IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i6p3678-d776320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review of Medical Waste Management Systems in the Republic of Korea for Hospital and Medical Waste Generated from the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Cheol-Woo Yoon

    (Department of Environmental Resources Research, National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon 22689, Korea
    Department of Environmental Engineering, In-Ha University, Incheon 22212, Korea)

  • Min-Jung Kim

    (Department of Environmental Resources Research, National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon 22689, Korea)

  • Yoon-Su Park

    (Department of Environmental Resources Research, National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon 22689, Korea)

  • Tae-Wan Jeon

    (Department of Environmental Resources Research, National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon 22689, Korea)

  • Min-Yong Lee

    (Department of Environmental Resources Research, National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon 22689, Korea)

Abstract

With the increasing generation of medical waste worldwide, managing medical waste has become crucial, given its potential environmental and public health risks. Previously in the Republic of Korea, medical waste was often mixed with municipal waste and disposed of in residential landfills or unsuitable treatment facilities (e.g., improperly managed incinerators). Environmental regulators and waste producers have made extensive efforts in recent years to improve waste management at healthcare facilities. This study presents an overview of the status of medical waste management in Korea and discusses information on the generation, composition, separation, transportation, and treatment of medical waste. Incineration was confirmed to be the most preferred treatment method for medical waste and was the only one used until late 2005. Large-scale medical waste incinerators are used for treating medical waste from most medical facilities in Korea; however, with increasing regulations on toxic air emissions (e.g., dioxins and furans), air emission standards are being tightened for all existing small-scale incineration facilities without air pollution control. Since medical waste usually contains various plastic materials such as polyvinyl chloride, these incinerators are highly likely to emit toxic air pollutants if improperly operated and managed. Waste minimization and recycling, control of toxic air emissions from medical waste incinerators, and alternative treatment methods to incineration are seen as major challenges. Incineration capacity cannot be expanded as quickly as the rising quantities of medical waste in Korea; thus, there is a growing need to reconsider the overall management system. Accordingly, we examined various medical waste treatment policies and methods that are being implemented in other countries, in addition to the main strategy of waste management. To determine preferable directions for the improvement of the medical waste management system, we investigated and compared the status of domestic and foreign waste management and proposed directions for improvement, focusing on several issues related to the current medical waste management system in Korea.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheol-Woo Yoon & Min-Jung Kim & Yoon-Su Park & Tae-Wan Jeon & Min-Yong Lee, 2022. "A Review of Medical Waste Management Systems in the Republic of Korea for Hospital and Medical Waste Generated from the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3678-:d:776320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3678/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3678/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manga, Veronica E. & Forton, Osric Tening & Mofor, Linus A. & Woodard, Ryan, 2011. "Health care waste management in Cameroon: A case study from the Southwestern Region," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 108-116.
    2. Simona Bungau & Delia Mirela Tit & Katalin Fodor & Gabriela Cioca & Maricel Agop & Ciprian Iovan & Delia Carmen Nistor Cseppento & Adrian Bumbu & Cristiana Bustea, 2018. "Aspects Regarding the Pharmaceutical Waste Management in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Çelik, Sefa & Peker, İskender & Gök-Kısa, A. Cansu & Büyüközkan, Gülçin, 2023. "Multi-criteria evaluation of medical waste management process under intuitionistic fuzzy environment: A case study on hospitals in Turkey," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    2. Nurul Hamizah Mohamed & Samir Khan & Sandeep Jagtap, 2023. "Modernizing Medical Waste Management: Unleashing the Power of the Internet of Things (IoT)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Aianna Rios Magalhães Véras e Silva & Bruna de Freitas Iwata & Maria do Socorro Ferreira dos Santos & José Machado Moita Neto, 2023. "Impacts and Regulations of Healthcare Solid Waste Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María Carmen Carnero, 2020. "Waste Segregation FMEA Model Integrating Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set and the PAPRIKA Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-29, August.
    2. Catia Milena Lopes & Annibal José Scavarda & Mauricio Nunes Macedo de Carvalho & André Luis Korzenowski, 2018. "The Business Model and Innovation Analyses: The Sustainable Transition Obstacles and Drivers for the Hospital Supply Chains," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Justyna Rogowska & Agnieszka Zimmermann, 2022. "Household Pharmaceutical Waste Disposal as a Global Problem—A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-29, November.
    4. Feroz Khan & Yousaf Ali, 2022. "Implementation of the circular supply chain management in the pharmaceutical industry," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(12), pages 13705-13731, December.
    5. Lyudmyla Symochko & Olena Demyanyuk & Vitaliy Symochko & Daniela Grulova & Jozef Fejer & Ruslan Mariychuk, 2023. "The Spreading of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria in Terrestrial Ecosystems and the Formation of Soil Resistome," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Madalina-Ioana BADILA & Ghita BARSAN & Danut-Eugeniu MOSTEANU & Benoni SFARLOG & Ruxandra MOSTEANU, 2018. "The Place Of Wics Model In The Governance Of An Automotive Systems Corporation," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(1), pages 733-740, November.
    7. Lei Zhao & Cong Lyu & Yu Li, 2021. "Analysis of Factors Influencing Plant–Microbe Combined Remediation of Soil Contaminated by Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.
    8. Daniel Badulescu & Ramona Simut & Alina Badulescu & Andrei-Vlad Badulescu, 2019. "The Relative Effects of Economic Growth, Environmental Pollution and Non-Communicable Diseases on Health Expenditures in European Union Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Liliana Indrie & Julieta Ilieva & Zlatin Zlatev & Simona Tripa & Amalia Sturza, 2023. "Development of an Algorithm for Textile Waste Arrangement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-14, July.
    10. Navarro Ferronato & Vincenzo Torretta, 2019. "Waste Mismanagement in Developing Countries: A Review of Global Issues," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-28, March.
    11. Florin-Constantin Mihai, 2020. "Assessment of COVID-19 Waste Flows During the Emergency State in Romania and Related Public Health and Environmental Concerns," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Thobile Zikhathile & Harrison Atagana, 2018. "Challenges Facing Home-Based Caregivers in the Management of Health Care Risk Waste," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, November.
    13. Simone Aquino & Glauco Antonio Spina & Maria Antonietta Leitão Zajac & Evandro Luiz Lopes, 2018. "Reverse Logistics of Postconsumer Medicines: The Roles and Knowledge of Pharmacists in the Municipality of São Paulo, Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Dorel Dulău & Lisa Craiut & Delia Mirela Tit & Camelia Buhas & Alexandra Georgiana Tarce & Diana Uivarosan, 2022. "Effects of Hospital Decentralization Processes on Patients’ Satisfaction: Evidence from Two Public Romanian Hospitals across Two Decades," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    15. Małgorzata Bogusz & Renata Matysik-Pejas & Andrzej Krasnodębski & Paweł Dziekański, 2021. "The Concept of Zero Waste in the Context of Supporting Environmental Protection by Consumers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    16. Chunyong Wang & Bo Zhu & Yitong Guo & Shasha Tian & Zhenbin Zhang & Xintong Hou, 2022. "Assessment of the Pollution of Soil Heavy Metal(loid)s and Its Relation with Soil Microorganisms in Wetland Soils," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, September.
    17. Bilal Ahmed Khan & Aves Ahmed Khan & Haris Ahmed & Shazia Shaheen Shaikh & Zhaiming Peng & Longsheng Cheng, 2019. "A Study on Small Clinics Waste Management Practice, Rules, Staff Knowledge, and Motivating Factor in a Rapidly Urbanizing Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-15, October.
    18. Yumei Luo & Kai Reimers & Lei Yang & Jinping Lin, 2021. "Household Drug Management Practices of Residents in a Second-Tier City in China: Opportunities for Reducing Drug Waste and Environmental Pollution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-15, August.
    19. Kaouther Maaroufi & Terry Tudor & Mentore Vaccari & Afef Siala & Ezzeddine Mahmoudi, 2020. "An Evaluation of Staff Engagement with Infectious Healthcare Waste Management Policies: A Case Study of Tunisia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-12, March.
    20. Alin Dragos Demetrian & Mihnea Cosmin Costoiu & Augustin Semenescu & Gigel Paraschiv & Oana Roxana Chivu & Claudiu Babis & Georgiana Moiceanu & Olivia Negoita & Ileana Mates, 2019. "On the Reduction of the Biological Danger of Environmental Contamination by Using a “Complete and Reusable Thoracic Drainage System”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3678-:d:776320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.