IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i24p16715-d1002345.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

(Re)Defining Restorative and Regenerative Urban Design and Their Relation to UNSDGs—A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Qingchang He

    (Marcel Breuer Doctoral School, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary)

  • Andras Reith

    (Advanced Building and Urban Design, Orlay street 2/b, 1114 Budapest, Hungary
    BIM Skills Lab Research Group, Department of Engineering Studies, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Boszorkány Street 2, 7624 Pécs, Hungary)

Abstract

The 1992, the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development highlighted that human impacts on the environment should be reduced. Against this backdrop, publications on restorative and regenerative urban design first appeared in the mid-1990s, and both disciplines have developed rapidly up to the present time. However, there is still some uncertainty regarding the interrelationships and differences between these two terms, and their association with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Based on a search of the Web of Science database, a total of 117 papers were studied with the help of VOS viewer and R studio. The differences between the two disciplines and their respective associations with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals were analyzed using key performance indicators. Detailed analysis was used to explore their current development status. Scientific publication and citation network analyses were used to examine the historical developments and interrelationships between two disciplines. The review revealed that both disciplines are closely related to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, especially regenerative urban design, but they have developed independently in the field of urban design. Unlike the descriptions found in many of the identified papers, restorative urban design not only focuses on ecological aspects but also attempts to create a built environment that allows its users to thrive both physically and mentally. Regenerative urban design is more inclined to restore or create an “ability”. Further, both disciplines are in their infancy but have evolved from internal conceptual development to the stage of exploring external relationships and frameworks as well as mechanisms. This review found that although many frameworks and models are used to support and evaluate these two disciplines, almost all of them fail to integrate necessary aspects of the ecosystem, e.g., elements, relationships, processes, etc. Moreover, future work should examine the design patterns that are closely related to restorative and regenerative urban design to better guide the concrete practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Qingchang He & Andras Reith, 2022. "(Re)Defining Restorative and Regenerative Urban Design and Their Relation to UNSDGs—A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-29, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16715-:d:1002345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16715/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16715/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Piero Morseletto, 2020. "Restorative and regenerative: Exploring the concepts in the circular economy," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(4), pages 763-773, August.
    2. Giulia Sonetti & Martin Brown & Emanuele Naboni, 2019. "About the Triggering of UN Sustainable Development Goals and Regenerative Sustainability in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Lorna Dargan, 2009. "Participation and Local Urban Regeneration: The Case of the New Deal for Communities (NDC) in the UK," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 305-317.
    4. Naboni, Emanuele & Natanian, Jonathan & Brizzi, Giambattista & Florio, Pietro & Chokhachian, Ata & Galanos, Theodoros & Rastogi, Parag, 2019. "A digital workflow to quantify regenerative urban design in the context of a changing climate," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Tiziano Cattaneo & Emanuele Giorgi & Mauricio Flores & Viviana Barquero, 2020. "Territorial Effects of Shared-Living Heritage Regeneration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-28, October.
    6. Maria Cerreta & Chiara Mazzarella & Martina Spiezia & Maria Rosaria Tramontano, 2020. "Regenerativescapes: Incremental Evaluation for the Regeneration of Unresolved Territories in East Naples," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, August.
    7. Giles Thomson & Peter Newman, 2020. "Cities and the Anthropocene: Urban governance for the new era of regenerative cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(7), pages 1502-1519, May.
    8. Eduardo Natividade-Jesus & Arminda Almeida & Nuno Sousa & João Coutinho-Rodrigues, 2019. "A Case Study Driven Integrated Methodology to Support Sustainable Urban Regeneration Planning and Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Ekaterina Shafray & Seiyong Kim, 2017. "A Study of Walkable Spaces with Natural Elements for Urban Regeneration: A Focus on Cases in Seoul, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-20, April.
    10. Raul P. Lejano & Wing-Shan Kan, 2015. "Seeing urban regeneration through an institutional lens: toward a new contextualism," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 257-268, November.
    11. Hung Hing Chan & Tai-Shan Hu & Peilei Fan, 2019. "Social sustainability of urban regeneration led by industrial land redevelopment in Taiwan," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(7), pages 1245-1269, July.
    12. Jennifer Morash & Amy Wright & Charlene LeBleu & Amanda Meder & Raymond Kessler & Eve Brantley & Julie Howe, 2019. "Increasing Sustainability of Residential Areas Using Rain Gardens to Improve Pollutant Capture, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    13. Arjan Van Timmeren & Jonna Zwetsloot & Han Brezet & Sacha Silvester, 2012. "Sustainable Urban Regeneration Based on Energy Balance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(7), pages 1-22, July.
    14. Eduardo Blanco & Maibritt Pedersen Zari & Kalina Raskin & Philippe Clergeau, 2021. "Urban Ecosystem-Level Biomimicry and Regenerative Design: Linking Ecosystem Functioning and Urban Built Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, January.
    15. Djamel Boussaa, 2017. "Urban Regeneration and the Search for Identity in Historic Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Xindong Du & Xiaoke Zhang & Huan Wang & Xiaojuan Zhi & Jianyuan Huang, 2020. "Assessing Green Space Potential Accessibility through Urban Artificial Building Data in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-11, November.
    17. Lorena F. Axinte & Abid Mehmood & Terry Marsden & Dirk Roep, 2019. "Regenerative city-regions: a new conceptual framework," Regional Studies, Regional Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 117-129, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edeltraud Haselsteiner & Blerta Vula Rizvanolli & Paola Villoria Sáez & Odysseas Kontovourkis, 2021. "Drivers and Barriers Leading to a Successful Paradigm Shift toward Regenerative Neighborhoods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Kaijian Li & Ruopeng Huang & Guiwen Liu & Asheem Shrestha & Xinyue Fu, 2022. "Social Capital in Neighbourhood Renewal: A Holistic and State of the Art Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, July.
    3. repec:eur:ejserj:622 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Aleksandra Nowysz & Łukasz Mazur & Magdalena Daria Vaverková & Eugeniusz Koda & Jan Winkler, 2022. "Urban Agriculture as an Alternative Source of Food and Water Security in Today’s Sustainable Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Justyna Przywojska, 2021. "Polish Local Government’s Perspective on Revitalisation: A Framework for Future Socially Sustainable Solutions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Angeliki Peponi & Paulo Morgado, 2020. "Transition to Smart and Regenerative Urban Places (SRUP): Contributions to a New Conceptual Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Coll-Barneto, Isabel & Fusté-Forné , Francesc, 2023. "Understanding Environmental Actions in Tourism Systems: Ecological Accommodations for a Regenerative Tourism Development," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 11(4), pages 239-253.
    8. Youngeun Kang & Keonhyeong Kim & Jeahyun Jung & Seungwoo Son & Eujin-Julia Kim, 2020. "How Vulnerable Are Urban Regeneration Sites to Climate Change in Busan, South Korea?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    9. Jiaxing Cui & Xuesong Kong & Jing Chen & Jianwei Sun & Yuanyuan Zhu, 2021. "Spatially Explicit Evaluation and Driving Factor Identification of Land Use Conflict in Yangtze River Economic Belt," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
    10. Seeram Ramakrishna & Wayne Hu & Rajan Jose, 2023. "Sustainability in Numbers by Data Analytics," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 643-655, June.
    11. Durán-Romero, Gemma & López, Ana M. & Beliaeva, Tatiana & Ferasso, Marcos & Garonne, Christophe & Jones, Paul, 2020. "Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    12. Marian Stuiver & Sabine O’Hara, 2021. "Food Connects Washington DC in 2050—A Vision for Urban Food Systems as the Centerpieces of a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Eunae Jin & Woojong Lee & Danya Kim, 2018. "Does Resident Participation in an Urban Regeneration Project Improve Neighborhood Satisfaction: A Case Study of “Amichojang” in Busan, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, October.
    14. Alessandro Pollini & Alessandro Caforio, 2021. "Participation and Iterative Experiments: Designing Alternative Futures with Migrants and Service Providers," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, September.
    15. Younghun Choi & Takuro Kobashi & Yoshiki Yamagata & Akito Murayama, 2021. "Assessment of waterfront office redevelopment plan on optimal building energy demand and rooftop photovoltaics for urban decarbonization," Papers 2108.09029, arXiv.org.
    16. Giorgio Mion & Angela Broglia & Angelo Bonfanti, 2019. "Do Codes of Ethics Reveal a University’s Commitment to Sustainable Development? Evidence from Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, February.
    17. Sultan Çetin & Catherine De Wolf & Nancy Bocken, 2021. "Circular Digital Built Environment: An Emerging Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-34, June.
    18. Ethan Gordon & Federico Davila & Chris Riedy, 2022. "Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(2), pages 809-826, June.
    19. Francesco De Luca, 2023. "Advances in Climatic Form Finding in Architecture and Urban Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Dennis Vegter & Jos van Hillegersberg & Matthias Olthaar, 2021. "Performance Measurement Systems for Circular Supply Chain Management: Current State of Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
    21. Ali Hainoun & Hans-Martin Neumann & Naomi Morishita-Steffen & Baptiste Mougeot & Étienne Vignali & Florian Mandel & Felix Hörmann & Sebastian Stortecky & Katharina Walter & Martin Kaltenhauser-Barth &, 2022. "Smarter Together: Monitoring and Evaluation of Integrated Building Solutions for Low-Energy Districts of Lighthouse Cities Lyon, Munich, and Vienna," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-26, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16715-:d:1002345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.