IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i16p9171-d615218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review of Supply Chain Based Embodied Carbon Estimating Method: A Case Study Based Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Muhandiramge Nimashi Navodana Rodrigo

    (Centre for Smart Modern Construction, School of Engineering, Design and Built Environment, Western Sydney University, Kingswood, NSW 2747, Australia)

  • Srinath Perera

    (Centre for Smart Modern Construction, School of Engineering, Design and Built Environment, Western Sydney University, Kingswood, NSW 2747, Australia)

  • Sepani Senaratne

    (Centre for Smart Modern Construction, School of Engineering, Design and Built Environment, Western Sydney University, Kingswood, NSW 2747, Australia)

  • Xiaohua Jin

    (Centre for Smart Modern Construction, School of Engineering, Design and Built Environment, Western Sydney University, Kingswood, NSW 2747, Australia)

Abstract

Carbon estimating plays a vital role in the construction industry. The current focus on introducing zero-carbon construction projects reduces operational carbon, at the expense of Embodied Carbon (EC). However, it is important to reduce overall net carbon emissions. There are various methods to estimate carbon, but the accuracy of these estimates is questionable. This paper reviews a novel methodology, the Supply Chain based Embodied carbon Estimating Method (SCEEM), which was introduced recently to accurately estimate EC in construction supply chains. SCEEM is compared against existing EC estimating methods (Blackbook and eToolLCD) using a case study approach. It is also supplemented with a comprehensive literature review of existing EC methods. The EC values calculated using Blackbook and eToolLCD were mostly higher than SCEEM. Since SCEEM uses actual site data and considers first principles-based value addition method to estimate EC, it is considered accurate. The cross-case analysis revealed that SCEEM provided consistent results. Hence, SCEEM is recommended to accurately estimate EC of any type of project.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhandiramge Nimashi Navodana Rodrigo & Srinath Perera & Sepani Senaratne & Xiaohua Jin, 2021. "Review of Supply Chain Based Embodied Carbon Estimating Method: A Case Study Based Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9171-:d:615218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9171/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9171/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feifei Fu & Hanbin Luo & Hua Zhong & Andrew Hill, 2014. "Development of a Carbon Emission Calculations System for Optimizing Building Plan Based on the LCA Framework," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-13, June.
    2. Soo Huey Teh & Thomas Wiedmann & Stephen Moore, 2018. "Mixed-unit hybrid life cycle assessment applied to the recycling of construction materials," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 7(1), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Peiqi Xu & Ling Shao & Zihao Geng & Manli Guo & Zijun Wei & Zi Wu, 2019. "Consumption-Based Carbon Emissions of Tianjin Based on Multi-Scale Input–Output Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-12, November.
    4. Craig Langston, 2013. "The role of coordinate-based decision-making in the evaluation of sustainable built environments," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 62-77, January.
    5. Dongyoun Lee & Goune Kang & Chulu Nam & Hunhee Cho & Kyung-In Kang, 2019. "Stochastic Analysis of Embodied Carbon Dioxide Emissions Considering Variability of Construction Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-12, August.
    6. Wu Xie & Shuai Hu & Fangyi Li & Xin Cao & Zhipeng Tang, 2020. "Carbon and Water Footprints of Tibet: Spatial Pattern and Trend Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Ming Hu, 2020. "A Building Life-Cycle Embodied Performance Index—The Relationship between Embodied Energy, Embodied Carbon and Environmental Impact," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    8. Amalka Nawarathna & Muditha Siriwardana & Zaid Alwan, 2021. "Embodied Carbon as a Material Selection Criterion: Insights from Sri Lankan Construction Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    9. Wang, Yuan & Wang, Wenqin & Mao, Guozhu & Cai, Hua & Zuo, Jian & Wang, Lili & Zhao, Peng, 2013. "Industrial CO2 emissions in China based on the hypothetical extraction method: Linkage analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1238-1244.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicole Anderson & Gayan Wedawatta & Ishara Rathnayake & Niluka Domingo & Zahirah Azizi, 2022. "Embodied Energy Consumption in the Residential Sector: A Case Study of Affordable Housing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Haoran Wang & Toshiyuki Fujita, 2023. "A Review of Research on Embodied Carbon in International Trade," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aylin Ece Kayabekir & Zülal Akbay Arama & Gebrail Bekdaş & Sinan Melih Nigdeli & Zong Woo Geem, 2020. "Eco-Friendly Design of Reinforced Concrete Retaining Walls: Multi-objective Optimization with Harmony Search Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-30, July.
    2. Gervásio Ferreira dos Santos & Luiz Carlos de Santana Ribeiro & Rodrigo Barbosa de Cerqueira, 2020. "The informal sector and Covid‐19 economic impacts: The case of Bahia, Brazil," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(6), pages 1273-1285, December.
    3. Adedayo Johnson Ogungbile & Geoffrey Qiping Shen & Ibrahim Yahaya Wuni & Jin Xue & Jingke Hong, 2021. "A Hybrid Framework for Direct CO 2 Emissions Quantification in China’s Construction Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Zhou, Dequn & Zhou, Xiaoyong & Xu, Qing & Wu, Fei & Wang, Qunwei & Zha, Donglan, 2018. "Regional embodied carbon emissions and their transfer characteristics in China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 180-193.
    5. Linda Giresini & Claudia Casapulla & Pietro Croce, 2021. "Environmental and Economic Impact of Retrofitting Techniques to Prevent Out-of-Plane Failure Modes of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-26, October.
    6. Edgar Battand Towa Kouokam & Vanessa Zeller & Wouter Achten, 2019. "Input-output models and waste management analysis: A critical review," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/359535, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    7. Lien-Chieh Lee & Yuan Wang & Yuanyuan Yan & Jian Zuo, 2018. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions Embodied in the Chinese International Trade of Computer Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Wang, Linyuan & Zhao, Lin & Mao, Guozhu & Zuo, Jian & Du, Huibin, 2017. "Way to accomplish low carbon development transformation: A bibliometric analysis during 1995–2014," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 57-69.
    9. Elżbieta Szaruga & Elżbieta Załoga, 2022. "Environmental Management from the Point of View of the Energy Intensity of Road Freight Transport and Shocks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-22, November.
    10. Belen Moreno Santamaria & Fernando del Ama Gonzalo & Matthew Griffin & Benito Lauret Aguirregabiria & Juan A. Hernandez Ramos, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of Dynamic Water Flow Glazing Envelopes: A Case Study with Real Test Facilities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    11. Luca Ciacci & Fabrizio Passarini, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Environmental and Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-8, November.
    12. Zhaocheng Li & Yu Song, 2022. "Energy Consumption Linkages of the Chinese Construction Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-13, February.
    13. Hua Liao & Celio Andrade & Julio Lumbreras & Jing Tian, 2018. "CO2 Emissions in Beijing: Sectoral Linkages and Demand Drivers," CEEP-BIT Working Papers 113, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEP), Beijing Institute of Technology.
    14. Xinsheng Zhou & Qinyang Guo & Yuanyuan Wang & Guofeng Wang, 2022. "Trade and Embodied CO 2 Emissions: Analysis from a Global Input–Output Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Chen, Zhenni & Liu, Xi & Li, Jianglong, 2022. "Identifying channels of environmental impacts of transport sector through sectoral linkage analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    16. Marinella Giunta & Dario Lo Bosco & Giovanni Leonardi & Francesco Scopelliti, 2019. "Estimation of Gas and Dust Emissions in Construction Sites of a Motorway Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Meihui Jiang, 2022. "Locating the Principal Sectors for Carbon Emission Reduction on the Global Supply Chains by the Methods of Complex Network and Susceptible–Infective Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-13, February.
    18. Du, Huibin & Chen, Zhenni & Peng, Binbin & Southworth, Frank & Ma, Shoufeng & Wang, Yuan, 2019. "What drives CO2 emissions from the transport sector? A linkage analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 195-204.
    19. Xin Yan & Jianping Ge, 2017. "The Economy-Carbon Nexus in China: A Multi-Regional Input-Output Analysis of the Influence of Sectoral and Regional Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-28, January.
    20. Yue Liu & Ying Qu & Zhen Lei & Wenhua Wang, 2020. "Multi-sector reduction potential of embodied carbon emissions in China: a case study of Liaoning province," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 5585-5602, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9171-:d:615218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.