IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p2835-d1618339.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the Evolution of Ecological Sensitivity and Zoning Management for Sustainable Development in the Kuye River Basin

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Wang

    (College of Desert Control Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China)

  • Fucang Qin

    (College of Desert Control Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China
    Key Laboratory of State Forest Administration for Desert Ecosystem Protection and Restoration, Hohhot 010010, China
    Inner Mongolia Forestry Research Institute, Hohhot 010010, China)

  • Xiaoyu Dong

    (College of Desert Control Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China)

  • Yuan Yuan

    (College of Desert Control Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China)

  • Yihan Wu

    (College of Desert Control Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China)

Abstract

The Kuye River Basin, as an extremely important tributary of the Yellow River Basin, assessing its ecological environment’s response to human activities and natural environmental changes is of utmost importance. This can provide a critical reference for the protection of the ecological environment and sustainable development. This study selected major ecological and environmental issues in the study area, including soil erosion, water resources, and biodiversity, and constructed a comprehensive ecological sensitivity index using the spatial distance index model. Analyze the fluctuation intensity and trend of ecological sensitivity in the Kuye River Basin using grid coding models; use the Geodetector to analyze the main driving factors of its ecological sensitivity; and finally, adopt a method combining the “static” current state of ecological sensitivity with the “dynamic” trend of ecological sensitivity changes for ecological governance zoning. The results indicate the following: (1) the ecological sensitivity of the Kuye River Basin at different periods shows significant spatial differentiation, with a distribution pattern of low in the northwest and high in the central and southwestern areas in 2005, and a distribution pattern of low at both ends and high in the central area in 2020; (2) from 2005 to 2020, the overall ecological sensitivity showed a decreasing trend, with the area proportion of continuously declining regions accounting for 50.91%; (3) biodiversity is the main driving factor for the comprehensive ecological sensitivity of the Kuye River Basin; (4) the Kuye River Basin can be divided into four ecological zones: ecological environment protection area, ecological environment optimization area, ecological environment management area, and ecological environment governance area. Based on the characteristics of each region, it is recommended to adopt a differentiated ecological management plan to enhance the sustainability of its green development.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Wang & Fucang Qin & Xiaoyu Dong & Yuan Yuan & Yihan Wu, 2025. "Study on the Evolution of Ecological Sensitivity and Zoning Management for Sustainable Development in the Kuye River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:2835-:d:1618339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/2835/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/2835/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qiaoyin Zhang & Yan Wu & Zhiqiang Zhao, 2024. "Identification of Harbin Ecological Function Degradation Areas Based on Ecological Importance Assessment and Ecological Sensitivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Zahoor Ahmed & Mahmood Ahmad & Husam Rjoub & Olga A. Kalugina & Nazim Hussain, 2022. "Economic growth, renewable energy consumption, and ecological footprint: Exploring the role of environmental regulations and democracy in sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 595-605, August.
    3. Jon Bergengren & Duane Waliser & Yuk Yung, 2011. "Ecological sensitivity: a biospheric view of climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 433-457, August.
    4. Xingxing Jin & Luyao Wei & Yi Wang & Yuqi Lu, 2021. "Construction of ecological security pattern based on the importance of ecosystem service functions and ecological sensitivity assessment: a case study in Fengxian County of Jiangsu Province, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 563-590, January.
    5. Qiang Liu & Feihong Yu & Xingmin Mu, 2022. "Evaluation of the Ecological Environment Quality of the Kuye River Source Basin Using the Remote Sensing Ecological Index," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Ming Zhang & Jinpeng Wang & Runjuan Zhou, 2020. "Sustainable effect of coal mining on hydrological drought risk: a case study on Kuye river basin, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(3), pages 2929-2943, September.
    7. Sheng Yan & Yuan Yuan & Linfu Liu & Shuo Wang & Mingrui Li, 2024. "A Study of the Coupling Relationship Between Industry–Economy–Population and Habitat Quality in the Kuye River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-23, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Honglei Cui & Mei Liu & Chen Chen, 2022. "Ecological Restoration Strategies for the Topography of Loess Plateau Based on Adaptive Ecological Sensitivity Evaluation: A Case Study in Lanzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Ze Han & Wei Song & Xiangzheng Deng, 2016. "Responses of Ecosystem Service to Land Use Change in Qinghai Province," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Xingzhu Xiao & Yanxi Chen & Yongle Zhang & Min Huang & Hao Li, 2024. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Ecological Environment Quality Based on High-Quality Time-Series Data Reconstruction: A Case Study in the Sanjiangyuan Nature Reserve of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-27, July.
    4. Xinke Wang & Xiangqun Xie & Zhenfeng Wang & Hong Lin & Yan Liu & Huili Xie & Xingzhao Liu, 2022. "Construction and Optimization of an Ecological Security Pattern Based on the MCR Model: A Case Study of the Minjiang River Basin in Eastern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Uzma Ghafoor & Muhammad Ramzan Sheikh & Afsheen Baqir, 2023. "Green Growth, Environmental Quality, Energy Consumption Nexus in OECD Countries," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 12(4), pages 409-418.
    6. Guo, Wen & Yang, Bo & Ji, Jiong & Liu, Xiaorui, 2023. "Abundance of natural resources, government scale and green economic growth: An empirical study on urban resource curse," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    7. Waleed Kalf Al-Zoubi, 2024. "How Sustainable is Environmental Economics? A Review of Research Trends and Implications," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(2), pages 319-334, March.
    8. Licong Xing & Bisharat Hussain Chang & Salem Hamad Aldawsari, 2024. "Green Finance Mechanisms for Sustainable Development: Evidence from Panel Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-21, November.
    9. Zhao, Xin & Shang, Yuping & Magazzino, Cosimo & Madaleno, Mara & Mallek, Sabrine, 2023. "Multi-step impacts of environmental regulations on green economic growth: Evidence in the lens of natural resource dependence," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    10. Liu Junsong & Ridwan Lanre Ibrahim & Abubakar Mohammed & Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al-Faryan, 2024. "Exploring the heterogeneous effects of technological innovations on environmental sustainability: Do structural change, environmental policy, and biofuel energy matter for G7 economies?," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(4), pages 1818-1849, June.
    11. Lau, Chi Keung & Mahalik, Mantu Kumar & Rather, Kashif Nesar & Gozgor, Giray, 2023. "The impact of green quality of the energy consumption on carbon emissions in the United States," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 850-860.
    12. Mahvish Muzaffar & Ghulam Ghouse & Fahad Abdulrahman Alahmad, 2024. "Assessing the Interplay of Financial Development, Human Capital, Democracy, and Industry 5.0 in Environmental Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-30, August.
    13. Weiwei Zhang & Wanqian Zhang & Jianwan Ji & Chao Chen, 2024. "Urban Ecological Quality Assessment Based on Google Earth Engine and Driving Factors Analysis: A Case Study of Wuhan City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-23, April.
    14. Uzar, Umut, 2024. "The dynamic effect of income distribution, natural resources, and freedom of press on ecological footprint: Theory and empirical evidence for emerging economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    15. Zhang, Shaohui & Chen, Kenjie, 2023. "Green finance and ecological footprints: Natural resources perspective of China’s growing economy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    16. Zhenfeng Wang & Yan Liu & Xiangqun Xie & Xinke Wang & Hong Lin & Huili Xie & Xingzhao Liu, 2022. "Identifying Key Areas of Green Space for Ecological Restoration Based on Ecological Security Patterns in Fujian Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, September.
    17. Xiaoxia Su & Jing Wu & Pengshuo Li & Renjie Li & Penggen Cheng, 2022. "RSEI-Based Modeling of Ecological Security and Its Spatial Impacts on Soil Quality: A Case Study of Dayu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    18. Lina Tang & Alimujiang Kasimu & Haitao Ma & Mamattursun Eziz, 2023. "Monitoring Multi-Scale Ecological Change and Its Potential Drivers in the Economic Zone of the Tianshan Mountains’ Northern Slopes, Xinjiang, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-20, February.
    19. Yichen Fang & Lianhai Cao & Xinyu Guo & Tong Liang & Jiyin Wang & Ning Wang & Yue Chao, 2024. "Spatio-Temporal Heterogeneity of the Ecological Environment and Its Response to Land Use Change in the Chushandian Reservoir Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-21, February.
    20. Uzar, Umut, 2024. "The critical role of green innovation technologies and democracy in the transition to sustainability: A study on leading emerging market economies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:2835-:d:1618339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.