IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p11724-d663345.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Audit Service Quality Perceived by Customers: Formative Modelling Measurement Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Kristina Peštović

    (Faculty of Economics in Subotica, University of Novi Sad, 24000 Subotica, Serbia)

  • Nikola Milicevic

    (Faculty of Economics in Subotica, University of Novi Sad, 24000 Subotica, Serbia)

  • Nenad Djokic

    (Faculty of Economics in Subotica, University of Novi Sad, 24000 Subotica, Serbia)

  • Ines Djokic

    (Faculty of Economics in Subotica, University of Novi Sad, 24000 Subotica, Serbia)

Abstract

The imperative to measure perceived service quality by a formative model in which it represents higher-order formative construct, consisting of reflective first-order constructs ((sub)dimensions), is defined in leading marketing literature in previous years. That approach is of special importance since model misspecifications were often occurring in perceived service quality measurement researches, which may lead to totally wrong conclusions. Furthermore, when it comes to the perceived audit service quality, according to the knowledge of the authors, this is the first implementation of the described approach. Besides the analysis of perceived quality dimensions (all of them originate from intensively used SERVQUAL instrument and are adopted to audit service quality: tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance and empathy), the model included relations between quality and client’s satisfaction and loyalty. The results were obtained by processing 123 responses from Serbian companies. All dimensions of perceived quality influenced it positively and significantly (the strongest influence is related to assurance, followed by responsiveness; smaller coefficient with relatively similar value describes the influence of reliability; followed by empathy; the weakest is the impact of tangibles). Furthermore, research results pointed to the existence of positive relations between audit quality, satisfaction and loyalty. Hereby, satisfaction partially mediates the relationship between quality and loyalty.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristina Peštović & Nikola Milicevic & Nenad Djokic & Ines Djokic, 2021. "Audit Service Quality Perceived by Customers: Formative Modelling Measurement Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11724-:d:663345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11724/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11724/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan Kilgore & Renee Radich & Graeme Harrison, 2011. "The Relative Importance of Audit Quality Attributes," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 21(3), pages 253-265, September.
    2. Brant E. Christensen & Steven M. Glover & Thomas C. Omer & Marjorie K. Shelley, 2016. "Understanding Audit Quality: Insights from Audit Professionals and Investors," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(4), pages 1648-1684, December.
    3. Chee‐Yeow Lim & Hun‐Tong Tan, 2008. "Non‐audit Service Fees and Audit Quality: The Impact of Auditor Specialization," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 199-246, March.
    4. Mihai Carp & Costel Istrate, 2021. "Audit Quality under Influences of Audit Firm and Auditee Characteristics: Evidence from the Romanian Regulated Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.
    5. DeAngelo, Linda Elizabeth, 1981. "Auditor size and audit quality," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 183-199, December.
    6. Pietro A. Bianchi, 2018. "Auditors’ Joint Engagements and Audit Quality: Evidence from Italian Private Companies," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(3), pages 1533-1577, September.
    7. Katrin Marquardt & Marieta Olaru & Ioana Ceausu, 2017. "Study on the Development of Quality Measurements Models for Steering Business Services in Relation to Customer Satisfaction," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(44), pages 1-95, February.
    8. Sook Min Kim & Seon Mi Kim & Dong Heun Lee & Seung Weon Yoo, 2019. "How Investors Perceive Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, February.
    9. Corrado Crocetta & Laura Antonucci & Rosanna Cataldo & Roberto Galasso & Maria Gabriella Grassia & Carlo Natale Lauro & Marina Marino, 2021. "Higher-Order PLS-PM Approach for Different Types of Constructs," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 154(2), pages 725-754, April.
    10. Morton Pincus & Feng Tian & Patricia Wellmeyer & Sean Xin Xu, 2017. "Do Clients’ Enterprise Systems Affect Audit Quality and Efficiency?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(4), pages 1975-2021, December.
    11. Kenneth J. Reichelt & Dechun Wang, 2010. "National and Office‐Specific Measures of Auditor Industry Expertise and Effects on Audit Quality," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3), pages 647-686, June.
    12. Jarvis, Cheryl Burke & MacKenzie, Scott B & Podsakoff, Philip M, 2003. "A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(2), pages 199-218, September.
    13. Jeffrey L. Hoopes & Kenneth J. Merkley & Joseph Pacelli & Joseph H. Schroeder, 2018. "Audit personnel salaries and audit quality," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1096-1136, September.
    14. Erik L. Beardsley & Dennis R. Lassila & Thomas C. Omer, 2019. "How Do Audit Offices Respond to Audit Fee Pressure? Evidence of Increased Focus on Nonaudit Services and their Impact on Audit Quality," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 999-1027, June.
    15. Rani Hoitash & Ariel Markelevich & Charles A. Barragato, 2007. "Auditor fees and audit quality," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 22(8), pages 761-786, September.
    16. Kenneth L. Bills & Quinn T. Swanquist & Robert L. Whited, 2016. "Growing Pains: Audit Quality and Office Growth," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 288-313, March.
    17. Wuchun Chi & Linda A. Myers & Thomas C. Omer & Hong Xie, 2017. "The effects of audit partner pre-client and client-specific experience on audit quality and on perceptions of audit quality," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 361-391, March.
    18. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.
    19. Kym Boon & Jill McKinnon & Philip Ross, 2008. "Audit service quality in compulsory audit tendering," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(2), pages 93-122, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Han-Khanh Nguyen, 2022. "A 3-Dimensional Frame of Reference for Prevention of Risk in Supply Chain," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beardsley, Erik L. & Imdieke, Andrew J. & Omer, Thomas C., 2021. "The distraction effect of non-audit services on audit quality," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(2).
    2. Anastassia Fedyk & James Hodson & Natalya Khimich & Tatiana Fedyk, 2022. "Is artificial intelligence improving the audit process?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 938-985, September.
    3. Xiong, Hao & Hou, Fei & Li, Hanwen & Wang, Huabing, 2020. "Does rice farming shape audit quality: Evidence from signing auditors level analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 403-420.
    4. Shivaram Rajgopal & Suraj Srinivasan & Xin Zheng, 2021. "Measuring audit quality," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 559-619, June.
    5. Christensen, Brant E. & Newton, Nathan J. & Wilkins, Michael S., 2021. "How do team workloads and team staffing affect the audit? Archival evidence from U.S. audits," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    6. Giuseppe Iuliano & Gaetano Matonti, 2015. "Do big 4 audit companies detect earnings management and report it in the audit opinion? Empirical evidence from italian non-listed firms," ESPERIENZE D'IMPRESA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(2), pages 5-43.
    7. Donelson, Dain C. & Ege, Matthew & Imdieke, Andrew J. & Maksymov, Eldar, 2020. "The revival of large consulting practices at the Big 4 and audit quality," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    8. Guangming Gong & Liang Xiao & Si Xu & Xun Gong, 2019. "Do Bond Investors Care About Engagement Auditors’ Negative Experiences? Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 779-806, September.
    9. Kuo, Nan-Ting & Li, Shu & Du, Ya-Guang & Lee, Cheng-Few, 2022. "Does individual auditor quality contribute to firm value? Evidence from the market valuation on corporate cash holdings," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 135-153.
    10. Nathan R. Berglund, 2020. "Do Client Bankruptcies Preceded by Clean Audit Opinions Damage Auditor Reputation?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 1914-1951, September.
    11. Jian Cao & Feng Chen & Julia L. Higgs, 2016. "Late for a very important date: financial reporting and audit implications of late 10-K filings," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 633-671, June.
    12. Helmi A. Boshnak, 2021. "The Impact of Audit Committee Characteristics on Audit Quality: Evidence from Saudi Arabia," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 11(4), pages 1-12.
    13. Aobdia, Daniel, 2019. "Do practitioner assessments agree with academic proxies for audit quality? Evidence from PCAOB and internal inspections," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 144-174.
    14. Lorenzo Dal Maso & Gerald J. Lobo & Francesco Mazzi & Luc Paugam, 2020. "Implications of the Joint Provision of CSR Assurance and Financial Audit for Auditors' Assessment of Going‐Concern Risk†," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(2), pages 1248-1289, June.
    15. Jeffrey L. Hoopes & Kenneth J. Merkley & Joseph Pacelli & Joseph H. Schroeder, 2018. "Audit personnel salaries and audit quality," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1096-1136, September.
    16. Mohamed M. El-Dyasty & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2022. "Multiple audit mechanism, audit quality and cost of debt: empirical evidence from a developing country," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 264-281, September.
    17. Xingqiang Du, 2019. "Does CEO-Auditor Dialect Sharing Impair Pre-IPO Audit Quality? Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(3), pages 699-735, May.
    18. Cory Cassell & Emily Hunt & Gans Narayanamoorthy & Stephen P. Rowe, 2019. "A hidden risk of auditor industry specialization: evidence from the financial crisis," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 891-926, September.
    19. Mehdi Nekhili & Fahim Javed & Haithem Nagati, 2022. "Audit Partner Gender, Leadership and Ethics: The Case of Earnings Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(2), pages 233-260, May.
    20. Kharuddin, Khairul Ayuni Mohd & Basioudis, Ilias G & Farooque, Omar Al, 2021. "Effects of the Big 4 national and city-level industry expertise on audit quality in the United Kingdom," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11724-:d:663345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.