IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14259-d959939.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Apparent and Intellectual Sustainability Independence on the Credibility Gap of the Accounting Information

Author

Listed:
  • Madher E. Hamdallah

    (Business Faculty, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman 11733, Jordan)

  • Salem Al-N’eimat

    (Business Faculty, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman 11733, Jordan)

  • Anan F. Srouji

    (King Talal School of Business Technology, Princess Sumaya University for Technology, Amman 11941, Jordan)

  • Manaf Al-Okaily

    (School of Business, Jadara University, Irbid 21110, Jordan)

  • Khaldoon Albitar

    (Faculty of Business and Law, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2UP, UK)

Abstract

This study aims to recognize the sustainability independence of the Jordanian Association of Certified Public Accountants (JACPA/JCPA) and its impact on the credibility gap of the accounting information of companies operating in Jordan. This study demonstrates the effects of the apparent and intellectual sustainability independence on the credibility gap of accounting information. A total of 93 online questionnaires were analyzed using multiple regressions. The results revealed an impact of the apparent independence of the JCPA on the quality of the information credibility gap related to service fees, and no statistically significant impact for both consulting and accounting service fees was found. This study also concludes research regarding the impact of intellectual independence of the JCPA on the information credibility gap regarding the code of professional ethics and the commitment of auditing offices to their customers.

Suggested Citation

  • Madher E. Hamdallah & Salem Al-N’eimat & Anan F. Srouji & Manaf Al-Okaily & Khaldoon Albitar, 2022. "The Effect of Apparent and Intellectual Sustainability Independence on the Credibility Gap of the Accounting Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14259-:d:959939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14259/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14259/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan Svanberg & Peter Öhman, 2013. "Auditors' time pressure: does ethical culture support audit quality?," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 28(7), pages 572-591, July.
    2. Bennett, G. Bradley & Hatfield, Richard C., 2018. "Staff auditors' proclivity for computer-mediated communication with clients and its effect on skeptical behavior," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 68, pages 42-57.
    3. Andreea Claudia Crucean & Camelia Daniela Hategan, 2019. "The Determinants Factors on Audit Quality: A Theoretical Approach," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 702-710, December.
    4. Mélanie Roussy & Odile Barbe & Sophie Raimbault, 2020. "Internal audit: from effectiveness to organizational significance," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(2), pages 322-342, January.
    5. Ahmad Hammami & Rucsandra Moldovan & Elisabeth Peltier, 2020. "Salary perception and career prospects in audit firms," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(6), pages 759-793, May.
    6. Mihai Carp & Costel Istrate, 2021. "Audit Quality under Influences of Audit Firm and Auditee Characteristics: Evidence from the Romanian Regulated Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Chunhua Xin & Xiaolu Hao & Lu Cheng, 2022. "Do Environmental Administrative Penalties Affect Audit Fees? Results from Multiple Econometric Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-25, April.
    8. Donald L. Ariail & Katherine Taken Smith & L. Murphy Smith, 2020. "Do United States accountants' personal values match the profession's values (ethics code)?," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(5), pages 1047-1075, April.
    9. Daniela Maresch & Ewald Aschauer & Matthias Fink, 2019. "Competence trust, goodwill trust and negotiation power in auditor-client relationships," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(2), pages 335-355, November.
    10. Jelinek, Ronald & Jelinek, Kate, 2008. "Auditors gone wild: The "other" problem in public accounting," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 223-233.
    11. Madher E. Hamdallah & Anan F. Srouji & Suzan R. Abed, 2021. "The nexus between reducing audit report lags and divining integrated financial report governance disclosures: should ASE directives be more conspicuous?," Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 81-103.
    12. Isaac Monday Ikpor & Enrico Bracci & Clementina Iruka Kanu & Riccardo Ievoli & Benedette Okezie & Sunday Mlanga & Charles Ogbaekirigwe, 2022. "Drivers of Sustainability Accounting and Reporting in Emerging Economies: Evidence from Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Husam Aldeen Al-Khadash & Ahmad Y. Khasawneh, 2014. "The Effects of the Fair Value Option under IAS 40 on the Volatility of Earnings," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 4(5), pages 1-8.
    14. Teddy Ossei Kwakye & Emerald Edem Welbeck & Godfred Matthew Yaw Owusu & Fred Kwasi Anokye, 2018. "Determinants of intention to engage in Sustainability Accounting & Reporting (SAR): the perspective of professional accountants," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Ayman A. Alsmadi & Ahmed Shuhaiber & Loai N. Alhawamdeh & Rasha Alghazzawi & Manaf Al-Okaily, 2022. "Twenty Years of Mobile Banking Services Development and Sustainability: A Bibliometric Analysis Overview (2000–2020)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, August.
    16. Josh Wei-Jun Hsueh, 2018. "Governance Structure and the Credibility Gap: Experimental Evidence on Family Businesses’ Sustainability Reporting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(2), pages 547-568, December.
    17. Saiewitz, Aaron & Kida, Thomas, 2018. "The effects of an auditor's communication mode and professional tone on client responses to audit inquiries," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 33-43.
    18. Daoust, Laurence & Malsch, Bertrand, 2019. "How ex-auditors remember their past: The transformation of audit experience into cultural memory," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Li-Jen He & Jianxiong Chen, 2021. "Does Mandatory Audit Partner Rotation Influence Auditor Selection Strategies?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    20. Akihiro Yamada & Kento Fujita, 2022. "Impact of Parent Companies and Multiple Large Shareholders on Audit Fees in Stakeholder-Oriented Corporate Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.
    21. Chen, Qiu & Kelly, Khim & Salterio, Steven E., 2012. "Do changes in audit actions and attitudes consistent with increased auditor scepticism deter aggressive earnings management? An experimental investigation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 95-115.
    22. Gholamhossein Mahdavi & Abbas Ali Daryaei, 2016. "Attitude toward auditing, marketing and corporate governance (An examination based in Parsons’ social action theory)," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-16, December.
    23. Gholamhossein Mahdavi & Abbas Ali Daryaei, 2016. "Auditing marketing and corporate governance," International Journal of Business Forecasting and Marketing Intelligence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(3), pages 190-214.
    24. Mahmood Al-Bashayreh & Dmaithan Almajali & Ahmad Altamimi & Ra’ed Masa’deh & Manaf Al-Okaily, 2022. "An Empirical Investigation of Reasons Influencing Student Acceptance and Rejection of Mobile Learning Apps Usage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, April.
    25. Emett, Scott A. & Libby, Robert & Nelson, Mark W., 2018. "PCAOB guidance and audits of fair values for Level 2 investments," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 57-72.
    26. Norman, Carolyn Strand & Rose, Jacob M. & Suh, Ik Seon, 2011. "The effects of disclosure type and audit committee expertise on Chief Audit Executives' tolerance for financial misstatements," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 102-108, February.
    27. Jeffrey L. Hoopes & Kenneth J. Merkley & Joseph Pacelli & Joseph H. Schroeder, 2018. "Audit personnel salaries and audit quality," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1096-1136, September.
    28. Rabih Nehme, 2017. "Performance evaluation of auditors: a constructive or a destructive tool of audit output," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(2), pages 215-231, February.
    29. Hussaini Bala & Noor Afza Amran & Hasnah Shaari, 2019. "Audit committee attributes and cosmetic accounting in Nigeria," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(2), pages 177-206, November.
    30. Michael Forzeh Fossung & Samuel Tanjeh Mukah & Kueda Wamba Berthelo & Motika Eubert Nsai, 2022. "The Demand for External Audit Quality: The Contribution of Agency Theory in the Context of Cameroon," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, February.
    31. Wainberg, James S. & Kida, Thomas & David Piercey, M. & Smith, James F., 2013. "The impact of anecdotal data in regulatory audit firm inspection reports," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 621-636.
    32. Knechel, W. Robert, 2007. "The business risk audit: Origins, obstacles and opportunities," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(4-5), pages 383-408.
    33. Booker, K., 2018. "Can clients of economically dependent auditors benefit from voluntary audit firm rotation? An experiment with lenders," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 63-67.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abdul Rahman Al Natour & Naim Salameh Al-Qadi & Rasmi Meqbel & Hala Zaidan & Hamzah Al-Mawali & Manaf Al-Okaily, 2023. "The Role of Privatisation in Sustaining Auditor Independence: Evidence from the Developing Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chantal Mangion & Norbert Tabone & Peter J. Baldacchino & Simon Grima, 2021. "Audit Quality and Resilience beyond the Role Stress Model: A Maltese Perspective," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 11(3), pages 37-56.
    2. Kristina Peštović & Nikola Milicevic & Nenad Djokic & Ines Djokic, 2021. "Audit Service Quality Perceived by Customers: Formative Modelling Measurement Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Dmaithan Almajali & Manaf Al-Okaily & Khaleel Al-Daoud & Sulaiman Weshah & Aijaz A. Shaikh, 2022. "Go Cashless! Mobile Payment Apps Acceptance in Developing Countries: The Jordanian Context Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Aghazadeh, Sanaz & Joe, Jennifer R., 2022. "Auditors' response to management confidence and misstatement risk," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    5. Dierynck, Bart & Kadous, Kathryn & Peters, Christian P. H., 2024. "Learning in the auditing profession: A framework and future directions," Other publications TiSEM eb74c8e4-bc4a-4b71-b88a-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Beau, Pauline & Jerman, Lambert, 2024. "Working apart: Remote working and social bonding in the Big Four audit firms," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Bennett, G. Bradley & Hatfield, Richard C., 2018. "Staff auditors' proclivity for computer-mediated communication with clients and its effect on skeptical behavior," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 68, pages 42-57.
    8. Douthit, Jeremy D. & Kachelmeier, Steven J. & Van Landuyt, Ben W., 2024. "Does auditor assurance of client prosocial activities affect subsequent reporter-auditor negotiations?," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    9. Siti Nurulhuda Mamat & Khair Syakira Bustamam & Siti Azrina Adanan & Amilia Saidin & A’ieshah Abdullah Sani & Khairunnisa Abd Samad, 2023. "Exploring Communication Channel Selection for Enhanced Audit Quality: Internship Student's Perspective," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 15(3), pages 314-324.
    10. Shalini TALWAR & Chitra PUNDIR, 2019. "Corporate Governance: A Look through the Auditing Lens with reference to India," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 78-84.
    11. Sabine Graschitz & Simona Holzknecht & Marcel Steller, 2023. "Perceived Attractiveness of Tax Consultancy and Auditing Professions: Insights From a German-Speaking Area," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    12. Guénin-Paracini, Henri & Malsch, Bertrand & Paillé, Anne Marché, 2014. "Fear and risk in the audit process," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 264-288.
    13. Du Jianguo & Rauf Ibrahim & Peter Lartey Yao & Rupa Jaladi Santosh & Amponsah Clinton Kwabena, 2019. "The Effectiveness of Internal Controls in Rural Community Banks: Evidence from Ghana," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(1), pages 202-218, December.
    14. Goodson, Brian M. & Grenier, Jonathan H. & Maksymov, Eldar, 2023. "When law students think like audit litigation attorneys: Implications for experimental research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    15. Kitto, Andrew R., 2024. "The effects of non-Big 4 mergers on audit efficiency and audit market competition☆," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1).
    16. Dongxiao Wu & Xinzhong Bao & Qiulan Su, 2023. "From Green Ideas to Green Savings: Assessing the Financial Impact of Green Innovations on Audit Fees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-15, July.
    17. Isaac Monday Ikpor & Enrico Bracci & Clementina Iruka Kanu & Riccardo Ievoli & Benedette Okezie & Sunday Mlanga & Charles Ogbaekirigwe, 2022. "Drivers of Sustainability Accounting and Reporting in Emerging Economies: Evidence from Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Ferdinand A Gul & Arifur Khan & Karen Lai & Getie Dessalegn & Mohammad Badrul Muttakin, 2023. "Corporate political donations and audit fees: Some evidence from Australian audit pricing," Post-Print hal-04511816, HAL.
    19. Aaron Saiewitz & Elaine (Ying) Wang, 2020. "Using Cultural Mindsets to Reduce Cross‐National Auditor Judgment Differences," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 1854-1881, September.
    20. Power, Michael & Tuck, Penelope, 2024. "The firm that would not die: post-death organizing, alumni events, and organization ghosts," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119973, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14259-:d:959939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.