IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i6p3562-d773679.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bi-Level Programming Model for China’s Marine Domestic Emission Control Area Design

Author

Listed:
  • Xuecheng Tian

    (Department of Logistics and Maritime Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong)

  • Ran Yan

    (Department of Logistics and Maritime Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong)

  • Jingwen Qi

    (Department of Logistics and Maritime Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong)

  • Dan Zhuge

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Hans Wang

    (Faculty of Business, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
    Shenzhen Research Institute, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Shenzhen 518057, China)

Abstract

Due to the adverse impact of seaborne sulfur emissions on coastal areas, the Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China is planning to implement a 0.1% sulfur cap on bunker fuel in the domestic emission control area (DECA) on 1 January 2025. As the current DECA width is only 12 NM, ships can bypass the DECA to reduce the use of high-priced ultra-low sulfur fuel oil (ULSFO) and thus save on fuel costs. The purpose of this study is first to assess the effect of China’s 12-NM-wide DECA policy and then to assist the government in determining the optimal DECA width. We develop a bi-level programming model to capture the relationship between the government policy and ship operators’ operations. In the lower-level programming model, we capture ship operators’ decisions regarding their ships’ sailing routes and speeds while considering the time required for fuel switching, which aims to minimize the total fuel costs over a given voyage. The optimal solution to the lower-level programming model is then embedded in the upper-level programming model to determine the optimal DECA width for the government, with the aim of minimizing the impact of seaborne sulfur emissions on the coastal area environment. The final results, obtained from computational experiments, validate the idea that ships tend to bypass the 12-NM-wide DECA and reduce their sailing speeds inside the DECA to decrease their use of ULSFO. Therefore, we recommend that the government increase the current DECA width to at least 112 NM to prevent ships from bypassing it and to achieve the desired sulfur reduction target.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuecheng Tian & Ran Yan & Jingwen Qi & Dan Zhuge & Hans Wang, 2022. "A Bi-Level Programming Model for China’s Marine Domestic Emission Control Area Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3562-:d:773679
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3562/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3562/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhuge, Dan & Wang, Shuaian & Wang, David Z.W., 2021. "A joint liner ship path, speed and deployment problem under emission reduction measures," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 155-173.
    2. Shuaian Wang & Dan Zhuge & Lu Zhen & Chung-Yee Lee, 2021. "Liner Shipping Service Planning Under Sulfur Emission Regulations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(2), pages 491-509, March.
    3. Lu Zhen & Qian Sun & Wei Zhang & Kai Wang & Wen Yi, 2021. "Column generation for low carbon berth allocation under uncertainty," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(10), pages 2225-2240, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tan, Zhijia & Zhang, Ming & Shao, Shuai & Liang, Jinpeng & Sheng, Dian, 2022. "Evasion strategy for a coastal cargo ship with unpunctual arrival penalty under sulfur emission regulation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    2. Zeng, Xianyang & Tan, Zhijia & Zhang, Ming & Wang, Tingsong, 2024. "Scrubber installation of inland container ships: Discrepancy between government and carriers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    3. Tan, Zhijia & Zeng, Xianyang & Shao, Shuai & Chen, Jihong & Wang, Hua, 2022. "Scrubber installation and green fuel for inland river ships with non-identical streamflow," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    4. Sun, Yulong & Zheng, Jianfeng & Yang, Lingxiao & Li, Xia, 2024. "Allocation and trading schemes of the maritime emissions trading system: Liner shipping route choice and carbon emissions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 60-78.
    5. Asghari, Mohammad & Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Mirzapour Al-e-hashem, S.M.J., 2023. "Coordinating vessel recovery actions: Analysis of disruption management in a liner shipping service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 627-644.
    6. Jingwen Qi & Hans Wang & Jianfeng Zheng, 2022. "Shore Power Deployment Problem—A Case Study of a Chinese Container Shipping Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Lixian Fan & Hao Yang & Xinfang Zhang, 2024. "Targeting the Effectiveness Assessment of the Emission Control Policies on the Shipping Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Raeesi, Ramin & Sahebjamnia, Navid & Mansouri, S. Afshin, 2023. "The synergistic effect of operational research and big data analytics in greening container terminal operations: A review and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 943-973.
    9. Haoqing Wang & Wen Yi & Yannick Liu, 2022. "Optimal Route Design for Construction Waste Transportation Systems: Mathematical Models and Solution Algorithms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-13, November.
    10. Qinghe Sun & Li Chen & Mabel C. Chou & Qiang Meng, 2023. "Mitigating the financial risk behind emission cap compliance: A case in maritime transportation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(1), pages 283-300, January.
    11. Cao, Zhen & Wang, Wenyuan & Jiang, Ying & Xu, Xinglu & Xu, Yunzhuo & Guo, Zijian, 2022. "Joint berth allocation and ship loader scheduling under the rotary loading mode in coal export terminals," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 229-260.
    12. Di Wu & Xuejun Ji & Fang Xiao & Shijie Sheng, 2022. "A Location Inventory Routing Optimisation Model and Algorithm for a Remote Island Shipping Network considering Emergency Inventory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-22, May.
    13. Wang, Yadong & Gu, Yuyun & Wang, Tingsong & Zhang, Jun, 2022. "A risk-averse approach for joint contract selection and slot allocation in liner container shipping," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    14. Wang, Tingsong & Cheng, Peiyue & Zhen, Lu, 2023. "Green development of the maritime industry: Overview, perspectives, and future research opportunities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    15. Yang, Lingxiao & Zheng, Jianfeng & Wang, Jian & Hu, Xiaowei, 2023. "The maximal detour liner shipping hub location problem: Improving the applicability of the p-hub center problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    16. Yu, Jingjing & Tang, Guolei & Song, Xiangqun, 2022. "Collaboration of vessel speed optimization with berth allocation and quay crane assignment considering vessel service differentiation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    17. Buddhi A. Weerasinghe & H. Niles Perera & Xiwen Bai, 2024. "Optimizing container terminal operations: a systematic review of operations research applications," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 26(2), pages 307-341, June.
    18. Xinjia Gao & Aoshuang Zhu & Qifeng Yu, 2023. "Exploring the Carbon Abatement Strategies in Shipping Using System Dynamics Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-25, September.
    19. Yuzhe Zhao & Jingmiao Zhou & Zhongxiu Peng & Peng Jia, 2024. "Joint planning for fuel switching ships in a liner shipping network with transit time," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1-36, September.
    20. Yi-Hui Liao & Hsuan-Shih Lee, 2023. "Using a Directional Distance Function to Measure the Environmental Efficiency of International Liner Shipping Companies and Assess Regulatory Impact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3562-:d:773679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.