IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i7p4291-d786995.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing Tourism and Environment—Trail Erosion, Thresholds of Potential Concern and Limits of Acceptable Change

Author

Listed:
  • Deirdre Dragovich

    (School of Geosciences, University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia)

  • Sunil Bajpai

    (School of Geosciences, University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia)

Abstract

Natural area tourism may contribute to deterioration in biophysical environments important for sustainable conservation of biodiversity and/or historically significant sites. Levels of protection within the IUCN guidelines provide general descriptors of desirable outcomes, and the Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC) management tool has often been implicitly applied. This article presents an initial attempt to assess the value of Thresholds of Potential Concern (TPC) relative to LAC as management frameworks for protected areas, using the example of trail width as an indicator of visitor impacts on vegetation, soil, water and, potentially, visitor safety. Visitor preferences relating to trail width were incorporated when applying the TPC and LAC principles. Sections of three walking trails in a high-visitation national park near Sydney, Australia, were measured at ~10.7 m intervals: the mean trail widths were 1.6 m, 1.8 m and 2.14 m. Of the 115 recreationists surveyed, 16% of those having the greatest tolerance towards management interventions (‘Non-purist’ wilderness category) viewed a trail ≥ 2 m wide as acceptable, but 96% of ‘Purists’ nominated a maximum of ≤1.5 m. The TPC was found to provide a broad strategy for identification, assessment and grading of multiple biophysical thresholds within an ecological framework. Combined with stakeholder information, the TPC allows for timely, proactive and calibrated management responses to maintaining biophysical and social sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Deirdre Dragovich & Sunil Bajpai, 2022. "Managing Tourism and Environment—Trail Erosion, Thresholds of Potential Concern and Limits of Acceptable Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4291-:d:786995
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4291/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4291/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weaver, David B. & Lawton, Laura J., 2017. "A new visitation paradigm for protected areas," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 140-146.
    2. Richard Butler, 2018. "Sustainable Tourism in Sensitive Environments: A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-11, May.
    3. Vistad, Odd Inge & Vorkinn, Marit, 2012. "The Wilderness Purism Construct — Experiences from Norway with a simplified version of the purism scale," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 39-47.
    4. Ralf Buckley & Paula Brough & Leah Hague & Alienor Chauvenet & Chris Fleming & Elisha Roche & Ernesta Sofija & Neil Harris, 2019. "Author Correction: Economic value of protected areas via visitor mental health," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-1, December.
    5. Miju Kim & Sangkwon Lee & Chi-Ok Oh, 2021. "Assessing Tradeoffs between Development and Conservation: A Case of Land Use Change in a National Park of Korea," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Ralf Buckley & Paula Brough & Leah Hague & Alienor Chauvenet & Chris Fleming & Elisha Roche & Ernesta Sofija & Neil Harris, 2019. "Economic value of protected areas via visitor mental health," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kamila Štekerová & Josef Zelenka & Milan Kořínek, 2022. "Agent-Based Modelling in Visitor Management of Protected Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Daminda Sumanapala & Isabelle D. Wolf, 2022. "Introducing Geotourism to Diversify the Visitor Experience in Protected Areas and Reduce Impacts on Overused Attractions," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Destina Samani & Keith Bosak & Sarah J. Halvorson, 2023. "Community-Centered Sustainable Ecotourism Planning in the Bossou Forest Reserve, Guinea, West Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Åsa Davidsson & Magnus Johansson & Carl Bonander, 2021. "Desirable Effects from Disturbance Ecology—A Paradox within Conservation Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Ralf C. Buckley, 2022. "Sensory and Emotional Components in Tourist Memories of Wildlife Encounters: Intense, Detailed, and Long-Lasting Recollections of Individual Incidents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-12, April.
    3. Zoe M Volenec & Joel O Abraham & Alexander D Becker & Andy P Dobson, 2021. "Public parks and the pandemic: How park usage has been affected by COVID-19 policies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Li, Chuanyao & Wang, Junren, 2024. "Using an age-grouped Gaussian-based two-step floating catchment area method (AG2SFCA) to measure walking accessibility to urban parks: With an explicit focus on elderly," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    5. Astell-Burt, Thomas & Navakatikyan, Michael & Eckermann, Simon & Hackett, Maree & Feng, Xiaoqi, 2022. "Is urban green space associated with lower mental healthcare expenditure?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    6. Wu, Na & Tian, Qingsong & Cui, Mengying & He, Mingwei, 2023. "A delicacy evaluation method for park walkability considering multidimensional quality heterogeneity," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    7. Pei Lin & Lili Chen & Zeshun Luo, 2022. "Analysis of Tourism Experience in Haizhu National Wetland Park Based on Web Text," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Ming-Kuang Chung & Dau-Jye Lu & Bor-Wen Tsai & Kuei-Tien Chou, 2019. "Assessing Effectiveness of PPGIS on Protected Areas by Governance Quality: A Case Study of Community-Based Monitoring in Wu-Wei-Kang Wildlife Refuge, Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Stefano Duglio & Alessandro Bonadonna & Marilisa Letey & Giovanni Peira & Laura Zavattaro & Giampiero Lombardi, 2019. "Tourism Development in Inner Mountain Areas—The Local Stakeholders’ Point of View through a Mixed Method Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Adam Burke, 2021. "The Crossroads of Ecotourism Dependency, Food Security and a Global Pandemic in Galápagos, Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Arjan S. Gosal & Janine A. McMahon & Katharine M. Bowgen & Catherine H. Hoppe & Guy Ziv, 2021. "Identifying and Mapping Groups of Protected Area Visitors by Environmental Awareness," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, May.
    12. Guiling Wang & Lei Ye, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Pattern of Mismatch Degree of High-Quality Tourism Development and Its Formation Mechanism in Taihu Lake Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    13. Thomas Dax & Oliver Tamme, 2023. "Attractive Landscape Features as Drivers for Sustainable Mountain Tourism Experiences," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-16, June.
    14. Farzana Sharmin & Mohammad Tipu Sultan & Alina Badulescu & Dorin Paul Bac & Benqian Li, 2020. "Millennial Tourists’ Environmentally Sustainable Behavior Towards a Natural Protected Area: An Integrative Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-24, October.
    15. Petra HLAVÁČKOVÁ & Hana SLOVÁČKOVÁ & David BŘEZINA & Jakub MICHAL, 2018. "Comparison of results of visitor arrival monitoring using regression analysis," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(7), pages 303-312.
    16. Ahmad Salman & Mastura Jaafar & Diana Mohamad & Mana Khoshkam, 2023. "Understanding Multi-stakeholder Complexity & Developing a Causal Recipe (fsQCA) for achieving Sustainable Ecotourism," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 10261-10284, September.
    17. David Zejda & Josef Zelenka, 2019. "The Concept of Comprehensive Tracking Software to Support Sustainable Tourism in Protected Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-18, July.
    18. Agnieszka Niezgoda & Marek Nowacki, 2020. "Experiencing Nature: Physical Activity, Beauty and Tension in Tatra National Park—Analysis of TripAdvisor Reviews," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
    19. Esteban Pérez-Calderón & Jorge Manuel Prieto-Ballester & Vanessa Miguel-Barrado & Patricia Milanés-Montero, 2020. "Perception of Sustainability of Spanish National Parks: Public Use, Tourism and Rural Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, February.
    20. Pilar Espeso-Molinero & María José Pastor-Alfonso, 2020. "Governance, Community Resilience, and Indigenous Tourism in Nahá, Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4291-:d:786995. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.