IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i7p4250-d786306.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis of the Effect of Non-Parking Facilities in Parking-Only Buildings on the Traffic Inducement Rate

Author

Listed:
  • Jae-Young Jeong

    (Department of Urban and Regional Development, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Korea)

  • Mi-Jeong Cho

    (Department of Urban and Regional Development, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Korea)

  • Myeong-Hun Lee

    (Department of Urban and Regional Development, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Korea)

Abstract

The designation parking-only building (POB)was first introduced in the Parking Lot Act on 14 December 1991. According to the law, POBs can be used for purposes other than parking facilities, that is, non-parking facilities (NPFs), up to 70% of the total floor area. In addition, the POB is an infrastructure in accordance with the National Land Planning and Utilization Act. Excessive introduction of NPFs in a POB weakens the public nature of the building and creates additional demand for parking due to NPFs, thus changing the original meaning of a parking lot. However, on the other hand, NPFs in POBs have a positive aspect in that they contribute to the realization of a compressed city through mixed-use development and increased user convenience. This study investigated and analyzed the usage status of NPFs for POBs in 31 cities in Gyeonggi-do, Korea. In addition, the amount of traffic generated by NPFs was defined as the traffic inducement rate (TIR) and policy implications were presented by analyzing the influencing factors. The ratio of NPFs in POBs was 20% on average, but 3% in public parking lots, and 24% in private parking lots. Most of the NPFs used were for-profit facilities such as neighborhood living facilities and sales facilities. As a result of analyzing the factors affecting the TIR, it was analyzed that the larger the total floor area of a POB, the higher the private ownership, the smaller the number of parking spaces; and the larger the entrance road width, the greater the TIR. In order to prevent excessive change in the use of POBs, the ratio limit of NPFs will be gradually lowered in proportion to the total floor area and public parking lots will be expanded. In the planning stage, meticulous district-wide planning is required for the use and ratio of NPFs in POBs according to the access road type. This article will be meaningful if you want to supply a POB that satisfies suppliers, consumers, and users. In particular, it will enable government officials who decide and implement policies related to POBs to recognize that full-scale research is necessary.

Suggested Citation

  • Jae-Young Jeong & Mi-Jeong Cho & Myeong-Hun Lee, 2022. "An Analysis of the Effect of Non-Parking Facilities in Parking-Only Buildings on the Traffic Inducement Rate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4250-:d:786306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4250/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4250/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muhammad Nadeem & Amer Aziz & Muhammad Ahmad Al-Rashid & Giovanni Tesoriere & Muhammad Asim & Tiziana Campisi, 2021. "Scaling the Potential of Compact City Development: The Case of Lahore, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Akkelies van Nes, 2021. "Spatial Configurations and Walkability Potentials. Measuring Urban Compactness with Space Syntax," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Yu Song & Guofan Shao & Xiaodong Song & Yong Liu & Lei Pan & Hong Ye, 2017. "The Relationships between Urban Form and Urban Commuting: An Empirical Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-17, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yedong Chen & Jiang Chang & Zixuan Li & Li Ming & Cankun Li & Cheng Li, 2023. "Coupling Coordination and Spatiotemporal Analysis of Urban Compactness and Land-Use Efficiency in Resource-Based Areas: A Case Study of Shanxi Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Muhammad Mashhood Arif & Muhammad Ahsan & Oswald Devisch & Yves Schoonjans, 2022. "Integrated Approach to Explore Multidimensional Urban Morphology of Informal Settlements: The Case Studies of Lahore, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-28, June.
    3. Mei Zhang & Jia Tang & Jun Gao, 2023. "Examining the Effects of Built Environments and Individual Characteristics on Commuting Time under Spatial Heterogeneity: An Empirical Study in China Using HLM," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Junyue Yang & Xiaomei Li & Jia Du & Canhui Cheng, 2023. "Exploring the Relationship between Urban Street Spatial Patterns and Street Vitality: A Case Study of Guiyang, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Long Zhou & Guoqiang Shen & Yao Wu & Robert Brown & Tian Chen & Chenyu Wang, 2018. "Urban Form, Growth, and Accessibility in Space and Time: Anatomy of Land Use at the Parcel-Level in a Small to Medium-Sized American City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Walid-Mahfoud Djenaihi & Noureddine Zemmouri & Moussadek Djenane & Akkelies van Nes, 2021. "Noise and Spatial Configuration in Biskra, Algeria—A Space Syntax Approach to Understand the Built Environment for Visually Impaired People," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-24, October.
    7. Jerry Zhirong Zhao & Shengnan Lou & Camila Fonseca & Richard Feiock & Ruowen Shen, 2021. "Explaining transit expenses in US urbanised areas: Urban scale, spatial form and fiscal capacity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(2), pages 280-296, February.
    8. Poklewski-Koziełł, Damian & Dudzic-Gyurkovich, Karolina & Duarte, Carlos Marmolejo, 2023. "Investigating urban form, and walkability measures in the new developments. The case study of Garnizon in Gdansk," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    9. Ran Guo & Hong Leng & Qing Yuan & Shiyi Song, 2022. "Impact of Urban Form on CO 2 Emissions under Different Socioeconomic Factors: Evidence from 132 Small and Medium-Sized Cities in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, May.
    10. Dalit Shach-Pinsly & Hadas Shadar, 2023. "Towards Rural Regeneration in a Post-Agricultural and Post-Ideological Era," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, April.
    11. Guiwen Liu & Cheng Li & Taozhi Zhuang & Yuhan Zheng & Hongjuan Wu & Jian Tang, 2022. "Determining the Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Urban Regeneration Projects in China on the City Scale: The Case of Shenzhen," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, July.
    12. Heli Lu & Menglin Xia & Ziyuan Qin & Siqi Lu & Ruimin Guan & Yuna Yang & Changhong Miao & Taizheng Chen, 2022. "The Built Environment Assessment of Residential Areas in Wuhan during the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-20, June.
    13. Varvara Nikulina & David Simon & Henrik Ny & Henrikke Baumann, 2019. "Context-Adapted Urban Planning for Rapid Transitioning of Personal Mobility towards Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-37, February.
    14. Woo Jang & Fei Yuan & Jose Javier Lopez, 2021. "Investigating Sustainable Commuting Patterns by Socio-Economic Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    15. Kestutis Zaleckis & Szymon Chmielewski & Jūratė Kamičaitytė & Indre Grazuleviciute-Vileniske & Halina Lipińska, 2022. "Walkability Compass—A Space Syntax Solution for Comparative Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
    16. Muhammad Nadeem & Nayab Khaliq & Naseem Akhtar & Muhammad Ahmad Al-Rashid & Muhammad Asim & Merve Kayaci Codur & Enea Mustafaraj & Muhammed Yasin Codur & Farrukh Baig, 2022. "Exploring the Urban Form and Compactness: A Case Study of Multan, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, December.
    17. Xiping Yang & Zhixiang Fang & Ling Yin & Junyi Li & Yang Zhou & Shiwei Lu, 2018. "Understanding the Spatial Structure of Urban Commuting Using Mobile Phone Location Data: A Case Study of Shenzhen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, May.
    18. Xiaoling Dai & Jiafeng Jin & Qianhu Chen & Xin Fang, 2022. "On Physical Urban Boundaries, Urban Sprawl, and Compactness Measurement: A Case Study of the Wen-Tai Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, September.
    19. Xiaoyan Li & Yanchuan Mou & Huiying Wang & Chaohui Yin & Qingsong He, 2018. "How Does Polycentric Urban Form Affect Urban Commuting? Quantitative Measurement Using Geographical Big Data of 100 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.
    20. Haidong Yu & Yong Liu & Juanjuan Zhao & Gen Li, 2019. "Urban Total Factor Productivity: Does Urban Spatial Structure Matter in China?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4250-:d:786306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.