IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14623-d965448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characteristics of Land Use Change in China before and after 2000

Author

Listed:
  • Zijuan Zhu

    (Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Zengxiang Zhang

    (Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China)

  • Xiaoli Zhao

    (Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China)

  • Lijun Zuo

    (Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China)

  • Xiao Wang

    (Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China)

Abstract

China, with notable population blooming and economic development in the last decades, has experienced profound land-use changes, which, in turn, dramatically impacted the regional, even global and environment system. However, characteristics of land-use changes in China have not yet been well addressed, especially around the year 2000 when a series of land policies were put forward, such as the project of “returning farmland to forest”. To fill this gap, this paper investigated the temporal and spatial patterns of land use changes in China for the period from 1987 to 2010, by taking advantage of the continually updated China Land Use Database developed from remote sensing images. The land-use dynamic matrix, zonal model, and transition matrix were employed to characterize land-use change patterns for four time intervals (1987–1995, 1995–2000, 2000–2005, and 2005–2010) on the dimensions of conversion and modification. Results showed that land-use change affected 4 × 10 5 km 2 (4.5%) of the total landscape in China for more than the past twenty years. Of the six land-use types, built-up land experienced the largest net increase by almost 30% (52,434 km 2 ), with the rate of expansion accelerating after 1995. The area of cropland increased before 2000 and declined afterwards, ending with a net increase in 14,280 km 2 , approximately 1% of its original area. The loss in the eastern coastal region is attributed mainly to built-up land expansion, while the gain in northern China, with the price of grassland and woodland shrinking, reshaped the cropland distribution in China. The area of woodland decreased slightly by 7880 km 2 without a clear pattern over time. The modification of woodland indicated an intensive forest management in terms of planting fast-growing trees in the south of China. Grassland continues to shrink at a decreasing rate, and the modification of grassland shows a tendency of transformation from sparse grassland into a dense one in the 21st century. Trade-offs among demands on food security, economic development, and environment protection forced and shaped the contemporary land-use change in China. These results contribute to understanding the trends and causes of land use change in China, which could provide underpinning knowledge for assessing environmental change, and provide insights on future land planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Zijuan Zhu & Zengxiang Zhang & Xiaoli Zhao & Lijun Zuo & Xiao Wang, 2022. "Characteristics of Land Use Change in China before and after 2000," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14623-:d:965448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14623/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14623/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kun Zhou & Xinyi Wang & Zhihan Wang & Yecui Hu, 2022. "Systematicity and Stability Analysis of Land Use Change—Taking Jinan, China, as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Tian, Guangjin & Jiang, Jing & Yang, Zhifeng & Zhang, Yaoqi, 2011. "The urban growth, size distribution and spatio-temporal dynamic pattern of the Yangtze River Delta megalopolitan region, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 865-878.
    3. A. S. MacDougall & K. S. McCann & G. Gellner & R. Turkington, 2013. "Diversity loss with persistent human disturbance increases vulnerability to ecosystem collapse," Nature, Nature, vol. 494(7435), pages 86-89, February.
    4. Stehfest, Elke & Heistermann, Maik & Priess, Joerg A. & Ojima, Dennis S. & Alcamo, Joseph, 2007. "Simulation of global crop production with the ecosystem model DayCent," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 209(2), pages 203-219.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Qifei & Wang, Meng, 2022. "Opening of high-speed rail and the consumer service industry: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 31-45.
    2. Weizhong Su & Gaobin Ye, 2014. "Differences of Soil Fertility in Farmland Occupation and Supplement Areas in the Taihu Lake Watershed during 1985–2010," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Jie Song & Dongyan Cai & Jinsong Deng & Ke Wang & Zhangquan Shen, 2015. "Dynamics of Paddy Field Patterns in Response to Urbanization: A Case Study of the Hang-Jia-Hu Plain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Han, Yu & Jia, Haifeng, 2017. "Simulating the spatial dynamics of urban growth with an integrated modeling approach: A case study of Foshan, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 353(C), pages 107-116.
    5. Jianhui Dong & Wenju Yun & Kening Wu & Shaoshuai Li & Bingrui Liu & Qiaoyuan Lu, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Cultivated Land from 2010 to 2020 in Long’an County, Karst Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Shao, Shuai & Tian, Zhihua & Yang, Lili, 2017. "High speed rail and urban service industry agglomeration: Evidence from China's Yangtze River Delta region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 174-183.
    7. Yang, Jia & Ren, Wei & Ouyang, Ying & Feng, Gary & Tao, Bo & Granger, Joshua J. & Poudel, Krishna P., 2019. "Projection of 21st century irrigation water requirement across the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 60-72.
    8. Fritz, Steffen & See, Linda & Bayas, Juan Carlos Laso & Waldner, François & Jacques, Damien & Becker-Reshef, Inbal & Whitcraft, Alyssa & Baruth, Bettina & Bonifacio, Rogerio & Crutchfield, Jim & Rembo, 2019. "A comparison of global agricultural monitoring systems and current gaps," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 258-272.
    9. Luoman Pu & Shuwen Zhang & Jiuchun Yang & Liping Chang & Shuting Bai, 2019. "Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Maize Potential Yield and Yield Gaps in Northeast China from 1990 to 2015," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Wang, Feng & Wei, Xianjin & Liu, Juan & He, Lingyun & Gao, Mengnan, 2019. "Impact of high-speed rail on population mobility and urbanisation: A case study on Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 99-114.
    11. Cheng, Kun & Ogle, Stephen M. & Parton, William J. & Pan, Genxing, 2013. "Predicting methanogenesis from rice paddies using the DAYCENT ecosystem model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 261, pages 19-31.
    12. Guoqing Cui & Wenlong Zheng & Siliang Chen & Yue Dong & Tingyu Huang, 2022. "Study on the Spatial Pattern Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Inefficient Urban Land Use in the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.
    13. Ortiz-Bobea, Ariel & Kim, Do-Hyung & Chen, Yanyou, "undated". "Identifying climatic constraints of US agriculture," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170674, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Peckett, Frances J. & Glegg, Gillian A. & Rodwell, Lynda D., 2014. "Assessing the quality of data required to identify effective marine protected areas," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 333-341.
    15. Pedro Daleo & Juan Alberti & Enrique J. Chaneton & Oscar Iribarne & Pedro M. Tognetti & Jonathan D. Bakker & Elizabeth T. Borer & Martín Bruschetti & Andrew S. MacDougall & Jesús Pascual & Mahesh Sank, 2023. "Environmental heterogeneity modulates the effect of plant diversity on the spatial variability of grassland biomass," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    16. Siyu Miao & Yang Xiao & Ling Tang, 2022. "Urban Growth Simulation Based on a Multi-Dimension Classification of Growth Types: Implications for China’s Territory Spatial Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Yane Freitas Silva & Rafael Vasconcelos Valadares & Henrique Boriolo Dias & Santiago Vianna Cuadra & Eleanor E. Campbell & Rubens A. C. Lamparelli & Edemar Moro & Rafael Battisti & Marcelo R. Alves & , 2022. "Intense Pasture Management in Brazil in an Integrated Crop-Livestock System Simulated by the DayCent Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    18. Wenyi Qiao & Weihua Guan & Xianjin Huang, 2021. "Assessing the Potential Impact of Land Use on Carbon Storage Driven by Economic Growth: A Case Study in Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Hongdan Li & Wenjiao Shi & Bing Wang & Tingting An & Shuang Li & Shuangyi Li & Jingkuan Wang, 2017. "Comparison of the modeled potential yield versus the actual yield of maize in Northeast China and the implications for national food security," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(1), pages 99-114, February.
    20. Zhifeng Zhang & Yuping Tang & Hongyi Pan & Caiyi Yao & Tianyi Zhang, 2022. "Assessment of the Ecological Protection Effectiveness of Protected Areas Using Propensity Score Matching: A Case Study in Sichuan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-15, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14623-:d:965448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.