IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1503-d736218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Child Pedestrian Safety: Study of Street-Crossing Behaviour of Primary School Children with Adult Supervision

Author

Listed:
  • Malik Sarmad Riaz

    (Civil Engineering Department—National University of Technology (NUTECH), Islamabad, Pakistan)

  • Ariane Cuenen

    (UHasselt—Hasselt University, Transportation Research Institute (IMOB), School of Transportation Sciences, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium)

  • Evelien Polders

    (UHasselt—Hasselt University, Transportation Research Institute (IMOB), School of Transportation Sciences, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium)

  • Muhammad Bilal Akram

    (UHasselt—Hasselt University, Transportation Research Institute (IMOB), School of Transportation Sciences, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium)

  • Moustafa Houda

    (College of Engineering and Technology, American University of the Middle East, Kuwait)

  • Davy Janssens

    (UHasselt—Hasselt University, Transportation Research Institute (IMOB), School of Transportation Sciences, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium)

  • Marc Azab

    (College of Engineering and Technology, American University of the Middle East, Kuwait)

Abstract

Road traffic accidents are the primary cause of injuries and fatalities among children. The current study focuses on children’s (un)safe crossing behaviour in a real traffic situation accompanied by an adult at a crosswalk in front of their school. The study aims to investigate if there are differences in crossing behaviour related to road infrastructure (i.e., one-way and two-way street, elevated and non-elevated street crossing), the gender of the child, and the effect of the accompanying adult’s behaviour on the child’s crossing behaviour. Primary school children from two urban schools in Flanders (Belgium) were observed for three days while crossing the street in front of their school in the morning and afternoon. A total of 241 child–adult pairs were observed. Descriptive analysis, Pearson chi-square tests, and binary logistic regression models were used to find differences between groups. More than half of the crossings exhibited two or more unsafe behaviours. Not stopping at the curb before crossing was the most unsafe behaviour, exhibited by 47.7% of children; not looking for oncoming traffic before and during the crossing was the second most unsafe behaviour, exhibited by 39.4% of the children. The only difference between boys’ and girls’ crossing behaviour was in stopping at the curb with girls 1.901 times more likely to stop before crossing as compared to boys. Adults holding hands of the child resulted in safer behaviours by children. The children not holding hands displayed significantly riskier behaviour in running or hopping while crossing the street and being distracted. The study reinforces the need to improve the transportation system through infrastructural interventions (elevated crosswalks), as well as educating and training children and the parents on safe crossing behaviour in traffic.

Suggested Citation

  • Malik Sarmad Riaz & Ariane Cuenen & Evelien Polders & Muhammad Bilal Akram & Moustafa Houda & Davy Janssens & Marc Azab, 2022. "Child Pedestrian Safety: Study of Street-Crossing Behaviour of Primary School Children with Adult Supervision," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1503-:d:736218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1503/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1503/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irena Ištoka Otković & Aleksandra Deluka-Tibljaš & Sanja Šurdonja & Tiziana Campisi, 2021. "Development of Models for Children—Pedestrian Crossing Speed at Signalized Crosswalks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Nkurunziza & Rahman Tafahomi & Irumva Augustin Faraja, 2023. "Pedestrian Safety: Drivers’ Stopping Behavior at Crosswalks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Hiroki Ohnishi & Makoto Fujiu & Yuma Morisaki & Junichi Takayama, 2023. "Fundamental Analysis of the Ages of Children and Road Structures Involved in Traffic Accidents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marie-Soleil Cloutier & Mojgan Rafiei & Lambert Desrosiers-Gaudette & Zeinab AliYas, 2022. "An Examination of Child Pedestrian Rule Compliance at Crosswalks around Parks in Montreal, Canada," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Chiara Gruden & Irena Ištoka Otković & Matjaž Šraml, 2021. "Safety Analysis of Young Pedestrian Behavior at Signalized Intersections: An Eye-Tracking Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Irena Ištoka Otković & Barbara Karleuša & Aleksandra Deluka-Tibljaš & Sanja Šurdonja & Mario Marušić, 2021. "Combining Traffic Microsimulation Modeling and Multi-Criteria Analysis for Sustainable Spatial-Traffic Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-26, June.
    4. Wang, Qiao & Chen, Juan & Jiang, Rui & Song, Weiguo & Li, Ruoyu & Lian, Liping & Ma, Jian, 2023. "Experimental study on the zebra crossing traffic flow characteristics of mixed bicycles and pedestrians," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    5. Li, Weigang & Liu, Jian, 2023. "Analysis of the evolution of pedestrian crossing based on dynamic penalty mechanism," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 623(C).
    6. Piotr Szagała & Piotr Olszewski & Witold Czajewski & Paweł Dąbkowski, 2021. "Active Signage of Pedestrian Crossings as a Tool in Road Safety Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-13, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1503-:d:736218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.