IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p16150-d992278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Culture-Led Regeneration of Industrial Brownfield Hosting Temporary Uses: A Post-Socialist Context–Case Study from Novi Sad, Serbia

Author

Listed:
  • Dejana Nedučin

    (Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 6, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Milena Krklješ

    (Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 6, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

Abstract

Utilizing culture as a tool for the regeneration of industrial brownfields represents a fairly new trend in post-socialist Europe. This topic has garnered some academic attention; however, studies primarily originate from EU member states, whereas the examples from non-EU cities remains largely unexplored. In addition, the literature dealing with the temporary creative use of derelict industrial sites in post-socialist cities is scarce. The case study-based paper contributes to filling these voids by investigating the creativity-driven informal activation of the Kineska Quarter in Novi Sad, the second largest city in Serbia and the European Capital of Culture for 2022, and its planned transformation into a creative district. The research aims are to examine the capacity of temporary uses to act as a hard infrastructure of the culture-led regeneration, identify the policy framework that shaped the project and highlight its shortcomings, detect potential sustainability issues, and examine how soft factors affect the use of hard infrastructure. The findings suggest that the redevelopment of a creative brownfield based on the simulation of bottom-up decision-making and hastily developed and blurry regeneration policies lead to uncertainty about its sustainability. They also suggest that post-socialist cities lacking experience in this field necessitate a context-perceptive, socially responsible, and locale-conscious approach to the (then sustainable) culture-led regeneration of spontaneously activated brownfields sites, which requires meaningful and not just pro forma involvement of non-institutional actors in the policy- and decision-making process.

Suggested Citation

  • Dejana Nedučin & Milena Krklješ, 2022. "Culture-Led Regeneration of Industrial Brownfield Hosting Temporary Uses: A Post-Socialist Context–Case Study from Novi Sad, Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16150-:d:992278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16150/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16150/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pier Luigi Sacco & Guido Ferilli & Giorgio Tavano Blessi & Massimiliano Nuccio, 2013. "Culture as an Engine of Local Development Processes: System-Wide Cultural Districts I: Theory," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 555-570, December.
    2. Yoonjee Baek & Changmu Jung & Heesun Joo, 2021. "Residents’ Perception of a Collaborative Approach with Artists in Culture-Led Urban Regeneration: A Case Study of the Changdong Art Village in Changwon City in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Sessa, Maria Rosaria & Russo, Alessio & Sica, Francesco, 2022. "Opinion paper on green deal for the urban regeneration of industrial brownfield land in Europe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Lauren Andres & Oleg Golubchikov, 2016. "The Limits to Artist-Led Regeneration: Creative Brownfields in the Cities of High Culture," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 757-775, July.
    5. Michael Martin & Iain Deas & Stephen Hincks, 2019. "The Role of Temporary Use in Urban Regeneration: Ordinary and Extraordinary Approaches in Bristol and Liverpool," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 537-557, October.
    6. Steven Miles & Ronan Paddison, 2005. "Introduction: The Rise and Rise of Culture-led Urban Regeneration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(5-6), pages 833-839, May.
    7. Jiahui Diao & Shaoming Lu, 2022. "The Culture-Oriented Urban Regeneration: Place Narrative in the Case of the Inner City of Haiyan (Zhejiang, China)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-23, June.
    8. Ema Alihodžić Jašarović & Svetlana Perović & Sanja Paunović Žarić, 2021. "Impacts of Arsenal Brownfield Regeneration on Urban Development of Tivat in Montenegro: From Industrial Settlement to Center of Nautical Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-34, July.
    9. Jin-Liao He & Hans Gebhardt, 2014. "Space of Creative Industries: A Case Study of Spatial Characteristics of Creative Clusters in Shanghai," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(11), pages 2351-2368, November.
    10. Alexandra-Camelia Marian-Potra & Ramona Ișfănescu-Ivan & Sorin Pavel & Cătălina Ancuța, 2020. "Temporary Uses of Urban Brownfields for Creative Activities in a Post-Socialist City. Case Study: Timișoara (Romania)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    11. Pier Luigi Sacco & Guido Ferilli & Giorgio Tavano Blessi & Massimiliano Nuccio, 2013. "Culture as an Engine of Local Development Processes: System-Wide Cultural Districts II: Prototype Cases," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 571-588, December.
    12. Bertaud, Alain & Renaud, Bertrand, 1995. "Cities without land markets : location and land use in the socialist city," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1477, The World Bank.
    13. Marco Acri & Saša Dobričić & Maja Debevec, 2021. "Regenerating the Historic Urban Landscape through Circular Bottom-Up Actions: The Urban Seeding Process in Rijeka," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-29, April.
    14. Luis Loures & Thomas Panagopoulos & Jon Bryan Burley, 2016. "Assessing user preferences on post-industrial redevelopment," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(5), pages 871-892, September.
    15. Georgiana Daniela Stoica & Violeta-Andreea Andreiana & Mircea Constantin Duica & Maria-Cristina Stefan & Irina Olimpia Susanu & Mihaela Denisa Coman & Dorin Iancu, 2022. "Perspectives for the Development of Sustainable Cultural Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, May.
    16. Christopher De Sousa, 2000. "Brownfield Redevelopment versus Greenfield Development: A Private Sector Perspective on the Costs and Risks Associated with Brownfield Redevelopment in the Greater Toronto Area," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(6), pages 831-853.
    17. Xabier Gainza, 2018. "Industrial spaces for grassroots creative production: spatial, social and planning facets," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 792-811, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pierluigi Sacco & Guido Ferilli & Giorgio Tavano Blessi, 2014. "Understanding culture-led local development: A critique of alternative theoretical explanations," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(13), pages 2806-2821, October.
    2. Ezio Micelli & Francesco Campagnari & Luca Lazzarini & Elena Ostanel & Naomi Pedri Stocco, 2024. "They Like to Do It in Public: A Quantitative Analysis of Culture-Led Regeneration Projects in ITALY," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Viola Fabi & Maria Pilar Vettori & Emilio Faroldi, 2021. "Adaptive Reuse Practices and Sustainable Urban Development: Perspectives of Innovation for European Historic Spa Towns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    4. Sunday Oladipo Oladeji & Oyeniran Grace & Akeju Ayobami Ayodeji, 2022. "Community Participation in Conservation and Management of Cultural Heritage Resources in Yoruba Ethnic Group of South Western Nigeria," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    5. Buscema, Massimo & Ferilli, Guido & Gustafsson, Christer & Massini, Giulia & Sacco, Pier Luigi, 2022. "A nonlinear, data-driven, ANNs-based approach to culture-led development policies in rural areas: The case of Gjakove and Peć districts, Western Kosovo," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    6. Pier Luigi Sacco & Guido Ferilli & Giorgio Tavano Blessi, 2018. "From Culture 1.0 to Culture 3.0: Three Socio-Technical Regimes of Social and Economic Value Creation through Culture, and Their Impact on European Cohesion Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-23, October.
    7. Naveed Ahmad & Yuming Zhu & Muhammad Ibrahim & Muhammad Waqas & Abdul Waheed, 2018. "Development of a Standard Brownfield Definition, Guidelines, and Evaluation Index System for Brownfield Redevelopment in Developing Countries: The Case of Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, November.
    8. Serena Viola, 2022. "Built Heritage Repurposing and Communities Engagement: Symbiosis, Enabling Processes, Key Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Corina TURȘIE & Thomas PERRIN, 2020. "Assessing the social and cultural impacts of the European Capital of Culture programme in cross-border regions. A research agenda," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 11, pages 77-98, November.
    10. Aura Bertoni & Paola Dubini & Alberto Monti, 2021. "Bringing Back in the Spatial Dimension in the Assessment of Cultural and Creative Industries and Its Relationship with a City’s Sustainability: The Case of Milan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    11. Maria Della Lucia, 2014. "La multidimensionalit? dello sviluppo locale culture-led. laboratori territoriali di sperimentazione," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(4), pages 85-107.
    12. Guido Ferilli & Pier Luigi Sacco & Massimo Buscema & Giorgio Tavano Blessi, 2015. "Understanding Cultural Geography as a Pseudo-Diffusion Process: The Case of the Veneto Region," Economies, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-28, June.
    13. Paolo Massimo Buscema & Guido Ferilli & Christer Gustafsson & Pier Luigi Sacco, 2020. "The Complex Dynamic Evolution of Cultural Vibrancy in the Region of Halland, Sweden," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 43(3), pages 159-202, May.
    14. Alexandra-Camelia Marian-Potra & Ramona Ișfănescu-Ivan & Sorin Pavel & Cătălina Ancuța, 2020. "Temporary Uses of Urban Brownfields for Creative Activities in a Post-Socialist City. Case Study: Timișoara (Romania)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    15. Christer Gustafsson & Elisabetta Lazzaro, 2021. "The Innovative Response of Cultural and Creative Industries to Major European Societal Challenges: Toward a Knowledge and Competence Base," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, November.
    16. Xosé Somoza Medina & Carlos Emilio Relea Fernández, 2024. "Culture as a Resilient and Sustainable Strategy in Small Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, September.
    17. Robin A. Chang, 2021. "How Do Scholars Communicate the ‘Temporary Turn’ in Urban Studies? A Socio-Semiotic Framework," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 133-145.
    18. James J Gregory, 2016. "Creative industries and urban regeneration – The Maboneng precinct, Johannesburg," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 31(1-2), pages 158-171, February.
    19. Drupp, Moritz A. & Baumgärtner, Stefan & Meyer, Moritz & Quaas, Martin F. & von Wehrden, Henrik, 2020. "Between Ostrom and Nordhaus: The research landscape of sustainability economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    20. Neill Marshall & Stuart Dawley & Andy Pike & Jane Pollard, 2018. "Geographies of corporate philanthropy: The Northern Rock Foundation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(2), pages 266-287, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16150-:d:992278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.