IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1217-d730273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Abnormal Climatic Events on the CPUE of Yellowfin Tuna Fishing in the Central and Western Pacific

Author

Listed:
  • Weifeng Zhou

    (Key Laboratory of Fishery Resources Remote Sensing Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Shanghai 200090, China
    East China Sea Fishery Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Shanghai 200090, China)

  • Huijuan Hu

    (Key Laboratory of Fishery Resources Remote Sensing Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Shanghai 200090, China
    College of Marine Sciences, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Wei Fan

    (East China Sea Fishery Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Shanghai 200090, China)

  • Shaofei Jin

    (Department of Geography, Minjiang University, Fuzhou 350108, China)

Abstract

To explore the impact of climate change on fishery resources, the temporal and spatial characteristics of the thermocline in the main yellowfin tuna purse-seine fishing grounds in the western and central Pacific Ocean during La Niña and El Niño years were studied using the 2008–2017 Argo grid data (BOA_Argo) and the log data of commercial fishing vessels. A generalized additive model (GAM) was used to analyze the variables affecting yellowfin tuna fishing grounds. The results showed that in La Niña years, the catch per unit effort (CPUE) moved westward as the high-value zone of the upper boundary contracted westward to 145° E, and in the El Niño years this moved eastward to 165° E. Compared with normal years, the upper boundary depth difference of the thermocline on the east and west sides of the equatorial Pacific was larger in La Niña years, and the upper boundary depth of 80–130 m shifted westward. The thermocline strength was generally weaker in the west and stronger in the east. The thermocline had two band-like distribution structures with an axis at 15° N and 15° S. The CPUE was distributed from 120 m to 200 m. The CPUE distribution was dense when the temperature range of the upper boundary of the thermocline was 27.5–29.5 °C, and the intensity was 0.08–0.13 °C·m −1 . The upper-boundary temperature had the greatest impact on the CPUE. The eastward shift of the CPUE during El Niño and the westward shift during La Niña were associated with the optimal thermocline parameter values. The factor of year had a fluctuating effect on the CPUE, and the influence of the La Niña years was greater. The areas with high abundance were 5° N–5° S and 150° E–175° E. The results showed that the changes in the thermocline caused by abnormal climate events significantly affected the CPUE.

Suggested Citation

  • Weifeng Zhou & Huijuan Hu & Wei Fan & Shaofei Jin, 2022. "Impact of Abnormal Climatic Events on the CPUE of Yellowfin Tuna Fishing in the Central and Western Pacific," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1217-:d:730273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1217/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1217/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jessica K. McCluney & Christopher M. Anderson & James L. Anderson, 2019. "The fishery performance indicators for global tuna fisheries," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Patrick Lehodey & Inna Senina & Beatriz Calmettes & John Hampton & Simon Nicol, 2013. "Modelling the impact of climate change on Pacific skipjack tuna population and fisheries," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 95-109, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Lijun & Chu, Jingjie & Anderson, James L. & Xu, Jintao, 2021. "Sustainability Comparisons in the Triple Bottom Line for Chinese Fisheries," EfD Discussion Paper 21-1, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    2. Renau, Jorge Marco & Valbuena, Nicolas & Valderrama, Diego & Vasquez, Monica, 2024. "Examining the Success of the Tilapia Industry in Huila, an Emerging Aquaculture Hub in the Colombian Southwest," EfD Discussion Paper 24-3, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    3. Evans, K. & Young, J.W. & Nicol, S. & Kolody, D. & Allain, V. & Bell, J. & Brown, J.N. & Ganachaud, A. & Hobday, A.J. & Hunt, B. & Innes, J. & Gupta, A. Sen & van Sebille, E. & Kloser, R. & Patterson,, 2015. "Optimising fisheries management in relation to tuna catches in the western central Pacific Ocean: A review of research priorities and opportunities," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 94-104.
    4. Fang, Yingkai & Asche, Frank, 2021. "Can U.S. import regulations reduce IUU fishing and improve production practices in aquaculture?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    5. Hanny John Mediodia & Viktoria Kahui & Ilan Noy, 2023. "Sea Surface Temperature and Tuna Catch in the Eastern Pacific Ocean under Climate Change," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 38(4), pages 329-351.
    6. Bell, Johann D. & Albert, Joelle & Andréfouët, Serge & Andrew, Neil L. & Blanc, Michel & Bright, Philip & Brogan, Deidre & Campbell, Brooke & Govan, Hugh & Hampton, John & Hanich, Quentin & Harley, Sh, 2015. "Optimising the use of nearshore fish aggregating devices for food security in the Pacific Islands," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 98-105.
    7. Johanson, Arne N. & Oschlies, Andreas & Hasselbring, Wilhelm & Worm, Boris, 2017. "SPRAT: A spatially-explicit marine ecosystem model based on population balance equations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 349(C), pages 11-25.
    8. M. Salinger, 2013. "A brief introduction to the issue of climate and marine fisheries," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 23-35, July.
    9. Maria B. Forleo & Nadia Palmieri, 2023. "Environmental Attributes of Wild versus Farmed Tuna: Beliefs, Knowledge and Purchasing Choices of Italian Consumers of Canned Tuna," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, April.
    10. Johann D. Bell & Inna Senina & Timothy Adams & Olivier Aumont & Beatriz Calmettes & Sangaalofa Clark & Morgane Dessert & Marion Gehlen & Thomas Gorgues & John Hampton & Quentin Hanich & Harriet Harden, 2021. "Pathways to sustaining tuna-dependent Pacific Island economies during climate change," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(10), pages 900-910, October.
    11. Garlock, Taryn M. & Asche, Frank & Akpalu, Wisdom & Amaechina, Ebele Chinelo & Chukwuone, Nnaemeka Andegbe & Hutchings, Ken & Lokina, Razack & Tibesigwa, Byela & Turpie, Jane & Eggert, Håkan, 2020. "Fisheries Performance in Africa: An Analysis Based on Data from 14 Countries," EfD Discussion Paper 20-24, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    12. Brian Pentz & Nicole Klenk, 2020. "Understanding the limitations of current RFMO climate change adaptation strategies: the case of the IATTC and the Eastern Pacific Ocean," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 21-39, March.
    13. Eegunjobi, Ruth, 2023. "Seafood Export Performance Effects of Industrial Upgrading: Evidence from Namibia’s Industrial Policy," African Journal of Economic Review, African Journal of Economic Review, vol. 11(4), September.
    14. Jim Salinger & Alistair Hobday, 2013. "Safeguarding the future of oceanic fisheries under climate change depends on timely preparation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 3-8, July.
    15. M. Salinger & J. Bell & K. Evans & A. Hobday & V. Allain & K. Brander & P. Dexter & D. Harrison & A. Hollowed & B. Lee & R. Stefanski, 2013. "Climate and oceanic fisheries: recent observations and projections and future needs," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 213-221, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1217-:d:730273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.