IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i6p3157-d766329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Production Performance, Egg Quality Characteristics, Fatty Acid Profile and Health Lipid Indices of Produced Eggs, Blood Biochemical Parameters and Welfare Indicators of Laying Hens Fed Dried Olive Pulp

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Dedousi

    (Veterinary Research Institute, Hellenic Agricultural Organization DIMITRA, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Maria-Zoi Kritsa

    (Veterinary Research Institute, Hellenic Agricultural Organization DIMITRA, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Mirjana Đukić Stojčić

    (Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Themistoklis Sfetsas

    (Research & Development, Quality Control and Testing Services, QLAB Private Company, 57008 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Antonios Sentas

    (Quality Control Department of TSAKIRIS FAMILY SA, TSAKIRIS FAMILY SA, 54500 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Evangelia Sossidou

    (Veterinary Research Institute, Hellenic Agricultural Organization DIMITRA, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term dietary effects of dried olive pulp (OP) on production performance, fatty acid profile and health lipid indices and quality characteristics of produced eggs, health and welfare indicators of laying hens. It was carried out in a commercial poultry farm using 300 Isa Brown layers at 23 weeks of age. The hens were randomly and equally divided in six dietary groups CON, OP2, OP3, OP4, OP5 and OP6, according to the inclusion rate of OP in the ration (0%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5% and 6%, respectively). OP feeding increased the percentage of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) in eggs, decreased that of saturated fatty acids (SFA) and improved the PUFA to SFA ratio and health lipid indices, as indicated by the decrease of AI and TI and the increase in the h/H ratio of produced eggs, in a dose-dependent way. OP-fed layers presented a lower percentage of broken eggshells compared to controls. No adverse effects on birds’ performance, egg quality traits, health and welfare parameters were observed but a positive impact on Keel Bone Damage (KBD) incidence and belly plumage damage was recorded. OP feeding at the rates of 5% and 6% seems to be beneficial in improving egg nutrition quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Dedousi & Maria-Zoi Kritsa & Mirjana Đukić Stojčić & Themistoklis Sfetsas & Antonios Sentas & Evangelia Sossidou, 2022. "Production Performance, Egg Quality Characteristics, Fatty Acid Profile and Health Lipid Indices of Produced Eggs, Blood Biochemical Parameters and Welfare Indicators of Laying Hens Fed Dried Olive Pu," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3157-:d:766329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3157/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3157/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julio Berbel & Alejandro Posadillo, 2018. "Review and Analysis of Alternatives for the Valorisation of Agro-Industrial Olive Oil By-Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Dedousi & Sotiris I. Patsios & Maria-Zoi Kritsa & Konstantinos N. Kontogiannopoulos & Maria Ioannidou & Antonios Zdragas & Evangelia N. Sossidou, 2023. "Growth Performance, Meat Quality, Welfare and Behavior Indicators of Broilers Fed Diets Supplemented with Yarrowia lipolytica Yeast," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, January.
    2. Alexandru Usturoi & Marius-Giorgi Usturoi & Bogdan-Vlad Avarvarei & Claudia Pânzaru & Cristina Simeanu & Mădălina-Iuliana Usturoi & Mihaela Spătaru & Răzvan-Mihail Radu-Rusu & Marius-Gheorghe Doliş & , 2022. "Research Regarding Correlation between the Assured Health State for Laying Hens and Their Productivity," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Anna Dedousi & Charalampos Kotzamanidis & Maria-Zoi Kritsa & Antiopi Tsoureki & Aggeliki Andreadelli & Sotiris I. Patsios & Evangelia Sossidou, 2022. "Growth Performance, Gut Health, Welfare and Qualitative Behavior Characteristics of Broilers Fed Diets Supplemented with Dried Common ( Olea europaea ) Olive Pulp," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marquina, Jesús & Colinet, María José & Pablo-Romero, María del P., 2021. "The economic value of olive sector biomass for thermal and electrical uses in Andalusia (Spain)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    2. Massimiliano Borrello & Stefano Pascucci & Luigi Cembalo, 2020. "Three Propositions to Unify Circular Economy Research: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Do, Quynh & Mishra, Nishikant & Colicchia, Claudia & Creazza, Alessandro & Ramudhin, Amar, 2022. "An extended institutional theory perspective on the adoption of circular economy practices: Insights from the seafood industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    4. Mechthild Donner & Ivana Radić & Yamna Erraach & Fatima El Hadad-Gauthier, 2022. "Implementation of circular business models for olive oil waste and by-product valorization," Post-Print hal-03756908, HAL.
    5. Mechthild Donner & Ivana Radić & Yamna Erraach & Fatima El Hadad-Gauthier, 2022. "Implementation of Circular Business Models for Olive Oil Waste and By-Product Valorization," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Anxo Carreira-Casais & Paz Otero & Pascual Garcia-Perez & Paula Garcia-Oliveira & Antia G. Pereira & Maria Carpena & Anton Soria-Lopez & Jesus Simal-Gandara & Miguel A. Prieto, 2021. "Benefits and Drawbacks of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction for the Recovery of Bioactive Compounds from Marine Algae," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-25, August.
    7. Murillo Vetroni Barros & Rômulo Henrique Gomes Jesus & Bruno Silva Ribeiro & Cassiano Moro Piekarski, 2023. "Going in Circles: Key Aspects for Circular Economy Contributions to Agro-industrial Cooperatives," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 861-880, June.
    8. Mechthild Donner & Taoufik Yatribi & Yamna Erraach & Feliu López-I-Gelats & Judit Manuel & Ivana Radic & Sandrine Costa & Fatima El Hadad-Gauthier, 2021. "Valorising olive waste and by-products in the Mediterranean region: a socio-economic perspective," Post-Print hal-03275085, HAL.
    9. Mechthild Donner & Ivana Radić, 2021. "Innovative circular business models in the olive oil sector for sustainable mediterranean agrifood systems," Post-Print hal-03158870, HAL.
    10. Paweł Sobczak & Kazimierz Zawiślak & Agnieszka Starek & Wioletta Żukiewicz-Sobczak & Agnieszka Sagan & Beata Zdybel & Dariusz Andrejko, 2020. "Compaction Process as a Concept of Press-Cake Production from Organic Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-11, February.
    11. Cristina Truzzi & Silvia Illuminati & Federico Girolametti & Matteo Antonucci & Giuseppe Scarponi & Sara Ruschioni & Paola Riolo & Anna Annibaldi, 2019. "Influence of Feeding Substrates on the Presence of Toxic Metals (Cd, Pb, Ni, As, Hg) in Larvae of Tenebrio molitor : Risk Assessment for Human Consumption," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-15, November.
    12. Luca Adami & Marco Schiavon, 2021. "From Circular Economy to Circular Ecology: A Review on the Solution of Environmental Problems through Circular Waste Management Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    13. Muhammad Ashraf Sumrah & Muhammad Jan Leghari & Syed Hamza Mahfooz & Jamil Akhtar & Muhammad Farhan Khan Pasha & Muhammad Ramzan Anser, 2022. "Economical Olive Cultivation by Selection of Suitable Variety in Pothwar Region of Pakistan," Journal of Economic Impact, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 4(3), pages 213-217.
    14. Idiano D’Adamo & Pasquale Marcello Falcone & Massimo Gastaldi & Piergiuseppe Morone, 2019. "A Social Analysis of the Olive Oil Sector: The Role of Family Business," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-17, August.
    15. G. Venkatesh, 2022. "Circular Bio-economy—Paradigm for the Future: Systematic Review of Scientific Journal Publications from 2015 to 2021," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 231-279, March.
    16. Do, Quynh & Ramudhin, Amar & Colicchia, Claudia & Creazza, Alessandro & Li, Dong, 2021. "A systematic review of research on food loss and waste prevention and management for the circular economy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    17. Sarah Stempfle & Domenico Carlucci & Bernardo Corrado de Gennaro & Luigi Roselli & Giacomo Giannoccaro, 2021. "Available Pathways for Operationalizing Circular Economy into the Olive Oil Supply Chain: Mapping Evidence from a Scoping Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    18. Pablo Doménech & Aleta Duque & Isabel Higueras & Raquel Iglesias & Paloma Manzanares, 2020. "Biorefinery of the Olive Tree—Production of Sugars from Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Olive Stone Pretreated by Alkaline Extrusion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-13, September.
    19. Mechthild Donner & Ivana Radić, 2021. "Innovative Circular Business Models in the Olive Oil Sector for Sustainable Mediterranean Agrifood Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-21, February.
    20. José Carlos Martínez-Patiño & Irene Gómez-Cruz & Inmaculada Romero & Beatriz Gullón & Encarnación Ruiz & Mladen Brnčić & Eulogio Castro, 2019. "Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction as a First Step in a Biorefinery Strategy for Valorisation of Extracted Olive Pomace," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-13, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3157-:d:766329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.