IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1677-d739995.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Rankine Cycle Linear Fresnel Reflector and Solar Tower Plant Technologies: Techno-Economic Analysis for Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Salah Kamel

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Aswan University, Aswan 81542, Egypt)

  • Ephraim Bonah Agyekum

    (Department of Nuclear and Renewable Energy, Ural Federal University Named after the First President of Russia Boris Yeltsin, 19 Mira Street, 620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia)

  • Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Cyprus International University, North Cyprus, Via Mersin 10, Nicosia 99258, Turkey
    Department of Finance & Accounting, Akfa University, 1st Deadlock, 10th Kukcha Darvoza Street, Tashkent 100012, Uzbekistan)

  • Ibrahim B. M. Taha

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Taif University, P.O. Box. 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia)

  • Bright Akwasi Gyamfi

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Cyprus International University, North Cyprus, Via Mersin 10, Nicosia 99258, Turkey)

  • Salam J. Yaqoob

    (Department of Research and Education, Authority of the Popular Crowd, Baghdad 10001, Iraq)

Abstract

The need to meet the world’s growing demand for energy in an environmentally sustainable manner has led to the exploration of various renewable energy (RE) resources for power generation. The objective of this study is to examine the techno-economic potential of concentrated solar power plants (i.e., linear Fresnel reflector (LFR) and central receiver system (CRS) for electricity generation in Eastern African countries with a case study on Ethiopia. The study was conducted using the System Advisor Model (SAM). In order to estimate the economics of the two power plants, the Levelized cost of energy (LCOE) and the net present value (NPV) metrics were used. According to results obtained from the simulations, the LFR produced annual energy of 528 TWh at a capacity factor (CF) of 60.3%. The CRS also produced a total of 540 TWh at a CF of 61.9%. The LCOE (real) for the CRS is found to be 9.44 cent/kWh against 10.35 cent/kWh for the LFR. The NPV for both technologies is found to be positive for inflation rates of 2% and below. An inflation rate above 2% renders the two power plants financially impracticable. A real discount rate above 9% also renders both projects economically unviable. Based on the obtained results, the CRS system is identified as the best technology for electricity generation under the Jijiga climatic condition in Ethiopia.

Suggested Citation

  • Salah Kamel & Ephraim Bonah Agyekum & Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo & Ibrahim B. M. Taha & Bright Akwasi Gyamfi & Salam J. Yaqoob, 2022. "Comparative Analysis of Rankine Cycle Linear Fresnel Reflector and Solar Tower Plant Technologies: Techno-Economic Analysis for Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1677-:d:739995
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1677/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1677/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ikejemba, Eugene C.X. & Schuur, Peter C. & Van Hillegersberg, Jos & Mpuan, Peter B., 2017. "Failures & generic recommendations towards the sustainable management of renewable energy projects in Sub-Saharan Africa (Part 2 of 2)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 639-647.
    2. Pueyo, Ana, 2018. "What constrains renewable energy investment in Sub-Saharan Africa? A comparison of Kenya and Ghana," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 85-100.
    3. Sweerts, Bart & Longa, Francesco Dalla & van der Zwaan, Bob, 2019. "Financial de-risking to unlock Africa's renewable energy potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 75-82.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ghaithan, Ahmed & Hadidi, Laith & Mohammed, Awsan, 2024. "Techno-economic assessment of concentrated solar power generation in Saudi Arabia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    2. Hanane Ait Lahoussine Ouali & Ahmed Alami Merrouni & Shahariar Chowdhury & Kuaanan Techato & Sittiporn Channumsin & Nasim Ullah, 2022. "Optimization and Techno-Economic Appraisal of Parabolic Trough Solar Power Plant under Different Scenarios: A Case Study of Morocco," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Seepana Praveenkumar & Aminjon Gulakhmadov & Abhinav Kumar & Murodbek Safaraliev & Xi Chen, 2022. "Comparative Analysis for a Solar Tracking Mechanism of Solar PV in Five Different Climatic Locations in South Indian States: A Techno-Economic Feasibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ishaya Tambari & Pierre Failler, 2020. "Determining If Oil Prices Significantly Affect Renewable Energy Investment in African Countries with Energy Security Concerns," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.
    2. van der Zwaan, Bob & Lamboo, Sam & Dalla Longa, Francesco, 2021. "Timmermans’ dream: An electricity and hydrogen partnership between Europe and North Africa," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    3. Jeffrey Kouton, 2021. "The impact of renewable energy consumption on inclusive growth: panel data analysis in 44 African countries," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 145-170, February.
    4. Talan, Amogh & Rao, Amar & Sharma, Gagan Deep & Apostu, Simona-Andreea & Abbas, Shujaat, 2023. "Transition towards clean energy consumption in G7: Can financial sector, ICT and democracy help?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Briera, Thibault & Lefèvre, Julien, 2024. "Reducing the cost of capital through international climate finance to accelerate the renewable energy transition in developing countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    6. Ikejemba, Eugene C.X. & Schuur, Peter C., 2020. "The empirical failures of attaining the societal benefits of renewable energy development projects in Sub-Saharan Africa," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1490-1498.
    7. Florian Egli & Churchill Agutu & Bjarne Steffen & Tobias S. Schmidt, 2023. "The cost of electrifying all households in 40 Sub-Saharan African countries by 2030," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Yazdanie, M. & Orehounig, K., 2021. "Advancing urban energy system planning and modeling approaches: Gaps and solutions in perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    9. Nthambi, Mary & Wätzold, Frank & Markova-Nenova, Nonka, 2018. "Quantifying benefit losses from poor governance of climate change adaptation projects: A discrete choice experiment with farmers in Kenya," MPRA Paper 94678, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Kathleen Mallard & Vincent Debusschere & Lauric Garbuio, 2020. "Multi-Criteria Method for Sustainable Design of Energy Conversion Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-18, August.
    11. Francesco Mancini & Benedetto Nastasi, 2020. "Solar Energy Data Analytics: PV Deployment and Land Use," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    12. Opoku, Richard & Obeng, George Y. & Adjei, Eunice A. & Davis, Francis & Akuffo, Fred O., 2020. "Integrated system efficiency in reducing redundancy and promoting residential renewable energy in countries without net-metering: A case study of a SHS in Ghana," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 65-78.
    13. Wang, Yongpei & Yan, Qing & Luo, Yifei & Zhang, Qian, 2023. "Carbon abatement of electricity sector with renewable energy deployment: Evidence from China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 1-11.
    14. Francis Kemausuor & Muyiwa S. Adaramola & John Morken, 2018. "A Review of Commercial Biogas Systems and Lessons for Africa," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, November.
    15. Ulaş Ünlü & Furkan Yıldırım & Ayhan Kuloğlu & Ersan Ersoy & Emin Hüseyin Çetenak, 2022. "Nexus between Renewable Energy, Credit Gap Risk, Financial Development and R&D Expenditure: Panel ARDL Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Dejun Qiu & Hasan Dinçer & Serhat Yüksel & Gözde Gülseven Ubay, 2020. "Multi-Faceted Analysis of Systematic Risk-Based Wind Energy Investment Decisions in E7 Economies Using Modified Hybrid Modeling with IT2 Fuzzy Sets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, March.
    17. Katharina Löhr & Custódio Efraim Matavel & Sophia Tadesse & Masoud Yazdanpanah & Stefan Sieber & Nadejda Komendantova, 2022. "Just Energy Transition: Learning from the Past for a More Just and Sustainable Hydrogen Transition in West Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, December.
    18. Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary & Naoyuki Yoshino, 2020. "Sustainable Solutions for Green Financing and Investment in Renewable Energy Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Shahnazi, Rouhollah & Alimohammadlou, Moslem, 2022. "Investigating risks in renewable energy in oil-producing countries through multi-criteria decision-making methods based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets: A case study of Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 1009-1027.
    20. Abba, Z.Y.I. & Balta-Ozkan, N. & Hart, P., 2022. "A holistic risk management framework for renewable energy investments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1677-:d:739995. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.