IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i19p10352-d648077.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ride or Not to Ride: Does the Customer Deviate toward Ridesharing?

Author

Listed:
  • Azra Shamim

    (College of Computing and Information Technology at Khulais, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 23218, Saudi Arabia)

  • Awais Ali Khan

    (Department of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Ahsan Qureshi

    (College of Computing and Information Technology at Khulais, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 23218, Saudi Arabia)

  • Hamaad Rafique

    (School of Computer Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China)

  • Adnan Akhunzada

    (Faculty of Computing and Informatics, University Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu 88400, Malaysia)

Abstract

Traditional taxi services have now been transformed into e-hailing applications (EHA) such as Uber, Careem, Hailo, and Grab Car globally due to the proliferation of smartphone technology. On the one hand, these applications provide transport facilities. On the other hand, users are facing multiple issues in the adoption of EHAs. Despite problems, EHAs are still widely adopted globally. However, a sparse amount of research has been conducted related to EHAs, particular in regards to exploring the significant factors of intention behind using EHAs Therefore, there is a need to identify influencing factors that have a great impact on the adoption and acceptance of these applications. Hence, this research aims to present an empirical study on the factors influencing customers’ intentions towards EHAs. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was extended with four external factors: perceived mobility value, effort expectancy, perceived locational accuracy, and perceived price. A questionnaire was developed for the measurement of these factors. A survey was conducted with 211 users of EHAs to collect data. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to analyze the collected data. The results of this study exposed that perceived usefulness, perceived price, and perceived ease of use affect behavior intention to use EHAs. Furthermore, perceived ease of use was impacted by effort expectancy, perceived locational accuracy, and perceived mobility. The findings of the study provide a foundation to develop new guidelines for such applications that will be beneficial for developers and designers of these applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Azra Shamim & Awais Ali Khan & Muhammad Ahsan Qureshi & Hamaad Rafique & Adnan Akhunzada, 2021. "Ride or Not to Ride: Does the Customer Deviate toward Ridesharing?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10352-:d:648077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10352/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10352/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Junze Wang & Sheng Zhao & Wei Zhang & Richard Evans, 2021. "Why people adopt smart transportation services: an integrated model of TAM, trust and perceived risk," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(6), pages 629-646, August.
    2. Di, Xuan & Ma, Rui & Liu, Henry X. & Ban, Xuegang (Jeff), 2018. "A link-node reformulation of ridesharing user equilibrium with network design," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 230-255.
    3. Shen, Weiwei & Xiao, Weizhou & Wang, Xin, 2016. "Passenger satisfaction evaluation model for Urban rail transit: A structural equation modeling based on partial least squares," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 20-31.
    4. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    5. David Gabel, 2016. "Uber and the Persistence of Market Power," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(2), pages 527-534, April.
    6. Ma, Jie & Xu, Min & Meng, Qiang & Cheng, Lin, 2020. "Ridesharing user equilibrium problem under OD-based surge pricing strategy," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1-24.
    7. Yu Wang & Shanyong Wang & Jing Wang & Jiuchang Wei & Chenglin Wang, 2020. "An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services: using an extended technology acceptance model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 397-415, February.
    8. Garima Malik & A. Sajeevan Rao, 2019. "Extended expectation-confirmation model to predict continued usage of ODR/ride hailing apps: role of perceived value and self-efficacy," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 461-482, December.
    9. Mostafa, Mohamed M. & El-Masry, Ahmed A., 2013. "Citizens as consumers: Profiling e-government services’ users in Egypt via data mining techniques," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 627-641.
    10. Bernadette Szajna, 1996. "Empirical Evaluation of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 85-92, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naihui Wang & Yulong Pei & Hao Fu, 2022. "Public Acceptance of Last-Mile Shuttle Bus Services with Automation and Electrification in Cold-Climate Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Yavas, Volkan & Yavaş Tez, Özge, 2023. "Consumer intention over upcoming utopia: Urban air mobility," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    3. Xingyuan Li & Jing Bai, 2021. "A Ridesharing Choice Behavioral Equilibrium Model with Users of Heterogeneous Values of Time," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Joachim P. Hasebrook & Leonie Michalak & Anna Wessels & Sabine Koenig & Stefan Spierling & Stefan Kirmsse, 2022. "Green Behavior: Factors Influencing Behavioral Intention and Actual Environmental Behavior of Employees in the Financial Service Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-35, August.
    5. Mohammadbashir Sedighi & Hamideh Parsaeiyan & Yashar Araghi, 2021. "An Empirical Study of Intention to Continue Using of Digital Ride-hailing Platforms," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 489-515, November.
    6. Ingvardson, Jesper Bláfoss & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2019. "The relationship between norms, satisfaction and public transport use: A comparison across six European cities using structural equation modelling," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 37-57.
    7. Noruzoliaee, Mohamadhossein & Zou, Bo & Zhou, Yan (Joann), 2021. "Truck platooning in the U.S. national road network: A system-level modeling approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    8. Li, Tongfei & Xu, Min & Sun, Huijun & Xiong, Jie & Dou, Xueping, 2023. "Stochastic ridesharing equilibrium problem with compensation optimization," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    9. Viswanath Venkatesh, 2000. "Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 342-365, December.
    10. Kwee-Fah Lee & Ahasanul Haque & Suharni Maulan, 2018. "Understanding the Effect of Consumer Perceptions on Buying Intention for Air Tickets Online in Malaysia," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(2), pages 423-439, February.
    11. Gao, Tao (Tony) & Rohm, Andrew J. & Sultan, Fareena & Pagani, Margherita, 2013. "Consumers un-tethered: A three-market empirical study of consumers' mobile marketing acceptance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2536-2544.
    12. Nuray Cakirli Akyüz & Ludwig Theuvsen, 2020. "The Impact of Behavioral Drivers on Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Practices: The Case of Organic Farming in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Kum Fai Yuen & Grace Chua & Xueqin Wang & Fei Ma & Kevin X. Li, 2020. "Understanding Public Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-19, June.
    14. Ma, Jie & Meng, Qiang & Cheng, Lin & Liu, Zhiyuan, 2022. "General stochastic ridesharing user equilibrium problem with elastic demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 162-194.
    15. Bonnin Roca, Jaime & O'Sullivan, Eoin, 2020. "Seeking coherence between barriers to manufacturing technology adoption and innovation policy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    16. Noruzoliaee, Mohamadhossein & Zou, Bo, 2022. "One-to-many matching and section-based formulation of autonomous ridesharing equilibrium," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 72-100.
    17. Hsu, Chin-Lung & Lu, Hsi-Peng & Hsu, Huei-Hsia, 2007. "Adoption of the mobile Internet: An empirical study of multimedia message service (MMS)," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 715-726, December.
    18. Sun, S. & Szeto, W.Y., 2021. "Multi-class stochastic user equilibrium assignment model with ridesharing: Formulation and policy implications," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 203-227.
    19. Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy Quy & Su, Diep Ngoc & Nguyen, Minh Hieu & Vo, Nguyen S. & Oviedo-Trespalacios, Oscar, 2022. "Factors influencing intention to use on-demand shared ride-hailing services in Vietnam: risk, cost or sustainability?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    20. Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson & Song, Huaming & Asamoah, Ama Nyarko & Li, Liang & Nketiah, Emmanuel & Obuobi, Bright & Adjei, Mavis & Cudjoe, Dan, 2022. "Towards sustainable vehicular transport: Empirical assessment of battery swap technology adoption in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10352-:d:648077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.