IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14383-d961846.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Acceptance of Last-Mile Shuttle Bus Services with Automation and Electrification in Cold-Climate Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Naihui Wang

    (School of Traffic and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Yulong Pei

    (School of Traffic and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Hao Fu

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

The last-mile shuttle bus service with automation and electrification has emerged to fill gaps in on-demand transportation systems and its goals are to satisfy the door-to-door mobility needs of residents. It could help to enhance the happiness of public travel in cold-climate environments, which is also considered a pro-social public transportation service. Although it has the potential to promote sustainable and environmentally friendly mobility systems, the successful implementation of last-mile shuttle bus services with automation and electrification highly depends on individuals’ willingness to accept. In this paper, a theoretical acceptance model for last-mile shuttle bus services with automation and electrification is proposed. Partial least squares structural equation modeling is employed to examine research model in accordance with 986 valid questionnaires answered by public in snow and ice environments. The outcomes show that the proposed model accounts for 73.4% of the variance in behavioral intention to utilize last-mile shuttle bus services with automation and electrification. The strongest determinants of behavior intention are attitude and perceived usefulness. In addition, perceived risk negatively affects behavioral intention. We also provide theoretical findings and practical suggestions for developing last-mile shuttle bus services with automation and electrification based on the results and our analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Naihui Wang & Yulong Pei & Hao Fu, 2022. "Public Acceptance of Last-Mile Shuttle Bus Services with Automation and Electrification in Cold-Climate Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14383-:d:961846
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14383/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14383/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jansuwan, Sarawut & Liu, Zhaocai & Song, Ziqi & Chen, Anthony, 2021. "An evaluation framework of automated electric transportation system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    2. Onwezen, Marleen C. & Antonides, Gerrit & Bartels, Jos, 2013. "The Norm Activation Model: An exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behaviour," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 141-153.
    3. Yuwei Liu & Hong Sheng & Norbert Mundorf & Colleen Redding & Yinjiao Ye, 2017. "Integrating Norm Activation Model and Theory of Planned Behavior to Understand Sustainable Transport Behavior: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Junze Wang & Sheng Zhao & Wei Zhang & Richard Evans, 2021. "Why people adopt smart transportation services: an integrated model of TAM, trust and perceived risk," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(6), pages 629-646, August.
    5. Chen, Yiwei & Wang, Hai, 2018. "Pricing for a Last-Mile Transportation System," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 57-69.
    6. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    7. Jian Chen & Rui Li & Mi Gan & Zhiyan Fu & Fatao Yuan, 2020. "Public Acceptance of Driverless Buses in China: An Empirical Analysis Based on an Extended UTAUT Model," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-13, November.
    8. Nordlund, A. & Jansson, J. & Westin, K., 2018. "Acceptability of electric vehicle aimed measures: Effects of norm activation, perceived justice and effectiveness," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 205-213.
    9. Ning, Yu & Yan, Mian & Xu, Su Xiu & Li, Yina & Li, Lixu, 2021. "Shared parking acceptance under perceived network externality and risks: Theory and evidence," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 1-15.
    10. Yu Wang & Shanyong Wang & Jing Wang & Jiuchang Wei & Chenglin Wang, 2020. "An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services: using an extended technology acceptance model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 397-415, February.
    11. Ralf-Martin Soe & Jaanus Müür, 2020. "Mobility Acceptance Factors of an Automated Shuttle Bus Last-Mile Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Niu, Zhipeng & Hu, Xiaowei & Qi, Shouming & Yang, Haihua & Wang, Siqing & An, Shi, 2021. "Determinants to parking mode alternatives: A model integrating technology acceptance model and satisfaction–loyalty model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 216-234.
    13. Peng Jing & Hao Huang & Bin Ran & Fengping Zhan & Yuji Shi, 2019. "Exploring the Factors Affecting Mode Choice Intention of Autonomous Vehicle Based on an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior—A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, February.
    14. Yang, Chung-Shan, 2019. "Maritime shipping digitalization: Blockchain-based technology applications, future improvements, and intention to use," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 108-117.
    15. Yochanan E. Bigman & Kurt Gray, 2020. "Life and death decisions of autonomous vehicles," Nature, Nature, vol. 579(7797), pages 1-2, March.
    16. Alcaraz, Juan J. & Caballero-Arnaldos, Luis & Vales-Alonso, Javier, 2019. "Rich vehicle routing problem with last-mile outsourcing decisions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 263-286.
    17. Chee, Pei Nen Esther & Susilo, Yusak O. & Wong, Yiik Diew, 2020. "Determinants of intention-to-use first-/last-mile automated bus service," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 350-375.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naihui Wang & Yulong Pei & Yi-Jia Wang, 2022. "Antecedents in Determining Users’ Acceptance of Electric Shuttle Bus Services," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Wang, Yi-Jia & Wang, Yue & Huang, George Q. & Lin, Ciyun, 2024. "Public acceptance of crowdsourced delivery from a customer perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(3), pages 793-805.
    3. Kum Fai Yuen & Grace Chua & Xueqin Wang & Fei Ma & Kevin X. Li, 2020. "Understanding Public Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Azra Shamim & Awais Ali Khan & Muhammad Ahsan Qureshi & Hamaad Rafique & Adnan Akhunzada, 2021. "Ride or Not to Ride: Does the Customer Deviate toward Ridesharing?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Bircan Arslannur & Ahmet Tortum, 2023. "Public Transport Modeling for Commuting in Cities with Different Development Levels Using Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    6. Wang, Xingdong & Lu, Pan, 2021. "Drivers of Farmers’ Intentions to Use Eco-Breeding: Integrating the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Norm Activation Model," 2021 ASAE 10th International Conference (Virtual), January 11-13, Beijing, China 329393, Asian Society of Agricultural Economists (ASAE).
    7. Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy Quy & Truong, Thi Minh & Nguyen, Minh Hieu & Pham, Huong-Giang & Li, Zhi-Chun & Oviedo-Trespalacios, Oscar, 2024. "What factors influence the intention to use electric motorcycles in motorcycle-dominated countries? An empirical study in Vietnam," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 193-204.
    8. Yunxiang Zhang & Xianmin Song & Pengfei Tao & Haitao Li & Tianshu Zhan & Qian Cao, 2023. "Investigating Factors for Travelers’ Parking Behavior Intentions in Changchun, China, under the Influence of Smart Parking Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Kyuhyeon Joo & Junghoon (Jay) Lee & Jinsoo Hwang, 2022. "NAM and TPB Approach to Consumers’ Decision-Making Framework in the Context of Indoor Smart Farm Restaurants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Xiaojie Zhang & Lili Wang, 2022. "Factors Contributing to Citizens’ Participation in COVID-19 Prevention and Control in China: An Integrated Model Based on Theory of Planned Behavior, Norm Activation Model, and Political Opportunity S," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Nketiah, Emmanuel & Song, Huaming & Cai, Xiang & Adjei, Mavis & Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson & Obuobi, Bright, 2022. "Citizens’ intention to invest in municipal solid waste to energy projects in Ghana: The impact of direct and indirect effects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    12. Chun-Hsi Vivian Chen & Yu-Cheng Chen, 2021. "Assessment of Enhancing Employee Engagement in Energy-Saving Behavior at Workplace: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, February.
    13. Hang Lu & APPC 2018–2019 ASK Group & Kenneth Winneg & Kathleen Hall Jamieson & Dolores Albarracín, 2020. "Intentions to Seek Information About the Influenza Vaccine: The Role of Informational Subjective Norms, Anticipated and Experienced Affect, and Information Insufficiency Among Vaccinated and Unvaccina," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(10), pages 2040-2056, October.
    14. Tuğba Yeğin & Muhammad Ikram, 2022. "Analysis of Consumers’ Electric Vehicle Purchase Intentions: An Expansion of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, September.
    15. Lars E. Olsson & Jana Huck & Margareta Friman, 2018. "Intention for Car Use Reduction: Applying a Stage-Based Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, January.
    16. Han, Heesup & Hyun, Sunghyup Sean, 2018. "What influences water conservation and towel reuse practices of hotel guests?," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 87-97.
    17. Muhammad Yaseen Bhutto & Yasir Ali Soomro & Hailan Yang, 2022. "Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: Predicting Young Consumer Purchase Behavior of Energy-Efficient Appliances (Evidence From Developing Economy)," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, February.
    18. Maria Rodrigues & João F. Proença & Rita Macedo, 2023. "Determinants of the Purchase of Secondhand Products: An Approach by the Theory of Planned Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    19. Joachim P. Hasebrook & Leonie Michalak & Anna Wessels & Sabine Koenig & Stefan Spierling & Stefan Kirmsse, 2022. "Green Behavior: Factors Influencing Behavioral Intention and Actual Environmental Behavior of Employees in the Financial Service Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-35, August.
    20. Nik Masdek Nik Rozana & Wong Kelly Kai Seng & Mohd Nawi Nolila & Sharifuddin Juwaidah & Wong Wang Li, 2023. "Antecedents of sustainable food waste management behaviour: Empirical evidence from urban households in Malaysia," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 53-77, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14383-:d:961846. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.