IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p15239-d975176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Construction Dispute Potentials: Mechanism versus Empiricism in Artificial Neural Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Peipei Wang

    (School of Civil and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222000, China)

  • Yunhan Huang

    (School of Civil and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222000, China)

  • Jianguo Zhu

    (School of Civil and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222000, China)

  • Ming Shan

    (School of Civil and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222000, China)

Abstract

The booming development of neural network algorithms has shifted the research focus in the field of construction project management from causal investigation to statistical approximation and hence from mechanistic models to empirical models. This paper took construction dispute avoidance as an example and enabled the best efforts to establish paired mechanistic and empirical models to investigate if the pursuit of a mechanistic understanding of construction disputes should be continued. A Bayesian belief network and multilayer perceptron were used for mechanistic and empirical simulations, respectively. A list of critical dispute factors was first identified from the literature and shortlisted by Pearson’s chi-square tests and Pearson product-moment correlational coefficient tests. The structure of the Bayesian belief network was constructed with logical deduction assisted by a further literature review and Delphi surveys. A structured questionnaire survey was conducted to collect quantitative data for factor shortlisting and model quantification. It was revealed that, being assisted with machine learning techniques, both mechanistic and empirical models achieved an accuracy rate of over 95% under ideal conditions. However, Bayesian belief network models predicted better with fewer constraints due to their advantages in reflecting the formation mechanism of construction disputes, while multilayer perceptron models were more constrained by the inconvenience of sourcing high-quality data as model input. This paper demonstrated that it is still necessary to investigate the formation mechanism of construction disputes further for more efficient avoidance strategies. During the investigation of model construction and comparison, this paper also reflected on the interpretation of statistical threshold and proposed that an arbitrary single cut-off point for statistical tests could potentially eliminate factors that should have been included.

Suggested Citation

  • Peipei Wang & Yunhan Huang & Jianguo Zhu & Ming Shan, 2022. "Construction Dispute Potentials: Mechanism versus Empiricism in Artificial Neural Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15239-:d:975176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15239/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15239/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thaveeporn Pulket & David Arditi, 2009. "Construction litigation prediction system using ant colony optimization," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 241-251.
    2. Riaz Ahmed & Noor Mohamad & Muhammad Ahmad, 2016. "Effect of multidimensional top management support on project success: an empirical investigation," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 151-176, January.
    3. Michael Behm & Arthur Schneller, 2013. "Application of the Loughborough Construction Accident Causation model: a framework for organizational learning," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 580-595, June.
    4. Usman Ismaila & Wooyong Jung & Chan Young Park, 2022. "Delay Causes and Types in Nigerian Power Construction Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Faham Tahmasebinia & Vicheth Song, 2022. "Significant Factors Causing Delay in the Cambodian Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    6. Elikplim Afelete & Wooyong Jung, 2021. "Causes of Design Change Depending on Power Project-Types in Ghana," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Bauma Frigeant Bitamba & Sung-Hoon An, 2020. "Construction Project Change Management in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: Status, Causes, and Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Marion M. Russell & Min Liu & Simon M. Hsiang, 2015. "Planning for uncertainty: use of structural equation modelling to determine the causal structure of time buffer allocation," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(10), pages 783-798, October.
    9. Ismail Abdul Rahman & Abdulla Eisaa Saleh Al Ameri & Aftab Hameed Memon & Nashwan Al-Emad & Ahmed S. A. Marey Alhammadi, 2022. "Structural Relationship of Causes and Effects of Construction Changes: Case of UAE Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-14, January.
    10. Ramin Ansari & Mohammad Khalilzadeh & Roohollah Taherkhani & Jurgita Antucheviciene & Darius Migilinskas & Shohreh Moradi, 2022. "Performance Prediction of Construction Projects Based on the Causes of Claims: A System Dynamics Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maryam Hussain Abal-Seqan & Shaligram Pokharel & Khalid Kamal Naji, 2023. "Key Success Factors and Their Impact on the Performance of Construction Projects: Case in Qatar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Muhammad Zeeshan Fareed & Qin Su, 2022. "Project Governance and Project Performance: The Moderating Role of Top Management Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Yikun Su & Shijing Yang & Kangning Liu & Kaicheng Hua & Qi Yao, 2019. "Developing A Case-Based Reasoning Model for Safety Accident Pre-Control and Decision Making in the Construction Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Mudassar Ali & Li Zhang & Zhenduo Zhang & Muhammad Zada & Abida Begum & Heesup Han & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz, 2021. "Can Leaders’ Humility Enhance Project Management Effectiveness? Interactive Effect of Top Management Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Albert P. C. Chan & Yang Yang & Tracy N. Y. Choi & Janet Mayowa Nwaogu, 2022. "Characteristics and Causes of Construction Accidents in a Large-Scale Development Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, April.
    6. Pouya Gholizadeh & Behzad Esmaeili, 2020. "Developing a Multi-variate Logistic Regression Model to Analyze Accident Scenarios: Case of Electrical Contractors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-24, July.
    7. Cetinkaya, Ali Sukru & Rashid, Muhammad, 2018. "The Effect of Social Media on Employees’ Job Performance: The mediating Role of Organizational Structure," MPRA Paper 91354, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Oct 2018.
    8. Muhammad Zeeshan Fareed & Qin Su & Najam Abbas Naqvi & Rida Batool & Muhammad Umer Aslam, 2023. "Transformational Leadership and Project Success: The Moderating Effect of Top Management Support," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    9. Nuria Gamero & Inmaculada Silla & Rubén Sainz-González & Beatriz Sora, 2018. "The Influence of Organizational Factors on Road Transport Safety," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-8, September.
    10. Noori Adel, 2023. "Assessment of interorganisational conflict in building refurbishment projects using EFA and PLS-SEM," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 178-191, January.
    11. Dimitrios Dimitriou & Konstantinos Papakostas, 2022. "Review of Management Comprehensiveness on Occupational Health and Safety for PPP Transportation Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Olakunle Jayeola & Shafie Sidek & Zulkiflee Abdul-Samad & Nornajihah Nadia Hasbullah & Saiful Anwar & Nguyen Binh An & Vu Thi Nga & Omar Al-Kasasbeh & Samrat Ray, 2022. "The Mediating and Moderating Effects of Top Management Support on the Cloud ERP Implementation–Financial Performance Relationship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15239-:d:975176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.