IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i20p13645-d949427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumption Upgrading and Industrial Structural Change: A General Equilibrium Analysis and Empirical Test with Low-Carbon Green Transition Constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaowei Xing

    (School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110167, China)

  • Azhong Ye

    (School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China)

Abstract

To clarify the relations between low-carbon green transition, consumption upgrading, and industrial structure change, this paper firstly builds a dynamic model of the three, then uses the PVAR Model and panel data of 30 Chinese provinces from 2008 to 2020 to carry out empirical study from the rationalization and upgrading dimensions of industrial structural change, respectively. The results are as follows: (1) Low-carbon green transition and consumption upgrading are Granger causes of each other. In this causal relationship, low-carbon green transition hinders consumption upgrading, but consumption upgrading significantly promotes low-carbon green transition. (2) Low-carbon green transition plays a facilitating and hindering role in industrial structure rationalization and upgrading, respectively. However, from the different dimensions of industrial structure change, only industrial structure upgrading has a significant reverse hindering effect on low-carbon green transition, and the reverse effect of industrial structure rationalization on low-carbon green transition is not significant. (3) Consumption upgrading has a hindering and promoting effect on the rationalization of industrial structure in the short- and long-run respectively, and a promoting and hindering effect on the industrial structure upgrading respectively; however, only industrial structure upgrading significantly promotes consumption upgrading in the opposite direction, while industrial structure rationalization has no significant effect on consumption upgrading. These findings propose some suggestions such as advocating the new way of green consumption, constructing and improving the green whole industry chain, and strengthening the synergy between imitative innovation and independent innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaowei Xing & Azhong Ye, 2022. "Consumption Upgrading and Industrial Structural Change: A General Equilibrium Analysis and Empirical Test with Low-Carbon Green Transition Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13645-:d:949427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13645/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13645/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. L. Rachel Ngai & Christopher A. Pissarides, 2007. "Structural Change in a Multisector Model of Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(1), pages 429-443, March.
    2. Shan-Li Wang & Feng-Wen Chen & Bing Liao & Cuiju Zhang, 2020. "Foreign Trade, FDI and the Upgrading of Regional Industrial Structure in China: Based on Spatial Econometric Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Du, Kerui & Cheng, Yuanyuan & Yao, Xin, 2021. "Environmental regulation, green technology innovation, and industrial structure upgrading: The road to the green transformation of Chinese cities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. Holtz-Eakin, Douglas & Newey, Whitney & Rosen, Harvey S, 1988. "Estimating Vector Autoregressions with Panel Data," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 56(6), pages 1371-1395, November.
    5. Liang Chen & Wanli Li & Kaibin Yuan & Xiaoqian Zhang, 2022. "Can informal environmental regulation promote industrial structure upgrading? Evidence from China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(19), pages 2161-2180, April.
    6. Love, Inessa & Zicchino, Lea, 2006. "Financial development and dynamic investment behavior: Evidence from panel VAR," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 190-210, May.
    7. Francisco Alvarez-Cuadrado & Markus Poschke, 2011. "Structural Change Out of Agriculture: Labor Push versus Labor Pull," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 3(3), pages 127-158, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dongjing Chen & Xiaotong Guo, 2023. "Impact of the Digital Economy and Financial Development on Residents’ Consumption Upgrading: Evidence from Mainland China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Fengge Yao & Ying Song & Xiaomei Wang, 2023. "How the Digital Economy Empowers the Structural Upgrading of Cultural Industries—An Analysis Based on the Spatial Durbin Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Melina Dritsaki & Chaido Dritsaki, 2023. "R&D Expenditures on Innovation: A Panel Cointegration Study of the E.U. Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-35, April.
    4. Xiaowei Xing & Qingfeng Zhang & Azhong Ye & Guanghui Zeng, 2023. "Mechanism and Empirical Test of the Impact of Consumption Upgrading on Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Storesletten, Kjetil & Zhao, Bo & Zilibotti, Fabrizio, 2020. "Business Cycle during Structural Change: Arthur Lewis’ Theory from a Neoclassical Perspective," CEPR Discussion Papers 14964, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Herrendorf, Berthold & Rogerson, Richard & Valentinyi, Ákos, 2014. "Growth and Structural Transformation," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 6, pages 855-941, Elsevier.
    3. Dalila Nicet-Chenaf & Eric Rougier, 2009. "Human capital and structural change: how do they interact with each others in growth," Post-Print hal-00798441, HAL.
    4. Ouyang, Yaofu & Li, Peng, 2018. "On the nexus of financial development, economic growth, and energy consumption in China: New perspective from a GMM panel VAR approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 238-252.
    5. Lips, Johannes, 2018. "Debt and the Oil Industry - Analysis on the Firm and Production Level," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181504, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    6. Wang, Yuanyuan & Chi, Yuanying & Xu, Jin-Hua & Yuan, Yongke, 2022. "Consumers’ attitudes and their effects on electric vehicle sales and charging infrastructure construction: An empirical study in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    7. Aimable Nsabimana & Patricia Funjika, 2019. "Mobile phone use, productivity and labour market in Tanzania," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2019-71, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    8. Elgin, Ceyhun & Kuzubas, Tolga Umut, 2013. "Wage-productivity gap in OECD economies," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 7, pages 1-21.
    9. Maurizio Lisciandra & Carlo Migliardo, 2017. "An Empirical Study of the Impact of Corruption on Environmental Performance: Evidence from Panel Data," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(2), pages 297-318, October.
    10. Qureshi, Fiza & Khan, Habib Hussain & Rehman, Ijaz Ur & Ghafoor, Abdul & Qureshi, Saba, 2019. "Mutual fund flows and investors’ expectations in BRICS economies: Implications for international diversification," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 130-150.
    11. O'Toole, Conor M. & Morgenroth, Edgar L.W. & Ha, Thuy T., 2016. "Investment efficiency, state-owned enterprises and privatisation: Evidence from Viet Nam in Transition," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 93-108.
    12. Alvarez-Cuadrado, Francisco & Long, Ngo & Poschke, Markus, 2017. "Capital-labor substitution, structural change and growth," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(3), September.
    13. Mozhgan Asna-ashary & Mohammad Reza Farzanegan & Mehdi Feizi & Saeed Malek Sadati, 2020. "COVID-19 Outbreak and Air Pollution in Iran: A Panel VAR Analysis," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202016, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    14. Luca Agnello & Ricardo M. Sousa, 2013. "Fiscal Policy And Asset Prices," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(2), pages 154-177, April.
    15. Elgin, Ceyhun & Yucel, Emekcan, 2014. "Determinants of the weight for leisure in preferences," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 8, pages 1-26.
    16. Manthos D. Delis & Iftekhar Hasan & Pantelis Kazakis, 2014. "Bank Regulations and Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 18(5), pages 1811-1846.
    17. repec:diw:diwwpp:dp1365 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Odolinski, Kristofer & Wheat, Phillip, 2016. "Dynamics in rail infrastructure provision: maintenance and renewal costs in Sweden," Working papers in Transport Economics 2016:23, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI), revised 11 Dec 2017.
    19. Gangopadhyay, Kausik & Mondal, Debasis, 2021. "Productivity, relative sectoral prices, and total factor productivity: Theory and evidence," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    20. Luca Agnello & Ricardo M. Sousa, 2011. "Can Fiscal Policy Stimulus Boost Economic Recovery?," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 62(6), pages 1045-1066.
    21. Sumon Kumar Bhaumik & Manisha Chakrabarty & Ali M. Kutan & Ekta Selarka, 2021. "How Effective are Stock Market Reforms in Emerging Market Economies? Evidence from a Panel VAR Model of the Indian Stock Market," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 19(4), pages 795-818, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13645-:d:949427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.