IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14243-d959405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determination of Critical Factors for Success in Business Incubators and Startups in East Java

Author

Listed:
  • Habiburrahman

    (Faculty Economic and Business, Universitas Bandar Lampung, Bandar Lampung 35142, Indonesia)

  • Andjar Prasetyo

    (Regional Development Planning Agency, Magelang City 56172, Indonesia)

  • Tri Wedha Raharjo

    (Regional Development Planning Agency, Surabaya 60174, Indonesia)

  • Herrukmi Septa Rinawati

    (Regional Development Planning Agency, Surabaya 60174, Indonesia)

  • Trisnani

    (National Research and Innovation Agency, Jakarta 10340, Indonesia)

  • Bambang Riawan Eko

    (National Research and Innovation Agency, Jakarta 10340, Indonesia)

  • Wahyudiyono

    (National Research and Innovation Agency, Jakarta 10340, Indonesia)

  • Sekar Nur Wulandari

    (Planning, Research and Development Agency, Tanjung Pinang 29113, Indonesia)

  • Mochammad Fahlevi

    (Management Department, BINUS Online Learning, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta 11480, Indonesia)

  • Mohammed Aljuaid

    (Department of Health Administration, College of Business Administration, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Petra Heidler

    (IMC Fachhochschule Krems, University of Applied Sciences Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria)

Abstract

The reference to the success factors of incubators and startups in running their business so far has been ambiguous. The purpose of this study is to analyze the critical factors that can affect the success of incubators and startups. The quantitative research method describes the research results. The study locus is in East Java Province, Indonesia with primary data from respondents in five regions: Banyuwangi, Jember, Madiun, Malang, and Surabaya. The number of respondents was 41 from incubators and 59 from startups with identification of domicile, type of business, and business turnover. Data was collected using surveys and interviews with 100 respondents. The analysis in this study uses eleven factors that are assumed to be factors of business success that have been tested with Kaiser Meyer Olkin Measure (KMO), Measure of Sampling Adequacy (MSA), Bartlett’s test, and Cronbach Alpha. The critical point used for the KMO value is between 0.5 and 1, the MSA test critical point is 0.5, Bartlett’s test is less than the significance level (α = 0.05), and α cronbach ≥ 0.60. The analyzed factors are as follows: synergy products; processes; innovation management; communication; culture; experience; information technology; innovation skills; functional skills; and implementation skills. As a result, incubators and startups agree on eleven critical factors to building their business success, but there are differences in the priority scale between incubators and startups on these eleven factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Habiburrahman & Andjar Prasetyo & Tri Wedha Raharjo & Herrukmi Septa Rinawati & Trisnani & Bambang Riawan Eko & Wahyudiyono & Sekar Nur Wulandari & Mochammad Fahlevi & Mohammed Aljuaid & Petra Heidler, 2022. "Determination of Critical Factors for Success in Business Incubators and Startups in East Java," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14243-:d:959405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14243/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14243/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Yucheng & Hou, Zhongwei & Yang, Feifei & Yang, Miles M. & Wang, Zhiling, 2021. "Discovering the evolution of resource-based theory: Science mapping based on bibliometric analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 500-516.
    2. Lin, Hsing-Er & Hsu, I-Chieh & Hsu, Audrey Wenhsin & Chung, Hsi-Mei, 2020. "Creating competitive advantages: Interactions between ambidextrous diversification strategy and contextual factors from a dynamic capability perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    3. Lopes, João & Farinha, Luís & Ferreira, João J. & Silveira, Paulo, 2018. "Does regional VRIO model help policy-makers to assess the resources of a region? A stakeholder perception approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 659-670.
    4. Ferratti, Gustavo M. & Sacomano Neto, Mario & Candido, Silvio E.A., 2021. "Controversies in an information technology startup: A critical actor-network analysis of the entrepreneurial process," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    5. Ye, Yu & Yu, Qionglei & Zheng, Yongjun & Zheng, Yi, 2022. "Investigating the effect of social media application on firm capabilities and performance: The perspective of dynamic capability view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 510-519.
    6. Chin, Tachia & Shi, Yi & Singh, Sanjay Kumar & Agbanyo, George Kwame & Ferraris, Alberto, 2022. "Leveraging blockchain technology for green innovation in ecosystem-based business models: A dynamic capability of values appropriation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    7. Ghosh, Swapan & Hughes, Mat & Hodgkinson, Ian & Hughes, Paul, 2022. "Digital transformation of industrial businesses: A dynamic capability approach," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    8. Hyun, Suk & Lee, Hyo Seob, 2022. "Positive effects of portfolio financing strategy for startups," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 623-633.
    9. Evin Özkan & Neda Azizi & Omid Haass, 2021. "Leveraging Smart Contract in Project Procurement through DLT to Gain Sustainable Competitive Advantages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-25, December.
    10. Fawwaz Awamleh & Ahmet Ertugan, 2021. "The Relationship Between Information Technology Capabilities, Organizational Intelligence, and Competitive Advantage," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    11. Asterios Stroumpoulis & Evangelia Kopanaki & George Karaganis, 2021. "Examining the Relationship between Information Systems, Sustainable SCM, and Competitive Advantage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    12. Mohamed Battour & Maged Barahma & Mohammed Al-Awlaqi, 2021. "The Relationship between HRM Strategies and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Testing the Mediating Role of Strategic Agility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, May.
    13. Siyuan Yu & Yang Zhang & Jin Yu & Xuanzhi Yang & Abbas Mardani, 2021. "The Moderating Impact of Organizational Identity Strength between Strategic Improvisation and Organizational Memory and Their Effects on Competitive Advantage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    14. Murcia, Nathanaëlle N.S. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Ferreira, João J.M., 2022. "Enhancing strategic management using a “quantified VRIO”: Adding value with the MCDA approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    15. Adomako, Samuel & Tran, Mai Dong, 2022. "Sustainable environmental strategy, firm competitiveness, and financial performance: Evidence from the mining industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andjar Prasetyo & Nana Noviana & Weni Rosdiana & M. Arief Anwar & Hartiningsih & Hendrixon & Bekti Putri Harwijayanti & Mochammad Fahlevi, 2023. "Stunting Convergence Management Framework through System Integration Based on Regional Service Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Hitmi Khalifa Alhitmi & Syed Haider Ali Shah & Rabia Kishwer & Nida Aman & Mochammad Fahlevi & Mohammed Aljuaid & Petra Heidler, 2023. "Marketing from Leadership to Innovation: A Mediated Moderation Model Investigating How Transformational Leadership Impacts Employees’ Innovative Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-22, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cássio Zanatto & Margarida Catalão‐Lopes & Joaquim P. Pina & Inês Carrilho‐Nunes, 2023. "The impact of ESG news on the volatility of the Portuguese stock market—Does it change during recessions?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5821-5832, December.
    2. Ge Zhang & Yuxiang Gao & Gaoyong Li, 2023. "Research on Digital Transformation and Green Technology Innovation—Evidence from China’s Listed Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Chu, Mingbin & Li, Bingwei & Gu, Weiyu & Dai, Xiajing, 2024. "Role of green finance in enhancing the sustainability in the mining sector in Asia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    4. Oksana Seroka‐Stolka, 2023. "Towards sustainability: An environmental strategy choice, environmental performance, and the moderating role of stakeholder pressure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5992-6007, December.
    5. Goldberg, Mitchell & Schär, Fabian, 2023. "Metaverse governance: An empirical analysis of voting within Decentralized Autonomous Organizations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    6. Muen Uddin & Shitharth Selvarajan & Muath Obaidat & Shams Ul Arfeen & Alaa O. Khadidos & Adil O. Khadidos & Maha Abdelhaq, 2023. "From Hype to Reality: Unveiling the Promises, Challenges and Opportunities of Blockchain in Supply Chain Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.
    7. Pingkuo Liu & Jiahao Wu, 2023. "Game Analysis on Energy Enterprises’ Digital Transformation—Strategic Simulation for Guiding Role, Leading Role and Following Role," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-33, June.
    8. MingCan JI & Xing Zhang, 2024. "Assessing the Impacts and Mechanisms of Green Bond Financing on the Enhancement of Green Management and Technological Innovation in Environmental Conservation Enterprises," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 12709-12750, September.
    9. Agus Joko Pramono & Suwarno & Firdaus Amyar & Renny Friska, 2023. "Sustainability Management Accounting in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals: The Role of Performance Auditing in the Manufacturing Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-13, June.
    10. Shi, Junguo & Liu, Yang & Sadowski, Bert M. & Alemzero, David & Dou, Shanshan & Sun, Huaping & Naseem, Sobia, 2023. "The role of economic growth and governance on mineral rents in main critical minerals countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    11. Fawwaz Tawfiq Awamleh & Ala Nihad Bustami, 2022. "Examine the Mediating Role of the Information Technology Capabilities on the Relationship Between Artificial Intelligence and Competitive Advantage During the COVID-19 Pandemic," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, August.
    12. Inam ul Haq & Sofia Anwar & Abdul Quddoos & Faraz Riaz, 2022. "Estimation of Digital Transformation in South Asian Economies: An Application of Broad-Spectrum Approach," Journal of Economic Impact, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 4(3), pages 152-160.
    13. Nayak, Bishwajit & Bhattacharyya, Som Sekhar & Krishnamoorthy, Bala, 2021. "Explicating the role of emerging technologies and firm capabilities towards attainment of competitive advantage in health insurance service firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    14. Suo, Xuekun & Zhang, Longting & Guo, Rong & Lin, Han & Yu, Mingchuan & Du, Xiuhong, 2024. "The inverted U-shaped association between digital economy and corporate total factor productivity: A knowledge-based perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    15. Zhao, Shuang & Zhang, Liqun & Peng, Lin & Zhou, Haiyan & Hu, Feng, 2024. "Enterprise pollution reduction through digital transformation? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    16. Limin Zou & Wan Li & Hongyi Wu & Jiawen Liu & Peng Gao, 2024. "Measuring Corporate Digital Transformation: Methodology, Indicators and Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-15, May.
    17. Marvello Yang & Norizan Jaafar & Abdullah Al Mamun & Anas A. Salameh & Noorshella Che Nawi, 2022. "Modelling the significance of strategic orientation for competitive advantage and economic sustainability: the use of hybrid SEM–neural network analysis," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, December.
    18. Pinto, Marcelo Rezende & Salume, Paula Karina & Barbosa, Marcelo Werneck & de Sousa, Paulo Renato, 2023. "The path to digital maturity: A cluster analysis of the retail industry in an emerging economy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    19. Navarro-García, Antonio & Ledesma-Chaves, Pablo & Gil-Cordero, Eloy & De-Juan-Vigaray, María Dolores, 2024. "Intangible resources, static and dynamic capabilities and perceived competitive advantage in exporting firms. A PLS-SEM/fsQCA approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    20. Federica Cappelletti & Silvia Menato, 2023. "Developing a Circular Business Model for Machinery Life Cycle Extension by Exploiting Tools for Digitalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-24, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14243-:d:959405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.