismic Risk Assessment by Integrating Direct Economic Loss and Loss of Statistical Life: An Empirical Study in Xiamen, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-21, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8022-:d:1147187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.