IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p4967-d798371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Dynamic Accounting Information System on Organizational Resilience: The Mediating Role of Business Processes Capabilities

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Saleh Al-Matari

    (School of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Management, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
    Faculty of Commerce and Economics, Sana’a University, Sana’a 15542, Yemen)

  • Rozita Amiruddin

    (School of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Management, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Khairul Azman Aziz

    (School of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Management, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Mohammed A. Al-Sharafi

    (Department of Information Systems, Azman Hashim International Business School, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai 81310, Johor, Malaysia)

Abstract

For decades, one of the main concerns of both practitioners and academics has been the business value of dynamic accounting information systems (DAIS). A number of studies have demonstrated the positive effects of information systems capability on overall organizational performance, but our understanding of the business processes capabilities through which such gains are achieved remains limited due to a lack of focus on the turbulent business environment. As a result, the research on information systems continues to debate such a connection. The role of business process capabilities in modulating the link between dynamic AIS capability and organizational resilience was investigated in this study. Our results show that, while firm-wide dynamic AIS capability has characteristics of flexible AIS, complement BI system, and AIS-related human resource competency, the impact on organizational resilience is positively affected by mediation of business process capabilities based on 144 matched questionnaires selected from large companies from various sectors listed on the Bursa Malaysia. Our results also suggest that dynamic AIS capability has an impact on organizational resilience. According to the Resource-Based Theory (RBT) and dynamic capabilities view (DCV) viewpoints, there is a link between dynamic AIS and business process capacity to improve organizational resilience. The findings strongly support the claim that an organization’s dynamic AIS capabilities—both flexible AIS, complementary business intelligence (BI) system, and AIS-related human resource competency—can help an organization improve its resilience. This research’s practical and theoretical ramifications as well as its limitations are examined.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Saleh Al-Matari & Rozita Amiruddin & Khairul Azman Aziz & Mohammed A. Al-Sharafi, 2022. "The Impact of Dynamic Accounting Information System on Organizational Resilience: The Mediating Role of Business Processes Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:4967-:d:798371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/4967/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/4967/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert M. Grant, 1996. "Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 375-387, August.
    2. Gautam Ray & Jay B. Barney & Waleed A. Muhanna, 2004. "Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource‐based view," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 23-37, January.
    3. Mikalef, Patrick & Pateli, Adamantia, 2017. "Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-16.
    4. Arun Rai & Xinlin Tang, 2010. "Leveraging IT Capabilities and Competitive Process Capabilities for the Management of Interorganizational Relationship Portfolios," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 516-542, September.
    5. Carmela Barbera & Enrico Guarini & Ileana Steccolini, 2020. "How do governments cope with austerity? The roles of accounting in shaping governmental financial resilience," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(3), pages 529-558, March.
    6. Elbashir, Mohamed Z. & Collier, Philip A. & Davern, Michael J., 2008. "Measuring the effects of business intelligence systems: The relationship between business process and organizational performance," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 135-153.
    7. Peng, Jianping & Quan, Jing & Zhang, Guoying & Dubinsky, Alan J., 2016. "Mediation effect of business process and supply chain management capabilities on the impact of IT on firm performance: Evidence from Chinese firms," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 89-96.
    8. Rahimi, Fatemeh & Møller, Charles & Hvam, Lars, 2016. "Business process management and IT management: The missing integration," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 142-154.
    9. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    10. Muhammad Irfan & Mingzheng Wang & Naeem Akhtar, 2019. "Impact of IT capabilities on supply chain capabilities and organizational agility: a dynamic capability view," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 113-128, December.
    11. Sarv Devaraj & Rajiv Kohli, 2003. "Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 273-289, March.
    12. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Jeffrey A. Martin, 2000. "Dynamic capabilities: what are they?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1105-1121, October.
    13. Roberto Aringhieri & Giuliana Carello & Daniela Morale, 2016. "Supporting decision making to improve the performance of an Italian Emergency Medical Service," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(1), pages 131-148, January.
    14. Paul A. Pavlou & Omar A. El Sawy, 2006. "From IT Leveraging Competence to Competitive Advantage in Turbulent Environments: The Case of New Product Development," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 198-227, September.
    15. Roberto Aringhieri & Giuliana Carello & Daniela Morale, 2016. "Supporting decision making to improve the performance of an Italian Emergency Medical Service," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(1), pages 131-148, January.
    16. Parker, Hamieda & Ameen, Khadija, 2018. "The role of resilience capabilities in shaping how firms respond to disruptions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 535-541.
    17. Shubashini Rathina Velu & Abdullah Al Mamun & Thavamaran Kanesan & Naeem Hayat & Sharmini Gopinathan, 2019. "Effect of Information System Artifacts on Organizational Resilience: A Study among Malaysian SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, June.
    18. Mohammed A. Al-Sharafi & Fadi A.T. Herzallah & Qasim Alajmi & Muriati Mukhtar & Ruzaini Abdullah Arshah & Derar Eleyan, 2020. "Information culture effect on e-commerce adoption in small and medium enterprises: a structural equation modelling approach," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 35(4), pages 415-438.
    19. Kanellou, Alexandra & Spathis, Charalambos, 2013. "Accounting benefits and satisfaction in an ERP environment," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 209-234.
    20. Octavian Dospinescu & Nicoleta Dospinescu, 2020. "Workaholism in IT: An Analysis of the Influence Factors," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12, November.
    21. Segars, AH & Grover, V, 1994. "Strategic group analysis: A methodological approach for exploring the industry level impact of information technology," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 13-34, January.
    22. Aydiner, Arafat Salih & Tatoglu, Ekrem & Bayraktar, Erkan & Zaim, Selim & Delen, Dursun, 2019. "Business analytics and firm performance: The mediating role of business process performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 228-237.
    23. Louis Raymond & Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann, 1982. "Information Systems in Small Business: Are They Used in Managerial Decisions?," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 6(4), pages 20-26, April.
    24. Thomas C. Powell & Anne Dent‐Micallef, 1997. "Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human, business, and technology resources," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(5), pages 375-405, May.
    25. Haitham Mohsin Kareem & Mohammed Dauwed & Ahmed Meri & Mu’taman Jarrar & Mohammad Al-Bsheish & Ali Abdulameer Aldujaili, 2021. "The Role of Accounting Information System and Knowledge Management to Enhancing Organizational Performance in Iraqi SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-13, November.
    26. Areej Ahmad Alshaafee & Noorminshah A. Iahad & Mohammed A. Al-Sharafi, 2021. "Benefits or Risks: What Influences Novice Drivers Regarding Adopting Smart Cars?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-20, October.
    27. Yu, Wantao & Chavez, Roberto & Jacobs, Mark A. & Feng, Mengying, 2018. "Data-driven supply chain capabilities and performance: A resource-based view," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 371-385.
    28. Stephanie Duchek, 2020. "Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 215-246, April.
    29. Bader Yousef Obeidat & Mai Maher Al-Suradi & Ra’ed Masa’deh & Ali Tarhini, 2016. "The impact of knowledge management on innovation," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 39(10), pages 1214-1238, October.
    30. Youssef M. Abu Amuna & Mazen J. Al Shobaki & Samy S. Abu Naser, 2017. "The Role of Knowledge-Based Computerized Management Information Systems in the Administrative Decision-Making Process," Post-Print hal-01522412, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammed A. Hajar & Ammar Ahmed Alkahtani & Daing Nasir Ibrahim & Mohammed A. Al-Sharafi & Gamal Alkawsi & Noorminshah A. Iahad & Mohd Ridzuan Darun & Sieh Kiong Tiong, 2022. "The Effect of Value Innovation in the Superior Performance and Sustainable Growth of Telecommunications Sector: Mediation Effect of Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrick Mikalef & Ilias O. Pappas & John Krogstie & Michail Giannakos, 2018. "Big data analytics capabilities: a systematic literature review and research agenda," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 547-578, August.
    2. Paul A. Pavlou & Omar A. El Sawy, 2006. "From IT Leveraging Competence to Competitive Advantage in Turbulent Environments: The Case of New Product Development," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 198-227, September.
    3. FeCheng Ma & Farhan Khan & Kashif Ullah Khan & Si XiangYun, 2021. "Investigating the Impact of Information Technology, Absorptive Capacity, and Dynamic Capabilities on Firm Performance: An Empirical Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    4. Rogier van de Wetering & Sherah Kurnia & Svyatoslav Kotusev, 2020. "The Effect of Enterprise Architecture Deployment Practices on Organizational Benefits: A Dynamic Capability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Muhammad Irfan & Mingzheng Wang & Naeem Akhtar, 2019. "Impact of IT capabilities on supply chain capabilities and organizational agility: a dynamic capability view," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 113-128, December.
    6. Claudio Vitari, 2009. "It Dynamic Capability Development In The Context Of Data Genesis Capability," Post-Print hal-00463282, HAL.
    7. Yew Wong, Chee & Karia, Noorliza, 2010. "Explaining the competitive advantage of logistics service providers: A resource-based view approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 51-67, November.
    8. Mikalef, Patrick & Pateli, Adamantia, 2017. "Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-16.
    9. Abhay Nath Mishra & Prabhudev Konana & Anitesh Barua, 2007. "Antecedents and Consequences of Internet Use in Procurement: An Empirical Investigation of U.S. Manufacturing Firms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 103-120, March.
    10. Baoshan Ge & Liyi Zhao, 2022. "The impact of the integration of opportunity and resources of new ventures on entrepreneurial performance: The moderating role of BDAC‐AI," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 440-461, May.
    11. Rogier van de Wetering & Tom Hendrickx & Sjaak Brinkkemper & Sherah Kurnia, 2021. "The Impact of EA-Driven Dynamic Capabilities, Innovativeness, and Structure on Organizational Benefits: A Variance and fsQCA Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-23, May.
    12. Marjorie Lecerf & Nessrine Omrani, 2020. "SME Internationalization: the Impact of Information Technology and Innovation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(2), pages 805-824, June.
    13. Srinivasan, Mahesh & Srivastava, Prashant & Iyer, Karthik N.S., 2020. "Response strategy to environment context factors using a lean and agile approach: Implications for firm performance," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 900-913.
    14. Sooksan Kantabutra & Nuttasorn Ketprapakorn, 2021. "Toward an Organizational Theory of Resilience: An Interim Struggle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-28, November.
    15. Iyer, Karthik N.S. & Srivastava, Prashant & Srinivasan, Mahesh, 2019. "Performance implications of lean in supply chains: Exploring the role of learning orientation and relational resources," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 94-104.
    16. Eriksson, Taina, 2014. "Processes, antecedents and outcomes of dynamic capabilities," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 65-82.
    17. Claudio Vitari & Gabriele Piccoli, & Lapo Mola & Cecilia Rossignoli, 2012. "Antecedents Of It Dynamic Capabilities In The Context Of The Digital Data Genesis," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-00808644, HAL.
    18. Jean, Ruey-Jer “Bryan” & Sinkovics, Rudolf R. & Kim, Daekwan & Lew, Yong Kyu, 2015. "Drivers and performance implications of international key account management capability," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 543-555.
    19. Wang, Yi & Shi, Si & Nevo, Saggi & Li, Shaorui & Chen, Yang, 2015. "The interaction effect of IT assets and IT management on firm performance: A systems perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 580-593.
    20. Nam, Dalwoo & Lee, Junyeong & Lee, Heeseok, 2019. "Business analytics use in CRM: A nomological net from IT competence to CRM performance," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 233-245.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:4967-:d:798371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.