IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1831-d742815.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of Sustainable Development Priorities for Agriculture through Sustainable Livelihood Security Indicators for Karnataka, India

Author

Listed:
  • Shankarappa Sridhara

    (Center for Climate Resilient Agriculture, University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shivamogga 577204, Karnataka, India)

  • Pradeep Gopakkali

    (Center for Climate Resilient Agriculture, University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shivamogga 577204, Karnataka, India)

  • Konapura Nagaraja Manoj

    (Center for Climate Resilient Agriculture, University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shivamogga 577204, Karnataka, India)

  • Kiran Kumar R. Patil

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shivamogga 577255, Karnataka, India)

  • Venkatesh Paramesh

    (ICAR-Central Coastal Agricultural Research Institute, Old Goa 403402, Goa, India)

  • Prakash Kumar Jha

    (Sustainable Intensification Innovation Lab, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA)

  • P. V. Vara Prasad

    (Sustainable Intensification Innovation Lab, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA
    Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA)

Abstract

To cope with worsening climate change and widening intergenerational equity issues, more impetus should be given to sustainable development. India, predominantly an agrarian economy, faces most pressing issues of sustainable development with a complex territorial hegemony of the population and their dynamic food demands. Regional production systems play a vital role in strengthening national sustainable development priorities in India. Hence, to realize the dimensions of sustainable development in a more meaningful way, sustainability needs to be prioritized in an agrarian economy. Sustainability is a complex phenomenon encompassing economic, ecological and equity dimensions. A modest attempt in this regard has been made to estimate normative sustainable indicators for Karnataka state considering 20 crucial indicators or variables governing different dimensions. Using principal component analysis and linear scoring techniques, a minimum dataset including forest cover, livestock and human population density, and cropping intensity governing ecological issues, groundwater availability and milk availability governing social equity issues, and net cropped area, land productivity, labor productivity, food grain productivity and fertilizer use governing economic efficiency was identified, constituting crucial indicators for the development of the sustainable livelihood security index. The computed index was used to classify districts in Karnataka into various sustainable categories. Among 27 districts, 13 districts were grouped as less sustainable, 4 as highly sustainable and 10 as moderately sustainable categories. This classification and knowledge provide clues for policy makers to transform less sustainable districts into moderately/highly sustainable ones by formulating suitable policies related to crucial factors. Formulated policies on crucial factors have a domino effect/causation effect and bring about desirable changes in all other indicator variables, leading to the sustainable development of the target districts in Karnataka. This approach can be used at different scales in other states in India and in other developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Shankarappa Sridhara & Pradeep Gopakkali & Konapura Nagaraja Manoj & Kiran Kumar R. Patil & Venkatesh Paramesh & Prakash Kumar Jha & P. V. Vara Prasad, 2022. "Identification of Sustainable Development Priorities for Agriculture through Sustainable Livelihood Security Indicators for Karnataka, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-23, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1831-:d:742815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1831/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1831/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajay Kumar Singh & Jofri Issac, 2018. "Impact of Climatic and Non-climatic Factors on Sustainable Livelihood Security in Gujarat State of India: A Statistical Exploration," Agriculture and Food Sciences Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 5(1), pages 30-46.
    2. Fabian Cruz & Yolanda Mena & Vicente Rodriguez-Estevez, 2018. "Methodologies for Assessing Sustainability in Farming Systems," Chapters, in: Soner Gokten & Pinar Okan Gokten (ed.), Sustainability Assessment and Reporting, IntechOpen.
    3. John M. Antle & Srabashi Ray, 2020. "Sustainable Agricultural Development," Palgrave Studies in Agricultural Economics and Food Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-3-030-34599-0, November.
    4. Jules Pretty & Tim G. Benton & Zareen Pervez Bharucha & Lynn V. Dicks & Cornelia Butler Flora & H. Charles J. Godfray & Dave Goulson & Sue Hartley & Nic Lampkin & Carol Morris & Gary Pierzynski & P. V, 2018. "Global assessment of agricultural system redesign for sustainable intensification," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(8), pages 441-446, August.
    5. Ajay Kumar Singh & Jofri Issac, 2018. "Impact of Climatic and Non-climatic Factors on Sustainable Livelihood Security in Gujarat State of India: A Statistical Exploration," Agriculture and Food Sciences Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 5(1), pages 30-46.
    6. Deepti Sharma & Shardendu Shardendu, 2011. "Assessing farm-level agricultural sustainability over a 60-year period in rural eastern India," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 325-337, September.
    7. Haroon Sajjad & Iffat Nasreen, 2016. "Assessing farm-level agricultural sustainability using site-specific indicators and sustainable livelihood security index: Evidence from Vaishali district, India," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(5), pages 602-619, October.
    8. John M. Antle & Srabashi Ray, 2020. "Sustainability of Agricultural Systems," Palgrave Studies in Agricultural Economics and Food Policy, in: Sustainable Agricultural Development, chapter 3, pages 43-94, Palgrave Macmillan.
    9. Viswanatha Reddy Krishna & Venkatesh Paramesh & Vadivel Arunachalam & Bappa Das & Hosam O. Elansary & Arjun Parab & Dendi Damodar Reddy & K. S. Shashidhar & Diaa O. El-Ansary & Eman A. Mahmoud & Moham, 2020. "Assessment of Sustainability and Priorities for Development of Indian West Coast Region: An Application of Sustainable Livelihood Security Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-19, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sofwan Farisyi & Mochammad Al Musadieq & Hamidah Nayati Utami & Cacik Rut Damayanti, 2022. "A Systematic Literature Review: Determinants of Sustainability Reporting in Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Adil Zia & Musaad Alzahrani & Abdullah Alomari & Fahad AlGhamdi, 2022. "Investigating the Drivers of Sustainable Consumption and Their Impact on Online Purchase Intentions for Agricultural Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shamsheer Haq & Ismet Boz, 2020. "Measuring environmental, economic, and social sustainability index of tea farms in Rize Province, Turkey," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2545-2567, March.
    2. Asrori Asrori & Muhammad Ihlashul Amal & Atta Putra Harjanto, 2019. "Company Characteristics on the Corporate Social Reporting Index of Corporate Social and Environmental Disclosure in Indonesian Public Companies," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(5), pages 481-488.
    3. Viswanatha Reddy Krishna & Venkatesh Paramesh & Vadivel Arunachalam & Bappa Das & Hosam O. Elansary & Arjun Parab & Dendi Damodar Reddy & K. S. Shashidhar & Diaa O. El-Ansary & Eman A. Mahmoud & Moham, 2020. "Assessment of Sustainability and Priorities for Development of Indian West Coast Region: An Application of Sustainable Livelihood Security Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Maria G. Lampridi & Claus G. Sørensen & Dionysis Bochtis, 2019. "Agricultural Sustainability: A Review of Concepts and Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-27, September.
    5. Vanishree Pabalkar & Rashmy Morey & Shivanand Rai, 2020. "Purchasing power of farmers - Challenges and opportunities in Indian Agriculture," Asian Journal of Agriculture and rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(1), pages 311-320, June.
    6. Pabalkar, Vanishree & Morey, Rashmy & Rai, Shivanand, 2020. "Purchasing Power of Farmers -- Challenges and Opportunities in Indian Agriculture," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 10(01), January.
    7. Morteza Zangeneh & Narges Banaeian & Sean Clark, 2021. "Meta-Analysis on Energy-Use Patterns of Cropping Systems in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-28, March.
    8. Jyoti, Bhim & Singh, Ajay Kumar, 2020. "Projected Sugarcane Yield in Different Climate Change Scenarios in Indian States: A State-Wise Panel Data Exploration," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 8(4), October.
    9. Keith B. Matthews & Ansel Renner & Kirsty L. Blackstock & Kerry A. Waylen & Dave G. Miller & Doug H. Wardell-Johnson & Alba Juarez-Bourke & Juan Cadillo-Benalcazar & Joep F. Schyns & Mario Giampietro, 2021. "Old Wine in New Bottles: Exploiting Data from the EU’s Farm Accountancy Data Network for Pan-EU Sustainability Assessments of Agricultural Production Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-26, September.
    10. Wenfeng Chi & Yuanyuan Zhao & Wenhui Kuang & Tao Pan & Tu Ba & Jinshen Zhao & Liang Jin & Sisi Wang, 2021. "Impact of Cropland Evolution on Soil Wind Erosion in Inner Mongolia of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Pirjo Peltonen-Sainio & Lauri Jauhiainen, 2019. "Risk of Low Productivity is Dependent on Farm Characteristics: How to Turn Poor Performance into an Advantage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, October.
    12. Naidoo, Dhesigen & Nhamo, Luxon & Mpandeli, Sylvester & Sobratee, Nafisa & Senzanje, Aidan & Liphadzi, Stanley & Slotow, Rob & Jacobson, Michael & Modi, Albert T. & Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe, 2021. "Operationalising the water-energy-food nexus through the theory of change," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    13. Verburg, René W. & Verberne, Emma & Negro, Simona O., 2022. "Accelerating the transition towards sustainable agriculture: The case of organic dairy farming in the Netherlands," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    14. Ranjan Roy & Ngai Weng Chan, 2012. "An assessment of agricultural sustainability indicators in Bangladesh: review and synthesis," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 99-110, March.
    15. Carlos Manuel Hernández & Aliou Faye & Mamadou Ousseynou Ly & Zachary P. Stewart & P. V. Vara Prasad & Leonardo Mendes Bastos & Luciana Nieto & Ana J. P. Carcedo & Ignacio Antonio Ciampitti, 2021. "Soil and Climate Characterization to Define Environments for Summer Crops in Senegal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    16. Sung Kyu Kim & Fiona Marshall & Neil M. Dawson, 2022. "Revisiting Rwanda’s agricultural intensification policy: benefits of embracing farmer heterogeneity and crop-livestock integration strategies," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(3), pages 637-656, June.
    17. Oriana Gava & Fabio Bartolini & Francesca Venturi & Gianluca Brunori & Alberto Pardossi, 2020. "Improving Policy Evidence Base for Agricultural Sustainability and Food Security: A Content Analysis of Life Cycle Assessment Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-29, February.
    18. Stefan C. Dekker & Aletta D. Kraneveld & Jerry van Dijk & Agni Kalfagianni & Andre C. Knulst & Herman Lelieveldt & Ellen H. M. Moors & Eggo Müller & Raymond H. H. Pieters & Corné M. J. Pieterse & Step, 2020. "Towards Healthy Planet Diets—A Transdisciplinary Approach to Food Sustainability Challenges," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, September.
    19. Subham Roy & Arghadeep Bose & Debanjan Basak & Indrajit Roy Chowdhury, 2024. "Towards sustainable society: the sustainable livelihood security (SLS) approach for prioritizing development and understanding sustainability: an insight from West Bengal, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 20095-20126, August.
    20. Wang, Tianyu & Wang, Zhenhua & Guo, Li & Zhang, Jinzhu & Li, Wenhao & He, Huaijie & Zong, Rui & Wang, Dongwang & Jia, Zhecheng & Wen, Yue, 2021. "Experiences and challenges of agricultural development in an artificial oasis: A review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1831-:d:742815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.