IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i8p4439-d789611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating Carbon Budget from Growth and Management of Urban Street Trees in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Jin-Young Kim

    (Department of Ecological Landscape Architecture Design, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea)

  • Hyun-Kil Jo

    (Department of Ecological Landscape Architecture Design, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea)

Abstract

Although street trees take up carbon by vegetation growth, they emit carbon directly or indirectly into the atmosphere due to the need for regular management, such as pruning and, irrigation, etc. This study estimates the annual carbon budget from the growth and management of urban street trees in South Korea and suggests management strategies to minimize the degree of management and annual carbon emissions. Annual carbon emissions from management practices such as pruning, irrigation, pesticide and fungicide application, and fertilization were estimated based on maintenance data, interviews with managers, and actual measurements. Annual carbon emissions from the management of urban street trees were calculated to be 2.4 kg/tree/year. From this total, pruning was the largest contributor at 91%. The average net carbon uptake for each street tree was 5.5 kg/tree/year. The street trees included in this study played an important role in carbon uptake, which was equivalent to 90–550% of the annual carbon emissions from street tree management. Based on these results, suggested management strategies include pruning, irrigation, pesticide and fungicide application, and fertilization. These study results will be useful for designing practical low-carbon landscapes with minimal management and carbon emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin-Young Kim & Hyun-Kil Jo, 2022. "Estimating Carbon Budget from Growth and Management of Urban Street Trees in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4439-:d:789611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4439/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4439/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hyun-Kil Jo & Jin-Young Kim & Hye-Mi Park, 2020. "Carbon and PM 2.5 Reduction and Design Guidelines for Street Trees in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Yao, Yongling & Pan, Haozhi & Cui, Xiaoyu & Wang, Zhen, 2022. "Do compact cities have higher efficiencies of agglomeration economies? A dynamic panel model with compactness indicators," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tianhui Fan & Andrew Chapman, 2022. "Policy Driven Compact Cities: Toward Clarifying the Effect of Compact Cities on Carbon Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenxiao WANG & Shandre THANGAVELU, 2024. "Urban Agglomeration, Firm Performance, and Global Value Chain in China," Working Papers DP-2024-14, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    2. Lu Liu & Yu Tian & Haiquan Chen, 2023. "The Costs of Agglomeration: Misallocation of Credit in Chinese Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Chen, Yuangong & Chen, Wenli & Gong, Jianzhou & Yuan, Haiwei, 2023. "Uncommonly known change characteristics of land use pattern in Guangdong Province–Hong Kong–Macao, China: Space time pattern, terrain gradient effects and policy implication," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    4. Junyue Yang & Xiaomei Li & Jia Du & Canhui Cheng, 2023. "Exploring the Relationship between Urban Street Spatial Patterns and Street Vitality: A Case Study of Guiyang, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Xiao Ling & Yue Gao & Guoyong Wu, 2023. "How Does Intensive Land Use Affect Low-Carbon Transition in China? New Evidence from the Spatial Econometric Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-26, August.
    6. Wang, Jie & Zhang, Yuzhen & Zhang, Xiaoling & Song, Mengqiao & Ye, Jianping, 2023. "The spatio-temporal trends of urban green space and its interactions with urban growth: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta region, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    7. Tianhui Fan & Andrew Chapman, 2022. "Policy Driven Compact Cities: Toward Clarifying the Effect of Compact Cities on Carbon Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Zheng, Qikang & Sharmeen, Fariya & Xu, Chengcheng & Liu, Pan, 2024. "Assessing regional road traffic safety in Sweden through dynamic panel data analysis: Influence of the planned innovative policies and the unplanned COVID-19 pandemic," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    9. Shuke Fu & Jiabei Liu & Jiali Tian & Jiachao Peng & Chuyue Wu, 2023. "Impact of Digital Economy on Energy Supply Chain Efficiency: Evidence from Chinese Energy Enterprises," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, January.
    10. Lei Jiang & Yuan Chen & Hui Zha & Bo Zhang & Yuanzheng Cui, 2022. "Quantifying the Impact of Urban Sprawl on Green Total Factor Productivity in China: Based on Satellite Observation Data and Spatial Econometric Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, November.
    11. Xue, Wenhao & Wang, LiYun & Yang, Zhe & Xiong, Zhenwu & Li, Xinyao & Xu, Qingqing & Cai, Zhaoxin, 2023. "Can clean heating effectively alleviate air pollution: An empirical study based on the plan for cleaner winter heating in northern China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    12. Chengye Jia & Shuang Feng & Hong Chu & Weige Huang, 2023. "The Heterogeneous Effects of Urban Form on CO 2 Emissions: An Empirical Analysis of 255 Cities in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4439-:d:789611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.