IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1893-d743754.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolution Analysis of the Coupling Coordination of Microclimate and Landscape Ecological Risk Degree in the Xiahuayuan District in Recent 20 Years

Author

Listed:
  • Qiang Fan

    (School of Geomatics, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, China)

  • Yue Shi

    (School of Geomatics, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, China)

  • Xiaonan Song

    (School of Geomatics, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, China)

  • Hui Li

    (Chemical Geological Prospecting Institute of Liaoning Province Co., Ltd., Jinzhou 121000, China)

  • Wei Sun

    (Key Laboratory of Watershed Geographic Sciences, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China)

  • Feng Wu

    (Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

Abstract

Understanding the degree of interaction between microclimate and landscape risk in urban development is essential. This study analyzed the degree of interaction between microclimate and landscape ecological risk in 2000, 2010, and 2020 in the Xiahuayuan District in Zhangjiakou City, Hebei Province, China, using a coupled coordination degree model. The results show that the degree of landscape ecological risk in the Xiahuayuan District from 2000 to 2020 was mainly medium-high and high risk; the risk transfer area was 69.75 km 2 and 107.76 km 2 from 2000 to 2010 and 2010 to 2020, respectively. The surface temperature gradually decreased from west to east; the area of the middle temperate zone suitable for human habitation in 2000, 2010 and 2020 was 42.96%, 36.03% and 47.05%, respectively. The landscape ecological risk degree and surface temperature were closely related during the study period and interacted significantly. The coupling degree and coordination degree were dominated by high coupling degree and mutual coordination. The area of high coupling degree in 2000, 2010 and 2020 accounted for 79.53%, 78.07% and 85.06%, respectively; the area of mutual coordination degree accounted for 78.80%, 80.97% and 83.13%, respectively. The interaction between landscape ecological risk degree and surface temperature in the Xiahuayuan District was more evident, with strong coupling coordination.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiang Fan & Yue Shi & Xiaonan Song & Hui Li & Wei Sun & Feng Wu, 2022. "Evolution Analysis of the Coupling Coordination of Microclimate and Landscape Ecological Risk Degree in the Xiahuayuan District in Recent 20 Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-13, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1893-:d:743754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1893/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1893/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shuhan Liu & Dongyan Wang & Guoping Lei & Hong Li & Wenbo Li, 2019. "Elevated Risk of Ecological Land and Underlying Factors Associated with Rapid Urbanization and Overprotected Agriculture in Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Han Cai & Kun Ma & Yunjian Luo, 2019. "Geographical Modeling of Spatial Interaction between Built-Up Land Sprawl and Cultivated Landscape Eco-Security under Urbanization Gradient," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Manish Ramaiah & Ram Avtar & Md. Mustafizur Rahman, 2020. "Land Cover Influences on LST in Two Proposed Smart Cities of India: Comparative Analysis Using Spectral Indices," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Dong Wang & Xiang Ji & Cheng Li & Yaxi Gong, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Variations of Landscape Ecological Risks in a Resource-Based City under Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Tang, Zi, 2015. "An integrated approach to evaluating the coupling coordination between tourism and the environment," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 11-19.
    6. Sheng Liu & Ming Bai & Min Yao, 2021. "Integrating Ecosystem Function and Structure to Assess Landscape Ecological Risk in Traditional Village Clustering Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yuxia & Cao, Wenpu & Gao, Minyi & Gao, Yukun & Chi, Xingyu & Meng, Xing & Li, Shuang & Hu, Guohua, 2024. "Examining spatial coordination of human-land-industry-service system from a regionalization approach: A case study of Beijing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    2. Chengkun Huang & Feiyang Lin & Deping Chu & Lanlan Wang & Jiawei Liao & Junqian Wu, 2021. "Coupling Relationship and Interactive Response between Intensive Land Use and Tourism Industry Development in China’s Major Tourist Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Yaxi Gong & Xiang Ji & Yuan Zhang & Shanshan Cheng, 2023. "Spatial Vitality Evaluation and Coupling Regulation Mechanism of a Complex Ecosystem in Lixiahe Plain Based on Multi-Source Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-32, January.
    4. Panasiuk Aleksander, 2020. "Policy of Sustainable Development of Urban Tourism," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 27(2), pages 33-37, June.
    5. Siyu Gao & Haixiang Guo & Jing Yu, 2021. "Urban Water Inclusive Sustainability: Evidence from 38 Cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-32, February.
    6. Dongchuan Wang & Wengang Chen & Wei Wei & Broxton W. Bird & Lihui Zhang & Mengqin Sang & Qianqian Wang, 2016. "Research on the Relationship between Urban Development Intensity and Eco-Environmental Stresses in Bohai Rim Coastal Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Samereh Pourmoradian & Ali Vandshoari & Davoud Omarzadeh & Ayyoob Sharifi & Naser Sanobuar & Seyyed Samad Hosseini, 2021. "An Integrated Approach to Assess Potential and Sustainability of Handmade Carpet Production in Different Areas of the East Azerbaijan Province of Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Xin Duan & Shengli Dai & Rui Yang & Ziwei Duan & Yanhong Tang, 2020. "Environmental Collaborative Governance Degree of Government, Corporation, and Public," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, February.
    9. Jiangsu Li & Weihua Li & Bo Li & Liangrong Duan & Tianjiao Zhang & Qi Jia, 2022. "Construction Land Expansion of Resource-Based Cities in China: Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Driving Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Xingcheng Ge & Jun Xu & Yong Xie & Xin Guo & Deyan Yang, 2021. "Evaluation and Dynamic Evolution of Eco-Efficiency of Resource-Based Cities—A Case Study of Typical Resource-Based Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    11. Adina Letiţia Negruşa & Valentin Toader & Aurelian Sofică & Mihaela Filofteia Tutunea & Rozalia Veronica Rus, 2015. "Exploring Gamification Techniques and Applications for Sustainable Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-30, August.
    12. Yanli Gao & Hongbo Li & Yan Song, 2021. "Interaction Relationship between Urbanization and Land Use Multifunctionality: Evidence from Han River Basin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.
    13. Ying Gong & Xiao-Qiong Yang & Chun-Yan Ran & Victor Shi & Yu-Feng Zhou, 2021. "Evaluation of the Sustainable Coupling Coordination of the Logistics Industry and the Manufacturing Industry in the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, May.
    14. Yanting Zheng & Jing He & Wenxiang Zhang & Aifeng Lv, 2023. "Assessing Water Security and Coupling Coordination in the Lancang–Mekong River Basin for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-20, December.
    15. Dalia Perkumienė & Rasa Pranskūnienė & Milita Vienažindienė & Jurgita Grigienė, 2020. "The Right to A Clean Environment: Considering Green Logistics and Sustainable Tourism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-23, May.
    16. Dorijan Radočaj & Jasmina Obhođaš & Mladen Jurišić & Mateo Gašparović, 2020. "Global Open Data Remote Sensing Satellite Missions for Land Monitoring and Conservation: A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-24, October.
    17. Kai Wang & Menghan Wang & Chang Gan & Mihai Voda, 2019. "Residents’ Diachronic Perception of the Impacts of Ecological Resettlement in a World Heritage Site," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-17, September.
    18. Jiaguo Liu & Jinxia Zhou & Fan Liu & Xiaohang Yue & Yudan Kong & Xiaoye Wang, 2019. "Interaction Analysis and Sustainable Development Strategy between Port and City: The Case of Liaoning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-25, September.
    19. Zhe Cheng & Tianyu Zhao & Tao Song & Li Cui & Xinfa Zhou, 2022. "Assessing the Spatio-Temporal Pattern and Development Characteristics of Regional Ecological Resources for Sustainable Development: A Case Study on Guizhou Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, June.
    20. Yanyan Jia & Xiaolan Tang & Wei Liu, 2020. "Spatial–Temporal Evolution and Correlation Analysis of Ecosystem Service Value and Landscape Ecological Risk in Wuhu City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1893-:d:743754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.