IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p385-d1015644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Operation Platform on the Energy Consumption of Container Handling

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaojun Li

    (Policy Research Center, Tianjin Research Institute for Water Transport Engineering, M.O.T., Tianjin 300456, China
    National Engineering Research Center of Port Hydraulic Construction Technology, Tianjin 300456, China)

  • Ran Zhou

    (Policy Research Center, Tianjin Research Institute for Water Transport Engineering, M.O.T., Tianjin 300456, China
    National Engineering Research Center of Port Hydraulic Construction Technology, Tianjin 300456, China)

  • Lequn Zhu

    (Policy Research Center, Tianjin Research Institute for Water Transport Engineering, M.O.T., Tianjin 300456, China
    National Engineering Research Center of Port Hydraulic Construction Technology, Tianjin 300456, China)

Abstract

Because container terminals are facing pressure to achieve carbon neutrality in China, saving energy has become an important objective of container terminals. This paper analyzed the movement path of containers between the quay carne and the yard, and found that paths in the vertical direction existed, requiring unnecessary energy consumption. To solve the unnecessary energy consumption problem, a completely new work mode called the high platform operation mode was proposed. In this new mode, a high platform is built above the yard and container trucks drive onto the high platform. By building an energy consumption model to compare the energy consumption of the traditional and new modes, we found that the new mode is able to save 1.478 kWh of electricity compared to the traditional mode when handling one container. A terminal company in Tianjin Port was taken as an example to examine and validate the efficiency of the proposed mode. The computational results indicate that the electricity saved in 12 years would be able to cover the cost of building the high platform, meaning that the new mode could reduce container terminals’ energy consumption and accelerate the achievement of carbon neutrality.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaojun Li & Ran Zhou & Lequn Zhu, 2022. "The Influence of Operation Platform on the Energy Consumption of Container Handling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:385-:d:1015644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/385/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/385/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhou, Chenhao & Lee, Byung Kwon & Li, Haobin, 2020. "Integrated optimization on yard crane scheduling and vehicle positioning at container yards," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. Gharehgozli, Amir Hossein & Vernooij, Floris Gerardus & Zaerpour, Nima, 2017. "A simulation study of the performance of twin automated stacking cranes at a seaport container terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 108-128.
    3. Raymond K. Cheung & Chung-Lun Li & Wuqin Lin, 2002. "Interblock Crane Deployment in Container Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 79-93, February.
    4. Zhang, Xiaoju & Zeng, Qingcheng & Yang, Zhongzhen, 2016. "Modeling the mixed storage strategy for quay crane double cycling in container terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 171-187.
    5. Chen, Lu & Langevin, André & Lu, Zhiqiang, 2013. "Integrated scheduling of crane handling and truck transportation in a maritime container terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 142-152.
    6. Nanxi Wang & Daofang Chang & Xiaowei Shi & Jun Yuan & Yinping Gao, 2019. "Analysis and Design of Typical Automated Container Terminals Layout Considering Carbon Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-40, May.
    7. Nishimura, Etsuko & Imai, Akio & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2005. "Yard trailer routing at a maritime container terminal," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 53-76, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Julian Neugebauer & Leonard Heilig & Stefan Voß, 2024. "Digital Twins in the Context of Seaports and Terminal Facilities," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 821-917, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hang Yu & Yiyun Deng & Leijie Zhang & Xin Xiao & Caimao Tan, 2022. "Yard Operations and Management in Automated Container Terminals: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Di Luan & Mingjing Zhao & Qianru Zhao & Nan Wang, 2021. "Modelling of integrated scheduling problem of capacitated equipment systems with a multi-lane road network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-38, June.
    3. Raeesi, Ramin & Sahebjamnia, Navid & Mansouri, S. Afshin, 2023. "The synergistic effect of operational research and big data analytics in greening container terminal operations: A review and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 943-973.
    4. Gharehgozli, A.H. & Roy, D. & de Koster, M.B.M., 2014. "Sea Container Terminals," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-009-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    5. Gharehgozli, Amir & Zaerpour, Nima, 2018. "Stacking outbound barge containers in an automated deep-sea terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 977-995.
    6. Facchini, F. & Digiesi, S. & Mossa, G., 2020. "Optimal dry port configuration for container terminals: A non-linear model for sustainable decision making," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 164-178.
    7. Damla Kizilay & Deniz Türsel Eliiyi, 2021. "A comprehensive review of quay crane scheduling, yard operations and integrations thereof in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-42, March.
    8. Gharehgozli, Amir & Yu, Yugang & de Koster, René & Du, Shaofu, 2019. "Sequencing storage and retrieval requests in a container block with multiple open locations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 261-284.
    9. Amir Gharehgozli & Debjit Roy & Suruchika Saini & Jan-Kees Ommeren, 2023. "Loading and unloading trains at the landside of container terminals," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(3), pages 549-575, September.
    10. Zhou, Chenhao & Lee, Byung Kwon & Li, Haobin, 2020. "Integrated optimization on yard crane scheduling and vehicle positioning at container yards," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    11. Anne Ehleiter & Florian Jaehn, 2018. "Scheduling crossover cranes at container terminals during seaside peak times," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 899-932, December.
    12. Yanling Chu & Xiaoju Zhang & Zhongzhen Yang, 2017. "Multiple quay cranes scheduling for double cycling in container terminals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, July.
    13. Domenico Gattuso & Domenica Savia Pellicanò, 2023. "HUs Fleet Management in an Automated Container Port: Assessment by a Simulation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Bokyung Kim & Geunsub Kim & Moohong Kang, 2022. "Study on Comparing the Performance of Fully Automated Container Terminals during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-13, August.
    15. Fotuhi, Fateme & Huynh, Nathan & Vidal, Jose M. & Xie, Yuanchang, 2013. "Modeling yard crane operators as reinforcement learning agents," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 3-12.
    16. Asadi, Amin & Nurre Pinkley, Sarah, 2021. "A stochastic scheduling, allocation, and inventory replenishment problem for battery swap stations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    17. Robenek, Tomáš & Umang, Nitish & Bierlaire, Michel & Ropke, Stefan, 2014. "A branch-and-price algorithm to solve the integrated berth allocation and yard assignment problem in bulk ports," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 399-411.
    18. Tierney, Kevin & Voß, Stefan & Stahlbock, Robert, 2014. "A mathematical model of inter-terminal transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 448-460.
    19. Henry Lau & Ying Zhao, 2008. "Integrated scheduling of handling equipment at automated container terminals," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 373-394, March.
    20. Lennart Zey & Dirk Briskorn & Nils Boysen, 2022. "Twin-crane scheduling during seaside workload peaks with a dedicated handshake area," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 3-34, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:385-:d:1015644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.