IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2840-d761202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Light and Water Conditions Co-Regulated Stomata and Leaf Relative Uptake Rate (LRU) during Photosynthesis and COS Assimilation: A Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Pengyuan Wang

    (Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100101, China
    School of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Beijing 100049, China)

  • Shaoqiang Wang

    (Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100101, China
    School of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Beijing 100049, China
    School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Bin Chen

    (Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100101, China
    School of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Beijing 100049, China)

  • Muhammad Amir

    (Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100101, China
    School of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Beijing 100049, China)

  • Lei Wang

    (Hefei Institute of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Hefei 230031, China)

  • Jinghua Chen

    (Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100101, China
    School of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Beijing 100049, China)

  • Li Ma

    (Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100101, China
    School of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Beijing 100049, China)

  • Xiaobo Wang

    (Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100101, China
    School of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Beijing 100049, China)

  • Yuanyuan Liu

    (Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100101, China
    School of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Beijing 100049, China)

  • Kai Zhu

    (Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100101, China
    School of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Beijing 100049, China)

Abstract

As a trace gas involved in hydration during plant photosynthesis, carbonyl sulfide (COS) and its leaf relative uptake rate (LRU) is used to reduce the uncertainties in simulations of gross primary productivity (GPP). In this study, 101 independent observations were collected from 22 studies. We extracted the LRU, stomatal conductance (g s ), canopy COS and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) fluxes, and relevant environmental conditions (i.e., light, temperature, and humidity), as well as the atmospheric COS and CO 2 concentrations ( C a , COS and C a , CO 2 ). Although no evidence was found showing that g s regulates LRU, they responded in opposite ways to diurnal variations of environmental conditions in both mixed forests (LRU: Hedges’d = −0.901, LnRR = −0.189; g s : Hedges’d = 0.785, LnRR = 0.739) and croplands dominated by C3 plants (Hedges’d = −0.491, LnRR = −0.371; g s : Hedges’d = 1.066, LnRR = 0.322). In this process, the stomata play an important role in COS assimilation (R 2 = 0.340, p = 0.020) and further influence the interrelationship of COS and CO 2 fluxes (R 2 = 0.650, p = 0.000). Slight increases in light intensity (R 2 = 1, p = 0.002) and atmospheric drought (R 2 = 0.885, p = 0.005) also decreased the LRU. The LRU saturation points of C a,COS and C a,CO2 were observed when ΔC a,COS ≈ 13 ppt (R 2 = 0.580, p = 0.050) or ΔC a,CO2 ≈ −18 ppm (R 2 = 0.970, p = 0.003). This study concluded that during plant photosynthesis and COS assimilation, light and water conditions co-regulated the stomata and LRU.

Suggested Citation

  • Pengyuan Wang & Shaoqiang Wang & Bin Chen & Muhammad Amir & Lei Wang & Jinghua Chen & Li Ma & Xiaobo Wang & Yuanyuan Liu & Kai Zhu, 2022. "Light and Water Conditions Co-Regulated Stomata and Leaf Relative Uptake Rate (LRU) during Photosynthesis and COS Assimilation: A Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2840-:d:761202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2840/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2840/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Wehr & J. W. Munger & J. B. McManus & D. D. Nelson & M. S. Zahniser & E. A. Davidson & S. C. Wofsy & S. R. Saleska, 2016. "Seasonality of temperate forest photosynthesis and daytime respiration," Nature, Nature, vol. 534(7609), pages 680-683, June.
    2. Alexander Knohl & Matthias Cuntz, 2017. "Tracing carbon fixation," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(6), pages 393-394, June.
    3. M. Campioli & Y. Malhi & S. Vicca & S. Luyssaert & D. Papale & J. Peñuelas & M. Reichstein & M. Migliavacca & M. A. Arain & I. A. Janssens, 2016. "Evaluating the convergence between eddy-covariance and biometric methods for assessing carbon budgets of forests," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Ph. Ciais & M. Reichstein & N. Viovy & A. Granier & J. Ogée & V. Allard & M. Aubinet & N. Buchmann & Chr. Bernhofer & A. Carrara & F. Chevallier & N. De Noblet & A. D. Friend & P. Friedlingstein & T. , 2005. "Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003," Nature, Nature, vol. 437(7058), pages 529-533, September.
    5. Gai, Chao & Dong, Yuping & Zhang, Tonghui, 2014. "Distribution of sulfur species in gaseous and condensed phase during downdraft gasification of corn straw," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 248-258.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Linghui Guo & Yuanyuan Luo & Yao Li & Tianping Wang & Jiangbo Gao & Hebing Zhang & Youfeng Zou & Shaohong Wu, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Changes and the Prediction of Drought Characteristics in a Major Grain-Producing Area of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Finger, Robert, 2010. "Evidence of slowing yield growth - The example of Swiss cereal yields," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 175-182, April.
    3. Martina Bozzola & Robert Finger, 2021. "Stability of risk attitude, agricultural policies and production shocks: evidence from Italy," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 48(3), pages 477-501.
    4. Bohn, Friedrich J. & Frank, Karin & Huth, Andreas, 2014. "Of climate and its resulting tree growth: Simulating the productivity of temperate forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 278(C), pages 9-17.
    5. Zhang, Yuliang & Wu, Zhiyong & Singh, Vijay P. & Lin, Qingxia & Ning, Shaowei & Zhou, Yuliang & Jin, Juliang & Zhou, Rongxing & Ma, Qiang, 2023. "Agricultural drought characteristics in a typical plain region considering irrigation, crop growth, and water demand impacts," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    6. Iris Vogeler & Christof Kluß & Tammo Peters & Friedhelm Taube, 2023. "How Much Complexity Is Required for Modelling Grassland Production at Regional Scales?," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    7. Yuqing Zhang & Guangxiong Mao & Changchun Chen & Liucheng Shen & Binyu Xiao, 2021. "Population Exposure to Compound Droughts and Heatwaves in the Observations and ERA5 Reanalysis Data in the Gan River Basin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-28, September.
    8. Yang Yang & Tianxiang Yue, 2024. "Variations of Global Compound Temperature and Precipitation Events and Associated Population Exposure Projected by the CMIP6 Multi-Model Ensemble," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-15, June.
    9. Nahuel Bautista & Bruno D. V. Marino & J. William Munger, 2021. "Science to Commerce: A Commercial-Scale Protocol for Carbon Trading Applied to a 28-Year Record of Forest Carbon Monitoring at the Harvard Forest," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, February.
    10. Xiaofei Yan & Qinxin Guo & Yajie Zhao & Yandong Zhao & Jianhui Lin, 2021. "Evaluation of Five Gas Diffusion Models Used in the Gradient Method for Estimating CO 2 Flux with Changing Soil Properties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-13, September.
    11. Reidsma, Pytrik & Ewert, Frank & Boogaard, Hendrik & Diepen, Kees van, 2009. "Regional crop modelling in Europe: The impact of climatic conditions and farm characteristics on maize yields," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 100(1-3), pages 51-60, April.
    12. Gai, Chao & Dong, Yuping & Zhang, Tonghui, 2014. "Downdraft gasification of corn straw as a non-woody biomass: Effects of operating conditions on chlorides distribution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 638-644.
    13. Sergio M. Vicente‐Serrano & Tim R. McVicar & Diego G. Miralles & Yuting Yang & Miquel Tomas‐Burguera, 2020. "Unraveling the influence of atmospheric evaporative demand on drought and its response to climate change," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), March.
    14. Ioannis Roussis & Dimitrios Beslemes & Chariklia Kosma & Vassilios Triantafyllidis & Anastasios Zotos & Evangelia Tigka & Antonios Mavroeidis & Stella Karydogianni & Varvara Kouneli & Ilias Travlos & , 2022. "The Influence of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus Rhizophagus irregularis on the Growth and Quality of Processing Tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) Seedlings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-12, July.
    15. Nilendu Singh & Bikash Ranjan Parida & Joyeeta Singh Charakborty & N.R. Patel, 2019. "Net Ecosystem Exchange of CO 2 in Deciduous Pine Forest of Lower Western Himalaya, India," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-20, May.
    16. Qifei Zhang & Yaning Chen & Zhi Li & Congjian Sun & Yanyun Xiang & Zhihui Liu, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Development of Vegetation Carbon Sinks and Sources in the Arid Region of Northwest China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-23, February.
    17. López-González, D. & Fernandez-Lopez, M. & Valverde, J.L. & Sanchez-Silva, L., 2014. "Gasification of lignocellulosic biomass char obtained from pyrolysis: Kinetic and evolved gas analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 456-467.
    18. Zhang, Qi & Yu, Xin & Qiu, Rangjian & Liu, Zhongxian & Yang, Zaiqiang, 2022. "Evolution, severity, and spatial extent of compound drought and heat events in north China based on copula model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    19. Verbeeck, Hans & Samson, Roeland & Granier, André & Montpied, Pierre & Lemeur, Raoul, 2008. "Multi-year model analysis of GPP in a temperate beech forest in France," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 210(1), pages 85-103.
    20. Qin Wang & Qin Ju & Yueyang Wang & Quanxi Shao & Rongrong Zhang & Yanli Liu & Zhenchun Hao, 2022. "Vegetation Changing Patterns and Its Sensitivity to Climate Variability across Seven Major Watersheds in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2840-:d:761202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.