IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5297-d803951.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Liming Intensity on Fractions of Humified Organic Carbon in Acid Soil: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Ieva Mockeviciene

    (Institute of Agriculture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Akademija, 58344 Kedainiai, Lithuania)

  • Danute Karcauskiene

    (Institute of Agriculture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Akademija, 58344 Kedainiai, Lithuania)

  • Alvyra Slepetiene

    (Institute of Agriculture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Akademija, 58344 Kedainiai, Lithuania)

  • Monika Vilkiene

    (Institute of Agriculture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Akademija, 58344 Kedainiai, Lithuania)

  • Regina Repsiene

    (Institute of Agriculture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Akademija, 58344 Kedainiai, Lithuania)

  • Zita Braziene

    (Institute of Agriculture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Akademija, 58344 Kedainiai, Lithuania)

  • Olga Anne

    (Engineering Department, Marine Technology and Natural Sciences Faculty, Klaipeda University, 92295 Klaipeda, Lithuania)

Abstract

Soil pH influences the composition and activities of microbial communities, which are driving the transformations of soil organic carbon (SOC). However, the effect of liming on SOC sequestration remains controversial. Evaluation of the effect of liming on SOC and humified carbon fractions was one of the most important tasks of this work. Studies were carried out in the long-term field experiment using slaked-lime rates of 0.5 or 2.0, depending on the soil hydrolytic acidity. It was determined that liming did not increase SOC content, but led to redistribution of SOC. The amount of mobile humic acids in the soil decreased while the intensity of liming increased. When liming at the 2.0 rate, the lowest HA1 level (0.251 g kg −1 C) and highest amount of HA2 (0.21 g kg −1 C) were found. It could be stated that soil liming, as a measure, allows the stabilization of HA and FA by the cation bridging mechanism. Liming resulted in slower mineralization of SOC and at the same time it also resulted in carbon sequestration in the form of valuable humic acids. An important consistent pattern of carbon transformation was identified in this study and can be applied in selecting of the most suitable combination of agricultural practices, promoting carbon sequestration and soil fertility.

Suggested Citation

  • Ieva Mockeviciene & Danute Karcauskiene & Alvyra Slepetiene & Monika Vilkiene & Regina Repsiene & Zita Braziene & Olga Anne, 2022. "Influence of Liming Intensity on Fractions of Humified Organic Carbon in Acid Soil: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5297-:d:803951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5297/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5297/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Colin Averill & Benjamin L. Turner & Adrien C. Finzi, 2014. "Mycorrhiza-mediated competition between plants and decomposers drives soil carbon storage," Nature, Nature, vol. 505(7484), pages 543-545, January.
    2. Shilong Piao & Jingyun Fang & Philippe Ciais & Philippe Peylin & Yao Huang & Stephen Sitch & Tao Wang, 2009. "The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China," Nature, Nature, vol. 458(7241), pages 1009-1013, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dongwei Liu & Shanlong Li & Weixing Zhu & Yongyang Wang & Shasha Zhang & Yunting Fang, 2023. "Storage and Stability of Soil Organic Carbon in Two Temperate Forests in Northeastern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Jieming Chou & Yidan Hao & Yuan Xu & Weixing Zhao & Yuanmeng Li & Haofeng Jin, 2023. "Forest Carbon Sequestration Potential in China under Different SSP-RCP Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-12, April.
    3. Guoyong Yan & Chunnan Fan & Junqiang Zheng & Guancheng Liu & Jinghua Yu & Zhongling Guo & Wei Cao & Lihua Wang & Wenjie Wang & Qingfan Meng & Junhui Zhang & Yan Li & Jinping Zheng & Xiaoyang Cui & Xia, 2024. "Forest carbon stocks increase with higher dominance of ectomycorrhizal trees in high latitude forests," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Li, Shuoshuo & Liu, Yaobin & Wei, Guoen & Bi, Mo & He, Bao-Jie, 2024. "Carbon surplus or carbon deficit under land use transformation in China?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    5. Zhen, Wei & Qin, Quande & Miao, Lu, 2023. "The greenhouse gas rebound effect from increased energy efficiency across China's staple crops," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    6. Luyi Qiu & Kunying Niu & Wei He & Yaqi Hu, 2023. "Two Contribution Paths of Carbon Neutrality: Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Sinks and Anthropogenic Carbon Emission Reduction—A Case of Chongqing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Kai Yin & Dengsheng Lu & Yichen Tian & Qianjun Zhao & Chao Yuan, 2014. "Evaluation of Carbon and Oxygen Balances in Urban Ecosystems Using Land Use/Land Cover and Statistical Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-27, December.
    8. Qi Fu & Mengfan Gao & Yue Wang & Tinghui Wang & Xu Bi & Jinhua Chen, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Patterns and Drivers of the Carbon Budget in the Yangtze River Delta Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Jin, Ming & Han, Xulong & Li, Mingyu, 2023. "Trade-offs of multiple urban ecosystem services based on land-use scenarios in the Tumen River cross-border area," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 482(C).
    10. Wei Wang & Wenjing Zeng & Weile Chen & Hui Zeng & Jingyun Fang, 2013. "Soil Respiration and Organic Carbon Dynamics with Grassland Conversions to Woodlands in Temperate China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-10, August.
    11. Guo, Wei & Lv, Ling & Zhao, Xuesheng & Cui, Ximin & Rienow, Andreas, 2024. "Multiscale coupled development and linkage response evaluation of China's carbon neutrality and sustainable development capability–A quantitative analysis perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    12. Xiaochen Liu & Shuai Wang & Qianlai Zhuang & Xinxin Jin & Zhenxing Bian & Mingyi Zhou & Zhuo Meng & Chunlan Han & Xiaoyu Guo & Wenjuan Jin & Yufei Zhang, 2022. "A Review on Carbon Source and Sink in Arable Land Ecosystems," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, April.
    13. Youngsu Park & Yujun Sun, 2018. "Sustainable Forest Management in North-East Asia: A Comparative Assessment between China and Republic of Korea," International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 7(04), pages 102-114, April.
    14. Claudia Melis & Per-Arvid Wold & Anna Maria Billing & Kathrine Bjørgen & Børge Moe, 2020. "Kindergarten Children’s Perception about the Ecological Roles of Living Organisms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-15, November.
    15. Zhang, Fan & Li, Changsheng & Wang, Zheng & Glidden, Stanley & Grogan, Danielle S. & Li, Xuxiang & Cheng, Yan & Frolking, Steve, 2015. "Modeling impacts of management on farmland soil carbon dynamics along a climate gradient in Northwest China during 1981–2000," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 1-10.
    16. Mingjie Tian & Zhun Chen & Wei Wang & Taizheng Chen & Haiying Cui, 2022. "Land-Use Carbon Emissions in the Yellow River Basin from 2000 to 2020: Spatio-Temporal Patterns and Driving Mechanisms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Zhang, Yan & Li, Juan & Fath, Brian D. & Zheng, Hongmei & Xia, Linlin, 2015. "Analysis of urban carbon metabolic processes and a description of sectoral characteristics: A case study of Beijing," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 316(C), pages 144-154.
    18. Cong Zhang & Xiaojun Yao & Guoyu Wang & Huian Jin & Te Sha & Xinde Chu & Juan Zhang & Juan Cao, 2022. "Temporal and Spatial Variation of Land Use and Vegetation in the Three–North Shelter Forest Program Area from 2000 to 2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    19. Zhencheng Xing & Yanyan Ma & Lan Luo & Haikun Wang, 2024. "Harmonizing economies and ecologies: Towards an equitable provincial carbon quota allocation for China’s peak emissions," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    20. Haowei Ni & Han Hu & Constantin M. Zohner & Weigen Huang & Ji Chen & Yishen Sun & Jixian Ding & Jizhong Zhou & Xiaoyuan Yan & Jiabao Zhang & Yuting Liang & Thomas W. Crowther, 2024. "Effects of winter soil warming on crop biomass carbon loss from organic matter degradation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5297-:d:803951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.