IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i19p10759-d644899.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder Collaboration Mechanism in Elderly Community Retrofit Projects: Case Study in China

Author

Listed:
  • Li Guo

    (Department of Civil Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
    School of Economics and Management Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100037, China)

  • Shuya Hao

    (School of Economics and Management Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100037, China)

  • Udara Ranasinghe

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia)

  • Maggie Liyaning Tang

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia)

  • Mary Hardie

    (School of Engineering, Design and Built Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2750, Australia)

Abstract

The aged population all over the world is predicted to increase over the next couple of years. Especially in China, the ageing population is expanding significantly every year. A ‘Home-care model’ is becoming the first choice for many elders in China due to the traditional style of community and economic considerations. However, existing communities generally lack supporting facilities for their elders. This can result in hidden safety risks in these communities. Consequently, retrofit projects among these communities of elders have attracted attention and generated studies in both academia and industry. Such elderly community retrofit projects (ECRPs) involve multiple stakeholders, and therefore, the establishment of an effective synergy mechanism for all stakeholders would provide significant value for the successful implementation of ECRPs. Until now, no such mechanism has been developed and published. This research aims to develop a stakeholder collaboration mechanism (SCM) for ECRPs in China. As the method of data collection, interviews with relevant ECRP stakeholders were conducted. Stakeholders involved with ECRPs were classified into three main categories—namely, core stakeholders (ageing families, government organisations, and ECRP companies), dormant stakeholders (other residents, other investors community committees), and marginal stakeholders (financial institutions, property service enterprises, and public welfare organisations). Finally, the SCM was developed utilising a power–interest matrix. Actions for stakeholders were recommended in order to promote ECRP in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Guo & Shuya Hao & Udara Ranasinghe & Maggie Liyaning Tang & Mary Hardie, 2021. "Stakeholder Collaboration Mechanism in Elderly Community Retrofit Projects: Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10759-:d:644899
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10759/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10759/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xin Liang & Geoffrey Qiping Shen & Li Guo, 2019. "Optimizing Incentive Policy of Energy-Efficiency Retrofit in Public Buildings: A Principal-Agent Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qi Rong & Liangfeng Shen, 2022. "Study on the Ecological Operation Model of Settlements Based on Social Network Analysis: Stakeholder Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Adityawarman Adil & Rizal Syarief & Widiatmaka & Mukhamad Najib, 2022. "Stakeholder Analysis and Prioritization of Sustainable Organic Farming Management: A Case Study of Bogor, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alfonso Marino & Paolo Pariso & Michele Picariello, 2023. "Energy use and End-use Technologies: Organizational and Energy Analysis in Italian Hospitals," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(3), pages 36-45, May.
    2. Laura Gabrielli & Aurora Greta Ruggeri & Massimiliano Scarpa, 2023. "Roadmap to a Sustainable Energy System: Is Uncertainty a Major Barrier to Investments for Building Energy Retrofit Projects in Wide City Compartments?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Ivona Ivić & Anita Cerić, 2023. "Risks Caused by Information Asymmetry in Construction Projects: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-25, June.
    4. Salah Bouktif & Ali Ouni & Sanja Lazarova-Molnar, 2022. "Towards a Rigorous Consideration of Occupant Behaviours of Residential Households for Effective Electrical Energy Savings: An Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-30, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10759-:d:644899. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.