IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p15209-d974570.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Respondent Dynamic Attention to Streetscape Composition in Nanjing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhi Yue

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, #159 Longpan Road, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Ying Zhong

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, #159 Longpan Road, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Zhouxiao Cui

    (Highway Development Center, Jiangsu Provincial Department of Transportation, #69 Shigu Road, Nanjing 210037, China)

Abstract

Scholars are interested in understanding human responses and perceptions concerning the configuration of streetscape environments that serve multiple functions. However, drivers’ visual attention to the streetscape has seldom been studied dynamically in multi-modal settings. By employing eye-tracking and semantic segmentation, visual attention partitions and objects and patterns are inspected in a per-second count along three typical roadways in Nanjing, China. In our study of 28 participants, it was found that people are likely to focus on the frame center ( p -value < 0.005) in all methods of transportation. Roads and buildings are constantly observed along the roadway ( p -value < 0.005), while smaller transportation objects across multi-modal conditions are noticed more in per-area counts ( p -value < 0.025). Besides, vehicles are focused on more in a higher-speed driving lane ( p -values < 0.005), while greenery and humans attract more attention in a slower lane ( p -values < 0.005). The results indicate that the previous visual engagement results should be reconsidered on several points, and that the risk of distractions from non-traffic-related elements could be overestimated. The potential of the road surface in integrating safety and information-providing has been ignored in current studies. This study showed that greenery and other functional elements will not distract users in driving lanes; decreasing the calculation burden to two-ninth is possible in smart driving. These results could be helpful in future sustainable cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhi Yue & Ying Zhong & Zhouxiao Cui, 2022. "Respondent Dynamic Attention to Streetscape Composition in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15209-:d:974570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15209/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15209/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Säumel, Ina & Weber, Frauke & Kowarik, Ingo, 2016. "Toward livable and healthy urban streets: Roadside vegetation provides ecosystem services where people live and move," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 24-33.
    2. James Simpson & Megan Freeth & Kimberley J. Simpson & Kevin Thwaites, 2019. "Visual engagement with urban street edges: insights using mobile eye-tracking," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 259-278, July.
    3. Alisha Siebold & Wieske van Zoest & Mieke Donk, 2011. "Oculomotor Evidence for Top-Down Control following the Initial Saccade," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-10, September.
    4. Tian Gao & Ling Zhu & Tian Zhang & Rui Song & Yuanqun Zhang & Ling Qiu, 2019. "Is an Environment with High Biodiversity the Most Attractive for Human Recreation? A Case Study in Baoji, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Ajjima Soathong & Douglas Wilson & Prakash Ranjitkar & Subeh Chowdhury, 2019. "A Critical Review of Policies on Pedestrian Safety and a Case Study of New Zealand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-27, September.
    6. James Simpson & Kevin Thwaites & Megan Freeth, 2019. "Understanding Visual Engagement with Urban Street Edges along Non-Pedestrianised and Pedestrianised Streets Using Mobile Eye-Tracking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Theo Bodin & Jonas Björk & Jonas Ardö & Maria Albin, 2015. "Annoyance, Sleep and Concentration Problems due to Combined Traffic Noise and the Benefit of Quiet Side," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    8. Fruth, Erik & Kvistad, Michele & Marshall, Joe & Pfeifer, Lena & Rau, Luisa & Sagebiel, Julian & Soto, Daniel & Tarpey, John & Weir, Jessica & Winiarski, Bradyn, 2019. "Economic valuation of street-level urban greening: A case study from an evolving mixed-use area in Berlin," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhaocheng Bai & Rui Ji & Jun Qi, 2024. "Deciphering Motorists’ Perceptions of Scenic Road Visual Landscapes: Integrating Binocular Simulation and Image Segmentation," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nawaf Saeed Al Mushayt & Francesca Dal Cin & Sérgio Barreiros Proença, 2021. "New Lens to Reveal the Street Interface. A Morphological-Visual Perception Methodological Contribution for Decoding the Public/Private Edge of Arterial Streets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Xianing Wang & Zhan Zhang & Ying Wang & Jun Yang & Linjun Lu, 2022. "A Study on Safety Evaluation of Pedestrian Flows Based on Partial Impact Dynamics by Real-Time Data in Subway Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Amber L. Pearson & Victoria Breeze & Aaron Reuben & Gwen Wyatt, 2021. "Increased Use of Porch or Backyard Nature during COVID-19 Associated with Lower Stress and Better Symptom Experience among Breast Cancer Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Carter, Virginia & Derudder, Ben & Henríquez, Cristián, 2021. "Assessing local governments’ perception of the potential implementation of biophilic urbanism in Chile: A latent class approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    5. Eggimann, Sven, 2022. "Expanding urban green space with superblocks," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    6. Angel M. Dzhambov & Iana Markevych & Boris Tilov & Zlatoslav Arabadzhiev & Drozdstoj Stoyanov & Penka Gatseva & Donka D. Dimitrova, 2018. "Lower Noise Annoyance Associated with GIS-Derived Greenspace: Pathways through Perceived Greenspace and Residential Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, July.
    7. Ling Qiu & Qujing Chen & Tian Gao, 2021. "The Effects of Urban Natural Environments on Preference and Self-Reported Psychological Restoration of the Elderly," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-14, January.
    8. Pia Wackler & Sonja Bauer, 2024. "Potentials for Optimizing Roadside Greenery to Improve the Quality of Life in Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Jorge H. Amorim & Magnuz Engardt & Christer Johansson & Isabel Ribeiro & Magnus Sannebro, 2021. "Regulating and Cultural Ecosystem Services of Urban Green Infrastructure in the Nordic Countries: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Kayvan Aghabayk & Alireza Soltani & Nirajan Shiwakoti, 2022. "Investigating Pedestrians’ Exit Choice with Incident Location Awareness in an Emergency in a Multi-Level Shopping Complex," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, September.
    11. Stéphane Perron & Céline Plante & Martina S. Ragettli & David J. Kaiser & Sophie Goudreau & Audrey Smargiassi, 2016. "Sleep Disturbance from Road Traffic, Railways, Airplanes and from Total Environmental Noise Levels in Montreal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, August.
    12. Mingyu Hou & Jianchuan Cheng, 2021. "The Role of Social Networks in Mobile Phone Use among Pedestrians: A Pilot Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, January.
    13. Giuseppe Salvia & Irene Pluchinotta & Ioanna Tsoulou & Gemma Moore & Nici Zimmermann, 2022. "Understanding Urban Green Space Usage through Systems Thinking: A Case Study in Thamesmead, London," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, February.
    14. Marcin Budzynski & Anna Gobis & Lucyna Guminska & Lukasz Jelinski & Mariusz Kiec & Piotr Tomczuk, 2021. "Assessment of the Influence of Road Infrastructure Parameters on the Behaviour of Drivers and Pedestrians in Pedestrian Crossing Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    15. James Simpson & Kevin Thwaites & Megan Freeth, 2019. "Understanding Visual Engagement with Urban Street Edges along Non-Pedestrianised and Pedestrianised Streets Using Mobile Eye-Tracking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Gabriel Kuczman & Denis Bechera & Zdenka Rózová & Attila Tóth, 2024. "Roadside Vegetation Functions, Woody Plant Values, and Ecosystem Services in Rural Streetscapes: A Qualitative Study on Rural Settlements in Western Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, February.
    17. Irene van Kamp & Sendrick Simon & Hilary Notley & Christos Baliatsas & Elise van Kempen, 2020. "Evidence Relating to Environmental Noise Exposure and Annoyance, Sleep Disturbance, Cardio-Vascular and Metabolic Health Outcomes in the Context of IGCB (N): A Scoping Review of New Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-21, April.
    18. Agarwal, Ankit & Canfield, Casey & Fikru, Mahelet G., 2024. "Role of greener default options on consumer preferences for renewable energy procurement," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    19. Xiaohuan Xie & Hanzhi Zhou & Zhonghua Gou & Ming Yi, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Patterns of the Use of Green Space by White-Collar Workers in Chinese Cities: A Study in Shenzhen," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, September.
    20. James Simpson & Megan Freeth & Kimberley Jayne Simpson & Kevin Thwaites, 2022. "Street edge subdivision: Structuring ground floor interfaces to stimulate pedestrian visual engagement," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(6), pages 1775-1791, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15209-:d:974570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.