IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i20p13488-d946978.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterizing the Long-Term Landscape Dynamics of a Typical Cloudy Mountainous Area in Northwest Yunnan, China

Author

Listed:
  • Youjun Chen

    (College of Agronomy and Biosciences, Research Center for Agroecology in Erhai Lake Watershed, and Research Center for Northwest Yunnan Biodiversity, Dali University, Dali 671003, China)

  • Xiaokang Hu

    (College of Agronomy and Biosciences, Research Center for Agroecology in Erhai Lake Watershed, and Research Center for Northwest Yunnan Biodiversity, Dali University, Dali 671003, China)

  • Yanjie Zhang

    (College of Agronomy and Biosciences, Research Center for Agroecology in Erhai Lake Watershed, and Research Center for Northwest Yunnan Biodiversity, Dali University, Dali 671003, China)

  • Jianmeng Feng

    (College of Agronomy and Biosciences, Research Center for Agroecology in Erhai Lake Watershed, and Research Center for Northwest Yunnan Biodiversity, Dali University, Dali 671003, China)

Abstract

Detailed knowledge of landscape dynamics is crucial for many applications, from resource management to ecosystem service assessments. However, identifying the spatial distribution of the landscape using optical remote sensing techniques is difficult in mountainous areas, primarily due to cloud cover and topographic relief. Our study uses stable classification samples from mountainous areas to investigate an integrated approach that addresses large volumes of cloud-cover data (with associated data gaps) and extracts landscape time series (LTS) with a high time–frequency resolution. We applied this approach to map LTS in a typical cloudy mountainous area (Erhai watershed in northwestern Yunnan, China) using dense Landsat stacks, and then we also used the classified results to investigate the spatial–temporal landscape changes in the study area at biennial intervals. The overall accuracy of the landscape classification ranged from 81.75% to 88.18%. The results showed highly dynamic processes in the landscape throughout the study period. Forest was the main land cover type, covering approximately 39.19% to 41.68% of the total study area. Alpine meadow showed fluctuating trends, with a net loss of 11.22% and an annual reduction rate of −0.4%. Shrub cover increased by 1.26%, and water bodies showed a small decrease in area, resulting in an overall net change of −0.03%. Built-up land and farmland areas continued to expand, and their annual growth rates were 1.52% and 1.06%, respectively. Bare land showed the highest loss, with a net change of 228.97 km 2 . In the Erhai watershed, all the landscape classes changed or transitioned into other classes, and a substantial decrease in bare land occurred. The biennial LTS maps allow us to fully understand the spatially and temporally complex change processes occurring in landscape classes; these changes would not be observable at coarse temporal intervals (e.g., 5–10 years). Our study highlights the importance of increasing the temporal resolution in landscape change studies to support sustainable land resource management strategies and integrate landscape planning for environmental conservation.

Suggested Citation

  • Youjun Chen & Xiaokang Hu & Yanjie Zhang & Jianmeng Feng, 2022. "Characterizing the Long-Term Landscape Dynamics of a Typical Cloudy Mountainous Area in Northwest Yunnan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13488-:d:946978
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13488/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13488/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walz, Ulrich, 2015. "Indicators to monitor the structural diversity of landscapes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 295(C), pages 88-106.
    2. Seema Mehra Parihar & Vijendra Kumar Pandey & Anshu & Karuna Shree & Khusro Moin & Mohammed Baber Ali & Kanchana Narasimhan & Jeetesh Rai & Azka Kamil, 2022. "Land Use Dynamics and Impact on Regional Climate Post-Tehri Dam in the Bhilangana Basin, Garhwal Himalaya," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-16, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ying Liang & Wei Song, 2022. "Ecological and Environmental Effects of Land Use and Cover Changes on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau: A Bibliometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Simensen, Trond & Halvorsen, Rune & Erikstad, Lars, 2018. "Methods for landscape characterisation and mapping: A systematic review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 557-569.
    3. Monteleone, Massimo & Cammerino, Anna Rita Bernadette & Libutti, Angela, 2018. "Agricultural “greening” and cropland diversification trends: Potential contribution of agroenergy crops in Capitanata (South Italy)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 591-600.
    4. Chopin, Pierre & Blazy, Jean-Marc & Guindé, Loïc & Wery, Jacques & Doré, Thierry, 2017. "A framework for designing multi-functional agricultural landscapes: Application to Guadeloupe Island," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 316-329.
    5. Piotr Krajewski, 2019. "Monitoring of Landscape Transformations within Landscape Parks in Poland in the 21st Century," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, April.
    6. Joanna Badach & Elżbieta Raszeja, 2019. "Developing a Framework for the Implementation of Landscape and Greenspace Indicators in Sustainable Urban Planning. Waterfront Landscape Management: Case Studies in Gdańsk, Poznań and Bristol," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-26, April.
    7. Michael Roth & Silvio Hildebrandt & Ulrich Walz & Wolfgang Wende, 2021. "Large-Area Empirically Based Visual Landscape Quality Assessment for Spatial Planning—A Validation Approach by Method Triangulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    8. Shuhan Liu & Dongyan Wang & Guoping Lei & Hong Li & Wenbo Li, 2019. "Elevated Risk of Ecological Land and Underlying Factors Associated with Rapid Urbanization and Overprotected Agriculture in Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Schönhart, Martin & Schauppenlehner, Thomas & Kuttner, Michael & Kirchner, Mathias & Schmid, Erwin, 2016. "Climate change impacts on farm production, landscape appearance, and the environment: Policy scenario results from an integrated field-farm-landscape model in Austria," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 39-50.
    10. Adegbite Adeleke Adesipo & Dirk Freese & Stefan Zerbe & Gerhard Wiegleb, 2021. "An Approach to Thresholds for Evaluating Post-Mining Site Reclamation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, May.
    11. Gissi, Elena & Gaglio, Mattias & Reho, Matelda, 2016. "Sustainable energy potential from biomass through ecosystem services trade-off analysis: The case of the Province of Rovigo (Northern Italy)," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 1-19.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13488-:d:946978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.