IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1915-d744306.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forest Education with the Use of Educational Infrastructure in the Opinion of the Public-Experience from Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Natalia Korcz

    (Department of Natural Foundations of Forestry, Institute of Soil Science and Environment Management, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland)

  • Emilia Janeczko

    (Department of Forest Utilization, Institute of Forest Sciences, University of Life Sciences in Warsaw, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

In Poland, informal forest education is carried out mostly on forest educational paths, equipped with educational boards. Due to the diverse audience, an attempt was made to assess the elements supporting forest education from the perspective of forest users. The aim of the study is to determine the basic criteria that, in the opinion of path users, determine the use, attractiveness, and importance of educational boards in education. In an anonymous questionnaire, 504 people participated during meetings with an educator on paths in forests of the Regional Directorate of the State Forests in Lublin. In the opinion of trail users, boards are not an important element that should be present on educational trails; in their opinion, they moderately support informal forest education activities. Users generally paid attention to between one to two or three to four boards. The attractiveness of the boards is determined by the graphics of the whole board. Respondents would also prefer boards on which information is presented in graphical rather than text form. Our study indicates a somewhat negative perception of educational boards in forest education, which has prompted the authors to conduct further research in order to clarify forest users’ perceptions of the issues analyzed.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalia Korcz & Emilia Janeczko, 2022. "Forest Education with the Use of Educational Infrastructure in the Opinion of the Public-Experience from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1915-:d:744306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1915/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1915/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ballantyne, Roy & Packer, Jan & Falk, John, 2011. "Visitors’ learning for environmental sustainability: Testing short- and long-term impacts of wildlife tourism experiences using structural equation modelling," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1243-1252.
    2. Buckley, Ralf & Westaway, Diane, 2020. "Mental health rescue effects of women's outdoor tourism: A role in COVID-19 recovery," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    3. Martina Zámková & Martin Prokop, 2014. "Comparison of Consumer Behavior of Slovaks and Czechs in the Market of Organic Products by Using Correspondence Analysis," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 62(4), pages 783-795.
    4. Nenadic, Oleg & Greenacre, Michael, 2007. "Correspondence Analysis in R, with Two- and Three-dimensional Graphics: The ca Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 20(i03).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Greenacre, 2012. "Fuzzy coding in constrained ordinations," Economics Working Papers 1325, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    2. Jerome Agrusa & Cathrine Linnes & Joseph Lema & Jihye (Ellie) Min & Tony Henthorne & Holly Itoga & Harold Lee, 2021. "Tourism Well-Being and Transitioning Island Destinations for Sustainable Development," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Miroslav Rončák & Petr Scholz & Ivica Linderová, 2021. "Safety Concerns and Travel Behavior of Generation Z: Case Study from the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Anne Hardy & Leonie J. Pearson, 2016. "Determining Sustainable Tourism in Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Ju Hyoung Han & Andy S. Choi & Chi-Ok Oh, 2018. "The Effects of Environmental Value Orientations and Experience-Use History on the Conservation Value of a National Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Tilman Schmider & Anne Grethe Hestnes & Julia Brzykcy & Hannes Schmidt & Arno Schintlmeister & Benjamin R. K. Roller & Ezequiel Jesús Teran & Andrea Söllinger & Oliver Schmidt & Martin F. Polz & Andre, 2024. "Physiological basis for atmospheric methane oxidation and methanotrophic growth on air," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Richards, Greg & van der Ark, L. Andries, 2013. "Dimensions of cultural consumption among tourists: Multiple correspondence analysis," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 71-76.
    8. José F Baños-Pino & David Boto-García & Eduardo Del Valle & Inés Sustacha, 2023. "The impact of COVID-19 on tourists’ length of stay and daily expenditures," Tourism Economics, , vol. 29(2), pages 437-459, March.
    9. Michael Greenacre, 2008. "Correspondence analysis of raw data," Economics Working Papers 1112, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Jul 2009.
    10. Belém Barbosa & José Ramón Saura & Dag Bennett, 2024. "How do entrepreneurs perform digital marketing across the customer journey? A review and discussion of the main uses," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 69-103, February.
    11. Tisdell, Clement A., 2012. "Ecotourism Experiences Promoting Conservation and Changing Economic Values: The Case of Mon Repos Turtles," Economics, Ecology and Environment Working Papers 125209, University of Queensland, School of Economics.
    12. M. L. M. Souza & R. R. Bastos & M. D. T. Vieira, 2022. "Calculating weighted scores from a multiple correspondence analysis solution," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 4841-4854, December.
    13. Farzana Sharmin & Mohammad Tipu Sultan & Alina Badulescu & Dorin Paul Bac & Benqian Li, 2020. "Millennial Tourists’ Environmentally Sustainable Behavior Towards a Natural Protected Area: An Integrative Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-24, October.
    14. Alhamzah Alnoor & Bilal Eneizan & Hebah Zaki Makhamreh & Ibrahim Ali Rahoma, 2019. "The Effect of Reverse Logistics on Sustainable Manufacturing," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 9(1), pages 71-79, January.
    15. Lee, Tsung Hung & Jan, Fen-Hauh & Yang, Chung-Cheng, 2013. "Conceptualizing and measuring environmentally responsible behaviors from the perspective of community-based tourists," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 454-468.
    16. Greenacre, Michael, 2009. "Power transformations in correspondence analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 3107-3116, June.
    17. Packer, Jan & Ballantyne, Roy & Uzzell, David, 2019. "Interpreting war heritage: Impacts of Anzac museum and battlefield visits on Australians' understanding of national identity," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 105-116.
    18. Gangl, Katharina & Kastlunger, Barbara & Kirchler, Erich & Voracek, Martin, 2012. "Confidence in the economy in times of crisis: Social representations of experts and laypeople," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 603-614.
    19. Martina Zámková & Martin Prokop, 2014. "Comparison of Consumer Behavior of Slovaks and Czechs in the Market of Organic Products by Using Correspondence Analysis," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 62(4), pages 783-795.
    20. C. J. Torrecilla-Salinas & O. Troyer & M. J. Escalona & M. Mejías, 2019. "A Delphi-based expert judgment method applied to the validation of a mature Agile framework for Web development projects," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 9-40, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1915-:d:744306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.