IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2858-d761728.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological Restoration Strategies for the Topography of Loess Plateau Based on Adaptive Ecological Sensitivity Evaluation: A Case Study in Lanzhou, China

Author

Listed:
  • Honglei Cui

    (School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China)

  • Mei Liu

    (School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China)

  • Chen Chen

    (School of Art and Design, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China)

Abstract

Existing studies related to ecological sensitivity evaluation are comparatively mature; however, few approaches are concerned with distinctive topographical conditions that enable response to specific environmental restoration requirements. In this paper, an adaptive ecological sensitivity evaluation framework is established according to a representative plateau topography (i.e., the Loess Plateau region) via a case study of Gaolan County, China. Through the process of factor selection, index system construction, formula adaption, factor weight determination by analytic hierarchy process (AHP) as well as the support of RS and GIS technology, the ecological sensitivity of the research region has been evaluated and analyzed in combination with land use types and typical gully problems. The results show that high sensitivity areas account for 11.16 percent of the total area in the research region and a tendency for fragmentation in spatial distribution. Forest lands with steep slopes in gullies’ upstream have the highest ecological sensitivity, the proportion of forest and garden land dominated by trees in the highest sensitivity area is around 80 percent. Evidence-based ecological restoration strategies are proposed in terms of the topography of Loess Plateau. This study shows possibilities to adapt existing sensitivity evaluation model for medium-scaled specific topography problems and provides useful clues as a basis for knowledge acquisition that can feed into spatial design, planning and restoration processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Honglei Cui & Mei Liu & Chen Chen, 2022. "Ecological Restoration Strategies for the Topography of Loess Plateau Based on Adaptive Ecological Sensitivity Evaluation: A Case Study in Lanzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2858-:d:761728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2858/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2858/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jon Bergengren & Duane Waliser & Yuk Yung, 2011. "Ecological sensitivity: a biospheric view of climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 433-457, August.
    2. Xingxing Jin & Luyao Wei & Yi Wang & Yuqi Lu, 2021. "Construction of ecological security pattern based on the importance of ecosystem service functions and ecological sensitivity assessment: a case study in Fengxian County of Jiangsu Province, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 563-590, January.
    3. Yiping Liu & Chengpeng Lu & Jinhuang Mao & Jiaxing Pang & Zhiliang Liu & Muchen Hou, 2021. "Comprehensive Evaluation of the Importance of Ecological Land in Arid Hilly Cities in Northwest China: A Case Study of the Core Urban Area of Lanzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shufei Wang & Yining Zhuang & Yingui Cao & Kai Yang, 2022. "Ecosystem Service Assessment and Sensitivity Analysis of a Typical Mine–Agriculture–Urban Compound Area in North Shanxi, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Guanglong Dong & Zhonghao Liu & Yuanzhao Niu & Wenya Jiang, 2022. "Identification of Land Use Conflicts in Shandong Province from an Ecological Security Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Xinlei Xu & Siyuan Wang & Gege Yan & Xinyi He, 2023. "Ecological Security Assessment Based on the “Importance–Sensitivity–Connectivity” Index and Pattern Construction: A Case Study of Xiliu Ditch in the Yellow River Basin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ze Han & Wei Song & Xiangzheng Deng, 2016. "Responses of Ecosystem Service to Land Use Change in Qinghai Province," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Xinke Wang & Xiangqun Xie & Zhenfeng Wang & Hong Lin & Yan Liu & Huili Xie & Xingzhao Liu, 2022. "Construction and Optimization of an Ecological Security Pattern Based on the MCR Model: A Case Study of the Minjiang River Basin in Eastern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Zhenfeng Wang & Yan Liu & Xiangqun Xie & Xinke Wang & Hong Lin & Huili Xie & Xingzhao Liu, 2022. "Identifying Key Areas of Green Space for Ecological Restoration Based on Ecological Security Patterns in Fujian Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Xiaoxia Su & Jing Wu & Pengshuo Li & Renjie Li & Penggen Cheng, 2022. "RSEI-Based Modeling of Ecological Security and Its Spatial Impacts on Soil Quality: A Case Study of Dayu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Ziyi Liu & Xiaoyu Gan & Weining Dai & Ying Huang, 2022. "Construction of an Ecological Security Pattern and the Evaluation of Corridor Priority Based on ESV and the “Importance–Connectivity” Index: A Case Study of Sichuan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-25, March.
    6. Yayla Özgür & Keskin Emrah & Keles Hüseyin, 2022. "The Relationship Between Environmental Sensitivity, Ecological Attitude, and the Ecological Product purchasing Behaviour of Tourists," European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 31-45, December.
    7. Xueping Su & Yong Zhou & Qing Li, 2021. "Designing Ecological Security Patterns Based on the Framework of Ecological Quality and Ecological Sensitivity: A Case Study of Jianghan Plain, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-32, August.
    8. Fengjie Gao & Wei Yang & Si Zhang & Xiaohui Xin & Jun Zhou & Guoming Du, 2023. "An Integrated Approach to Constructing Ecological Security Pattern in an Urbanization and Agricultural Intensification Area in Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2858-:d:761728. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.