IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p13804-d952051.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Interval Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS Integrated Model for Ergonomic Assessment of Setup Process under SMED

Author

Listed:
  • Yildiz Kose

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Management Faculty, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul 34367, Turkey)

  • Hatice Nida Civan

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Management Faculty, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul 34367, Turkey)

  • Ertugrul Ayyildiz

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon 61080, Turkey)

  • Emre Cevikcan

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Management Faculty, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul 34367, Turkey)

Abstract

Single-minute exchange of dies (SMED) is one of the most significant lean tools which reduces the required time for setup operations. The consideration of appropriate ergonomic interferences during the SMED implementation improves working conditions, productivity, and flexibility. The SMED literature has an opportunity for expansion with ergonomic assessment. Moreover, ergonomic assessment studies have various limitations in terms of a broad hierarchy of ergonomic factors and their weighting. Therefore, this study enriches the literature by providing the ergonomic assessment of the setup process through integrating multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) into SMED. In this context, a wide hierarchy of ergonomic risk factors is compiled for ergonomic assessment. The Interval Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (IVPF-AHP) method is used to determine the weights of factors. Then, Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is used to prioritize setup tasks in terms of ergonomic factors by using the Interval Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets (IVPFSs). The proposed model was validated by applying it to a real-life manufacturing system in the white goods supplier industry. The application results justify the proposed model with a setup time reduction of 58% and an ergonomic improvement of 19%.

Suggested Citation

  • Yildiz Kose & Hatice Nida Civan & Ertugrul Ayyildiz & Emre Cevikcan, 2022. "An Interval Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS Integrated Model for Ergonomic Assessment of Setup Process under SMED," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-30, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13804-:d:952051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13804/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13804/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G.K. Koulinas & O.E. Demesouka & P.K. Marhavilas & A.P. Vavatsikos & D.E. Koulouriotis, 2019. "Risk Assessment Using Fuzzy TOPSIS and PRAT for Sustainable Engineering Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Giard, Vincent & Jeunet, Jully, 2010. "Optimal sequencing of mixed models with sequence-dependent setups and utility workers on an assembly line," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 290-300, February.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2861 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Guillermo Garcia-Garcia & Yadvinder Singh & Sandeep Jagtap, 2022. "Optimising Changeover through Lean-Manufacturing Principles: A Case Study in a Food Factory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Aslihan Yildiz & Ertugrul Ayyildiz & Alev Taskin Gumus & Coskun Ozkan, 2020. "A Modified Balanced Scorecard Based Hybrid Pythagorean Fuzzy AHP-Topsis Methodology for ATM Site Selection Problem," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(02), pages 365-384, March.
    6. Kübra Yazıcı & Seda Hatice Gökler & Semra Boran, 2021. "An integrated SMED-fuzzy FMEA model for reducing setup time," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 1547-1561, August.
    7. Otto, Alena & Scholl, Armin, 2011. "Incorporating ergonomic risks into assembly line balancing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(2), pages 277-286, July.
    8. Chen, James K.C. & Zorigt, Dulamjav, 2013. "Managing occupational health and safety in the mining industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(11), pages 2321-2331.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaoyan Li & Xuedong Liang & Zhi Li, 2023. "The Strategy of Strengthening Efficiency and Environmental Performance of Product Changeover in the Multiproduct Production System," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    2. Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2013. "A taxonomy of line balancing problems and their solutionapproaches," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 259-277.
    3. Cildoz, Marta & Ibarra, Amaia & Mallor, Fermin, 2020. "Coping with stress in emergency department physicians through improved patient-flow management," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    4. Singh, Usha & Ghadiri, Argang & Weimar, Daniel & Prinz, Joachim, 2020. "“Let’s have a break”: An experimental comparison of work-break interventions and their impact on performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 128-135.
    5. Aroub Alnasser & Nsreen Musallat, 2022. "Food Sustainability Knowledge among Saudis: Towards the Goals of Saudi Vision 2030," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Weckenborg, Christian & Schumacher, Patrick & Thies, Christian & Spengler, Thomas S., 2024. "Flexibility in manufacturing system design: A review of recent approaches from Operations Research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 413-441.
    7. Bautista, Joaquín & Batalla-García, Cristina & Alfaro-Pozo, Rocío, 2016. "Models for assembly line balancing by temporal, spatial and ergonomic risk attributes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 814-829.
    8. Diefenbach, Heiko & Emde, Simon & Glock, Christoph H., 2020. "Loading tow trains ergonomically for just-in-time part supply," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 325-344.
    9. Justyna Woźniak & Katarzyna Pactwa & Mateusz Szczęśniewicz & Dominika Ciapka, 2022. "Declaration of the Sustainable Development Goals of Mining Companies and the Effect of Their Activities in Selected Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Taho Yang & Shin-Yi Lin & Yu-Hsiu Hung & Chung-Chien Hong, 2022. "A Study on the Optimization of In-Process Inspection Procedure for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Manufacturing Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Bogataj, David & Battini, Daria & Calzavara, Martina & Persona, Alessandro, 2019. "The ageing workforce challenge: Investments in collaborative robots or contribution to pension schemes, from the multi-echelon perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 97-106.
    12. Panagiotis K. Marhavilas & Michael G. Tegas & Georgios K. Koulinas & Dimitrios E. Koulouriotis, 2020. "A Joint Stochastic/Deterministic Process with Multi-Objective Decision Making Risk-Assessment Framework for Sustainable Constructions Engineering Projects—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    13. Hui-Ping Tserng & I-Cheng Cho & Chun-Hung Chen & Yu-Fan Liu, 2021. "Developing a Risk Management Process for Infrastructure Projects Using IDEF0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    14. Boysen, Nils & Emde, Simon & Hoeck, Michael & Kauderer, Markus, 2015. "Part logistics in the automotive industry: Decision problems, literature review and research agenda," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 107-120.
    15. Panagiotis K. Marhavilas & Michail Filippidis & Georgios K. Koulinas & Dimitrios E. Koulouriotis, 2020. "A HAZOP with MCDM Based Risk-Assessment Approach: Focusing on the Deviations with Economic/Health/Environmental Impacts in a Process Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-29, January.
    16. Gerassis, S. & Albuquerque, M.T.D. & García, J.F. & Boente, C. & Giráldez, E. & Taboada, J. & Martín, J.E., 2019. "Understanding complex blasting operations: A structural equation model combining Bayesian networks and latent class clustering," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 195-204.
    17. Florian Jaehn & Sergey Kovalev & Mikhail Y. Kovalyov & Erwin Pesch, 2014. "Multiproduct batching and scheduling with buffered rework: The case of a car paint shop," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(6), pages 458-471, September.
    18. Hashemi-Petroodi, S. Ehsan & Thevenin, Simon & Kovalev, Sergey & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2023. "Markov decision process for multi-manned mixed-model assembly lines with walking workers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    19. Sebnem Demirkol Akyol & Adil Baykasoğlu, 2019. "ErgoALWABP: a multiple-rule based constructive randomized search algorithm for solving assembly line worker assignment and balancing problem under ergonomic risk factors," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 291-302, January.
    20. Fröhlich von Elmbach, Alexander & Scholl, Armin & Walter, Rico, 2019. "Minimizing the maximal ergonomic burden in intra-hospital patient transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 840-854.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13804-:d:952051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.