IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5699-d811241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a Cost-Based Design Model for Spread Footings in Cohesive Soils

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Muneeb Nawaz

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, International Islamic University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Shah Rukh Khan

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, International Islamic University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Rashid Farooq

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, International Islamic University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Naqeeb Nawaz

    (Institute of Civil Engineering, National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Jamil Khan

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, International Islamic University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq

    (College of Engineering and Science, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 8001, Australia
    Institute for Sustainable Industries & Liveable Cities, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 8001, Australia)

  • Rana Faisal Tufail

    (Civil Engineering Department, COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Campus, Wah 47040, Pakistan)

  • Danish Farooq

    (Civil Engineering Department, COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Campus, Wah 47040, Pakistan)

  • Anne W. M. Ng

    (College of Engineering, IT & Environment, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Ellengowan Dr, Brinkin, NT 0810, Australia
    Energy and Resources Institute, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Ellengowan Dr, Brinkin, NT 0810, Australia)

Abstract

The use of cost-effective construction design approaches is an emerging concept in the field of sustainable environments. The design of the foundation for the construction of any infrastructure-related building entails three basic requirements, i.e., serviceability limit state (SLS), ultimate limit state (ULS), and economics. Engineering economy coupled with safety are the two main essentials for a successful construction project. The conventional design approaches are based on hit and trial methods to approach cost-effective design. Additionally, safety requirements are prioritized over the economic aspect of foundation design and do not consider safety requirements and cost simultaneously. This study presents a design approach that considers foundation construction costs while satisfying all the technical requirements of a shallow foundation design. This approach is called an optimization process in which the cost-based isolated foundation design charts were developed based on the field SPT N data. The design charts are the first of their kind for the robust design of foundations and can be used to compare the economic impact of different bearing capacity models. Furthermore, the design framework considers the quantitative impact of the different applied factors of safety values in terms of cost. The results show that Vesic’s equation yields higher values of bearing capacities than Terzaghi and Meyerhof. On the other hand, Vesic’s theory offers a 37.5% reduction in cost as compared to the conventional design approach of the foundation for isolated footing.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Muneeb Nawaz & Shah Rukh Khan & Rashid Farooq & Muhammad Naqeeb Nawaz & Jamil Khan & Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq & Rana Faisal Tufail & Danish Farooq & Anne W. M. Ng, 2022. "Development of a Cost-Based Design Model for Spread Footings in Cohesive Soils," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5699-:d:811241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5699/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5699/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tom Kuhlman & John Farrington, 2010. "What is Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(11), pages 1-13, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu Wang & Roaa H. Latief & Hasan Al-Mosawe & Hussein K. Mohammad & Amjad Albayati & Jonathan Haynes, 2021. "Influence of Iron Filing Waste on the Performance of Warm Mix Asphalt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Badir S. Alsaeed & Dexter V. L. Hunt & Soroosh Sharifi, 2022. "Sustainable Water Resources Management Assessment Frameworks (SWRM-AF) for Arid and Semi-Arid Regions: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-31, November.
    3. Hildegunn Mellesmo Aslaksen & Clare Hildebrandt & Hans Chr. Garmann Johnsen, 2021. "The long-term transformation of the concept of CSR: towards a more comprehensive emphasis on sustainability," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Bruna Ornelas da Costa & Luana Siqueira Andrade & Cíntia Ehlers Botton & Cristine Lima Alberton, 2023. "Effects of a Telehealth Stretching Exercise Program on Pain, Sleep, Depression, and Functionality of Women with Fibromyalgia during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Clinical Trial," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Daan Francois Toerien, 2022. "Linking Entrepreneurial Activities and Community Prosperity/Poverty in United States Counties: Use of the Enterprise Dependency Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Lea Primožič & Andreja Kutnar, 2022. "Sustainability Communication in Global Consumer Brands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Francesco Polese & Luca Carrubbo & Francesco Caputo & Debora Sarno, 2018. "Managing Healthcare Service Ecosystems: Abstracting a Sustainability-Based View from Hospitalization at Home (HaH) Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Oana Țugulea, 2017. "City Brand Personality—Relations with Dimensions and Dimensions Inter-Relations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    9. Maria Iglesias-Mendoza & Akilu Yunusa-Kaltungo & Sara Hadleigh-Dunn & Ashraf Labib, 2021. "Learning How to Learn from Disasters through a Comparative Dichotomy Analysis: Grenfell Tower and Hurricane Katrina Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Alvaro Guitart Martín & Ricardo J. Palomo Zurdo, 2021. "Digital Inability and Social Sustainability in the Face of the Fourth Industrial Revolution: A Proposal of New Non-Financial Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Wenyu Zeng & Shiyong Wu & Wei Chen, 2023. "Studying at a New Remote University Campus: Challenges and Strategies in Students’ Sustainable Self-Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    12. Ozgur Isil & Michael T. Hernke, 2017. "The Triple Bottom Line: A Critical Review from a Transdisciplinary Perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(8), pages 1235-1251, December.
    13. Per Engelseth & Remiguisz Kozlowski & Karolina Kamecka & Lukasz Gawinski & Richard Glavee-Geo, 2021. "Framing Sustainable Healthcare Services," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-15, June.
    14. Ignacio Llanez-Caballero & Luis Ibarra & Angel Peña-Quintal & Glendy Catzín-Contreras & Pedro Ponce & Arturo Molina & Ricardo Ramirez-Mendoza, 2023. "The “Smart” Concept from an Electrical Sustainability Viewpoint," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, March.
    15. Svatava Janoušková & Tomáš Hák & Bedřich Moldan, 2018. "Global SDGs Assessments: Helping or Confusing Indicators?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, May.
    16. Juliana Segura-Salazar & Luís Marcelo Tavares, 2018. "Sustainability in the Minerals Industry: Seeking a Consensus on Its Meaning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-38, May.
    17. Aleksandra Djukić & Jelena Marić & Branislav Antonić & Vladimir Kovač & Jugoslav Joković & Nikola Dinkić, 2020. "The Evaluation of Urban Renewal Waterfront Development: The Case of the Sava Riverfront in Belgrade, Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-16, August.
    18. Samar Ben Romdhane & Sang Lee & Salem Al-Shaebi, 2023. "Enhancing Sustainability Communication among UAE’s Higher Education Students: The Relationship between Sustainable Living Knowledge and Intention to Live Sustainably," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-14, August.
    19. Monika Spychalska-Wojtkiewicz, 2020. "The Relation between Sustainable Development Trends and Customer Value Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-18, July.
    20. Pattarin Sanguankaew & Vichita Vathanophas Ractham, 2019. "Bibliometric Review of Research on Knowledge Management and Sustainability, 1994–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-20, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5699-:d:811241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.