IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0250058.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differential perceptions of teamwork, focused work and perceived productivity as an effect of desk characteristics within a workplace layout

Author

Listed:
  • Kerstin Sailer
  • Petros Koutsolampros
  • Rosica Pachilova

Abstract

The impact of the physical workplace on behaviors and attitudes at work is a much-studied topic. Major research streams over the last decades investigated either satisfaction with offices in relation to physical comfort, or how layout decisions influenced interaction and collaboration in the workplace with a focus on open-plan offices. Rather little is known on the effect a workplace layout (such as its openness) has on perceptions of staff regarding teamwork, focused work and perceived productivity. We aim to close this gap by taking a differential approach which appreciates detailed variations within open-plan offices. Not every corner of an office is the same, so the question arises whether satisfaction with workspace differs depending on where someone is sitting. Bringing results of a staff survey in the UK headquarters of a global technology company together with a detailed analysis of spatial qualities at desks based on isovist and visual field analysis, we find that staff are less likely to rate their workplace environment favorably when they have higher numbers of desks within their own field of vision; and when they are facing away from the room with a relatively larger area behind their back compared to the area surrounding them. Aspects of teamwork that are negatively affected include sharing information with others, as well as team identity and cohesion. Focused work (concentration) and working productively are impacted even more so with the largest effect sizes throughout. These findings highlight the relevance of investigating detailed spatial qualities of micro-locations in workplace layouts. Our results also raise important questions regarding the current popular practice in workplace design of providing large open-plan offices for technology companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Kerstin Sailer & Petros Koutsolampros & Rosica Pachilova, 2021. "Differential perceptions of teamwork, focused work and perceived productivity as an effect of desk characteristics within a workplace layout," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0250058
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0250058
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0250058&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0250058?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luiz Bueno Silva & Carmem Julianne Beserra Melo & Adriana Gomes Lisboa de Souza & Lucas Guedes de Oliveira, 2024. "Ergonomics, Health, and Perceptions about Remote Domestic Workposts: Study in Areas of City of João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(7), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Olivia Phoeby Narenthiran & Jose Torero & Michael Woodrow, 2022. "Inclusive Design of Workspaces: Mixed Methods Approach to Understanding Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-29, March.
    3. Lisa Lim & Craig M. Zimring & Jennifer R. DuBose & Jaehoon Lee & Robert J. Stroebel & Marc R. Matthews, 2021. "Designing for Effective and Safe Multidisciplinary Primary Care Teamwork: Using the Time of COVID-19 as a Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-18, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0250058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.