IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p4942-d797864.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ambient and Heat-Cured Geopolymer Composites: Mix Design Optimization and Life Cycle Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Rabie

    (Center for Advanced Materials (CAM), Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar)

  • Mohammad R. Irshidat

    (Center for Advanced Materials (CAM), Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar)

  • Nasser Al-Nuaimi

    (Center for Advanced Materials (CAM), Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar)

Abstract

The feasibility of producing sustainable cement-free composites and its environmental impact were investigated in this research. Experimental parametric evaluation was carried out in this regard to explore the optimum mix design of the composites. The effect of synthesis parameters and curing conditions on the behavior of the produced geopolymer composites was investigated. The studied parameters included the molarity of the sodium hydroxide solution (12 M, 14 M, and 16 M), the sodium silicate to sodium hydroxide ratio (1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5), the fluid to binder ratio (0.6, 0.65, and 0.7), and the age. The curing conditions included ambient curing and heat treatment at 40 °C, 80 °C, and 120 °C for 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h. In addition, life cycle assessment was performed to compare the environmental impact of geopolymer and cementitious composites. The results reflected the possibility of producing geopolymer composites with significant positive environmental impacts over traditional cementitious composites. The synthesis parameters played a major role in the behavior of the produced geopolymers. Heat curing was necessary for the geopolymer mortar to achieve high early strength. However, strength development with age was more obvious for ambient-cured specimens than heat-cured specimens. The optimum fluid to binder ratio used in this research was 0.6. For this ratio, the compressive strength increased as the molarity of the sodium hydroxide solution increased for all sodium silicate to sodium hydroxide ratios. Finally, SEM images showed that the higher the molarity and as the amount of reacted FA particles increased, the better the microstructure of the geopolymer mortar was and the fewer pores the matrix had.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Rabie & Mohammad R. Irshidat & Nasser Al-Nuaimi, 2022. "Ambient and Heat-Cured Geopolymer Composites: Mix Design Optimization and Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:4942-:d:797864
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/4942/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/4942/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Soo Huey Teh & Thomas Wiedmann & Stephen Moore, 2018. "Mixed-unit hybrid life cycle assessment applied to the recycling of construction materials," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 7(1), pages 1-25, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edgar Battand Towa Kouokam & Vanessa Zeller & Wouter Achten, 2019. "Input-output models and waste management analysis: A critical review," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/359535, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. Muhandiramge Nimashi Navodana Rodrigo & Srinath Perera & Sepani Senaratne & Xiaohua Jin, 2021. "Review of Supply Chain Based Embodied Carbon Estimating Method: A Case Study Based Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Dominik Kryzia & Marta Kuta & Dominika Matuszewska & Piotr Olczak, 2020. "Analysis of the Potential for Gas Micro-Cogeneration Development in Poland Using the Monte Carlo Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-24, June.
    4. Maxime Agez & Richard Wood & Manuele Margni & Anders H. Strømman & Réjean Samson & Guillaume Majeau‐Bettez, 2020. "Hybridization of complete PLCA and MRIO databases for a comprehensive product system coverage," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(4), pages 774-790, August.
    5. Shahjadi Hisan Farjana & Tatenda Miriam Mungombe & Hasith Madhumahda Kahanda Gamage & Anmol Sarfraj Rajwani & Olubukola Tokede & Mahmud Ashraf, 2023. "Circulating the E-Waste Recovery from the Construction and Demolition Industries: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
    6. Guanru Wang & Dariusz Krzywda & Sergey Kondrashev & Lubov Vorona-Slivinskaya, 2021. "Recycling and Upcycling in the Practice of Waste Management of Construction Giants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Qinghui Zhou & Haoshi Liu & Yuhang Qiu & Wuchao Zheng, 2022. "Object Detection for Construction Waste Based on an Improved YOLOv5 Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Man Yu & Thomas Wiedmann, 2018. "Implementing hybrid LCA routines in an input–output virtual laboratory," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 7(1), pages 1-24, December.
    9. Héctor Hernández & Felipe Ossio & Michael Silva, 2023. "Assessment of Sustainability and Efficiency Metrics in Modern Methods of Construction: A Case Study Using a Life Cycle Assessment Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:4942-:d:797864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.