IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p15972-d988894.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Automotive Electrification Challenges Shown by Real-World Driving Data and Lifecycle Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Neidhardt

    (Mercedes-Benz AG, Bela-Barenyi-Straße, 71059 Sindelfingen, Germany
    Chair of Electric Mobility and Energy Storage Systems, University of Wuppertal, Rainer-Gruenter-Str. 21, 42119 Wuppertal, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jordi Mas-Peiro

    (Mercedes-Benz AG, Bela-Barenyi-Straße, 71059 Sindelfingen, Germany
    Chemical Engineering and Material Science Department, IQS School of Engineering, Universitat Ramon Llull, Via Augusta 390, 08017 Barcelona, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Antonia Schneck

    (Mercedes-Benz AG, Bela-Barenyi-Straße, 71059 Sindelfingen, Germany)

  • Josep O. Pou

    (Chemical Engineering and Material Science Department, IQS School of Engineering, Universitat Ramon Llull, Via Augusta 390, 08017 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Rafael Gonzalez-Olmos

    (Chemical Engineering and Material Science Department, IQS School of Engineering, Universitat Ramon Llull, Via Augusta 390, 08017 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Arno Kwade

    (Institute for Particle Technology, University of Braunschweig, Volkmaroder Str. 5, 38104 Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Benedikt Schmuelling

    (Chair of Electric Mobility and Energy Storage Systems, University of Wuppertal, Rainer-Gruenter-Str. 21, 42119 Wuppertal, Germany)

Abstract

Electric mobility is considered a solution to reduce carbon emissions. We expanded a lifecycle assessment with data on technical limitations and driving habits (based on real-world data) in order to identify the environmentally optimal drivetrain for each individual driving behavior with current and projected technologies, focusing on CO 2 emissions. By combining all data, an environmentally optimal European drivetrain mix is calculated, which is dominated by fuel-cell electric vehicles (50% in 2020, 47% in 2030), followed by plug-in hybrid-electric vehicles (37%, 40%), battery-electric vehicles (BEV) (5%, 12%), and Diesel vehicles (2%, 1%). Driving behavior defines the most environmental drivetrain and the coexistence of different drivetrains is currently still necessary. Such information is crucial to identify limitations and unmet technological needs for full electrification. If range is not considered a limitation, the environmentally optimal drivetrain mix is dominated by BEVs (71%, 75%), followed by fuel cell electric vehicles (25%, 19%) and plug-in electric vehicles (4%, 6%). This confirms the potential environmental benefits of BEVs for current and future transportation. Developments in battery energy density, charging, and sustainable production, as well as a change in driving behavior, will be crucial to make BEVs the environmentally optimal drivetrain choice.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Neidhardt & Jordi Mas-Peiro & Antonia Schneck & Josep O. Pou & Rafael Gonzalez-Olmos & Arno Kwade & Benedikt Schmuelling, 2022. "Automotive Electrification Challenges Shown by Real-World Driving Data and Lifecycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15972-:d:988894
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15972/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15972/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joon Moon & Young Joo Kim & Taesu Cheong & Sang Hwa Song, 2020. "Locating Battery Swapping Stations for a Smart e-Bus System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Binbin Sun & Tianqi Gu & Mengxue Xie & Pengwei Wang & Song Gao & Xi Zhang, 2022. "Strategy Design and Performance Analysis of an Electromechanical Flywheel Hybrid Scheme for Electric Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Christoph Buchal & Hans-Dieter Karl & Hans-Werner Sinn, 2019. "Kohlemotoren, Windmotoren und Dieselmotoren: Was zeigt die CO2-Bilanz?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(08), pages 40-54, April.
    4. Kamilė Petrauskienė & Arvydas Galinis & Daina Kliaugaitė & Jolanta Dvarionienė, 2021. "Comparative Environmental Life Cycle and Cost Assessment of Electric, Hybrid, and Conventional Vehicles in Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Woongchul Choi, 2020. "A Study on State of Charge and State of Health Estimation in Consideration of Lithium-Ion Battery Aging," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Sacchi, R. & Bauer, C. & Cox, B. & Mutel, C., 2022. "When, where and how can the electrification of passenger cars reduce greenhouse gas emissions?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    7. Mario Martín-Gamboa & Paula Quinteiro & Ana Cláudia Dias & Diego Iribarren, 2021. "Comparative Social Life Cycle Assessment of Two Biomass-to-Electricity Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Archsmith, James & Kendall, Alissa & Rapson, David, 2015. "From Cradle to Junkyard: Assessing the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Benefits of Electric Vehicles," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 72-90.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adrian Irimescu & Bianca Maria Vaglieco & Simona Silvia Merola & Vasco Zollo & Raffaele De Marinis, 2023. "Conversion of a Small-Size Passenger Car to Hydrogen Fueling: Evaluating the Risk of Backfire and the Correlation to Fuel System Requirements through 0D/1D Simulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Sheldon, Tamara L. & Dua, Rubal, 2018. "Gasoline savings from clean vehicle adoption," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 418-424.
    3. Wifo, 2021. "WIFO-Monatsberichte, Heft 11/2021," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 94(11), November.
    4. Burlig, Fiona PhD & Bushnell, James PhD & Rapson, David PhD & Wolfram, Catherine PhD, 2020. "Supercharged? Electricity Demand and the Electrification of Transportation in California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt9t62s2sd, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    5. Georgios Archimidis Tsalidis & Maria Batsioula & George F. Banias & Evina Katsou, 2024. "A Review Analysis of Electricity Generation Studies with Social Life Cycle Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-13, June.
    6. Nenming Wang & Guwen Tang, 2022. "A Review on Environmental Efficiency Evaluation of New Energy Vehicles Using Life Cycle Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-35, March.
    7. Noel, Lance & Papu Carrone, Andrea & Jensen, Anders Fjendbo & Zarazua de Rubens, Gerardo & Kester, Johannes & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2019. "Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and vehicle-to-grid applications: A Nordic choice experiment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 525-534.
    8. Jin Li & Feng Wang & Yu He, 2020. "Electric Vehicle Routing Problem with Battery Swapping Considering Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Meunier, Guy & Ponssard, Jean-Pierre, 2020. "Optimal policy and network effects for the deployment of zero emission vehicles," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    10. Stephen P. Holland & Erin T. Mansur & Nicholas Z. Muller & Andrew J. Yates, 2016. "Are There Environmental Benefits from Driving Electric Vehicles? The Importance of Local Factors," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(12), pages 3700-3729, December.
    11. Roberto Amaral-Santos & Ariaster Chimeli & Joao Paulo Pessoa, 2023. "Natural Gas Vehicles: Consequences to Fuel Markets and the Environment," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2023_07, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    12. Stephen P. Holland & Erin T. Mansur & Nicholas Z. Muller & Andrew J. Yates, 2019. "Distributional Effects of Air Pollution from Electric Vehicle Adoption," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(S1), pages 65-94.
    13. Tamara L. Sheldon & Rubal Dua & Omar Abdullah Alharbib, 2023. "How Cost-effective are Electric Vehicle Subsidies in Reducing Tailpipe-CO2 Emissions? An Analysis of Major Electric Vehicle Markets," The Energy Journal, , vol. 44(3), pages 223-250, May.
    14. Fournel, Jean-François, 2023. "Electric Vehicle Subsidies: Cost-Effectiveness and Emission Reductions," TSE Working Papers 23-1465, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    15. Pessoa, Joao Paulo & Santos, Roberto Amaral & Chimeli, Ariaster, 2023. "Natural Gas Vehicles: Consequences to Fuel Markets and the Environment," SocArXiv 7tvgy, Center for Open Science.
    16. Maxwell Woody & Michael T. Craig & Parth T. Vaishnav & Geoffrey M. Lewis & Gregory A. Keoleian, 2022. "Optimizing future cost and emissions of electric delivery vehicles," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 1108-1122, June.
    17. Zunian Luo, 2022. "Powering Up a Slow Charging Market: How Do Government Subsidies Affect Charging Station Supply?," Papers 2210.14908, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.
    18. Lázaro V. Cremades & Lluc Canals Casals, 2022. "Analysis of the Future of Mobility: The Battery Electric Vehicle Seems Just a Transitory Alternative," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-12, December.
    19. Manjunath, Archana & Gross, George, 2017. "Towards a meaningful metric for the quantification of GHG emissions of electric vehicles (EVs)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 423-429.
    20. Ambrose, Hanjiro, 2019. "Environmental and economic costs, benefits and uncertainties of vehicle electrification: a life cycle approach," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt3bx6f16d, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15972-:d:988894. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.